tag makes my
links get progressively smaller. (I'm assigning my foo2 class as .7em). This
is demonstrated at...
http://serversolutions.com/averra/lifeway_deliver/c_staff.asp
The only way around this seems to be to take the tag out altogether.
This works ok, but curious as to WHY it did not work with the
tag.
Can anyone point my browser in the right direction to get an indepth
knowledge of how 'ems' interact with other elements on the page? I know they
are a 'relative' size and inherit the size of it's parent (presumably my
tag), but is there some way to stop this inheritance? Also, some example
code of ems used in actual practice would be helpful to peruse.
tia for your insights! and have a Happy Thanksgiving all...
Janice
From john.pye at purplehouse.com Wed Nov 22 07:50:03 2000
From: john.pye at purplehouse.com (John Pye)
Date: Wed Nov 22 07:50:03 2000
Subject: [thelist] Remote DB synchronisation
Message-ID:
Has anyone got a story to tell about keeping a remote (live website) Oracle
database syncronized with a local (admin website) database? Is it easy to
get record-by-record syncronization between two databases, or the relatively
curly probelm that it appears to me to be?
There would be multiple tables, some mostly being updated via the intranet
website, others being mostly updated via the live webstie. But if possible,
we'd want to allow all tables to work with two-way synchronization. The
occasional bit of manual intervention wouldn't be out of the question.
We're running Cold Fusion 4.5 and Oracle 8i on Solaris on our site.
JP
www.creativebase.com ...any comments for me?
From lisa at koolfish.com Wed Nov 22 07:59:02 2000
From: lisa at koolfish.com (Lisa Bartholomew)
Date: Wed Nov 22 07:59:02 2000
Subject: [thelist] table cell troubles in Netscape
Message-ID:
Hi all, hope you are all faring better on the sleep front than I am lately.
Yet another niggly problem I can't get my head round.
I have a table that is split so that the outsides of the table form a
rectangle with a drop shadow and in the middle is live text with a bg
colour. When I view it in Netscape, for some reason I can't fathom out the
right hand column is adding more space so that there is a gap and the text
is not centred. I don't really want to make it a graphic as the first page
is rather graphic intensive and I have 2 more of these quotes to add.
Hard to explain so the page is here:
http://www.koolfish.com/jake/index.html
If you want to see what it should look like view in Explorer. I have the
table cells set to the correct width so why is Netscape creating the cell
larger than it should be?
The rest of the site is all over the place so please ignore :)
Thanks
Lisa.
From janice at discoverysystems.com Wed Nov 22 08:24:37 2000
From: janice at discoverysystems.com (JTocher)
Date: Wed Nov 22 08:24:37 2000
Subject: [thelist] table cell troubles in Netscape
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
Hi Lisa,
I've also seen some weirdness in Netscape where it has a 'mind of it's own'
when creating tables - doesn't always seem to pay attention to the 'pixel
width' they're given!
Have you considered adding a 'spacer gif' in the interior to blow it out to
the size you want?
Just a thought...
Janice
btw - nice looking site!
on 11/22/00 9:05 AM, you wrote:
> Hi all, hope you are all faring better on the sleep front than I am lately.
> Yet another niggly problem I can't get my head round.
>
> I have a table that is split so that the outsides of the table form a
> rectangle with a drop shadow and in the middle is live text with a bg
> colour. When I view it in Netscape, for some reason I can't fathom out the
> right hand column is adding more space so that there is a gap and the text
> is not centred. I don't really want to make it a graphic as the first page
> is rather graphic intensive and I have 2 more of these quotes to add.
>
> Hard to explain so the page is here:
>
> http://www.koolfish.com/jake/index.html
>
> If you want to see what it should look like view in Explorer. I have the
> table cells set to the correct width so why is Netscape creating the cell
> larger than it should be?
>
> The rest of the site is all over the place so please ignore :)
> Thanks
> Lisa.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------
> For unsubscribe and other options, including
> the Tip Harvester and archive of TheList go to:
> http://lists.evolt.org Workers of the Web, evolt !
>
From john.pye at purplehouse.com Wed Nov 22 08:26:53 2000
From: john.pye at purplehouse.com (John Pye)
Date: Wed Nov 22 08:26:53 2000
Subject: [thelist] Confused by 'ems'...
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
> something is just not getting through my head
> on using the 'em' attributed for type size!
I have avoided using ems for the reason in
http://www.richinstyle.com/bugs/netscape4.html
This document suggests that you use px as the only reasonably universal type
measure. On my site however, I still found I was having problems with my
desired specification of line spacing of fonts with Netscape v4, so I used a
different style sheet just for Netscape viewers:
NETSCAPE VERSION:
body,P,li,div{ font: normal 8pt "Arial", Geneva, sans-serif;color: #666666}
THE REST VERSION:
body,P,li,div{ font: normal 10px/12px arial, Geneva, sans-serif;color:
#666666}
In Cold Fusion, I did the Netscape test by checking the HTTP_USER_AGENT
string for the presence of both 'Mozilla/4.0' AND 'Nav' substrings.
I don't know if it's bulletproof before version 4 browsers, which may be a
concern.
JP
From mfischer at e-fishsolutions.com Wed Nov 22 08:28:30 2000
From: mfischer at e-fishsolutions.com (Matthew Fischer)
Date: Wed Nov 22 08:28:30 2000
Subject: [thelist] table cell troubles in Netscape
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID: <20001122092845-r01010600-2be5b301@209.61.127.211>
I added the NOWRAP attribute to the cell with your quote in it and that displays the same for me in NN 4.7 and IE 5.5 on a Mac...
On 11/22/00 at 9:05 PM, lisa at koolfish.com (Lisa Bartholomew) wrote:
> Hi all, hope you are all faring better on the sleep front than I am lately.
> Yet another niggly problem I can't get my head round.
>
> I have a table that is split so that the outsides of the table form a
> rectangle with a drop shadow and in the middle is live text with a bg
> colour. When I view it in Netscape, for some reason I can't fathom out the
> right hand column is adding more space so that there is a gap and the text
> is not centred. I don't really want to make it a graphic as the first page
> is rather graphic intensive and I have 2 more of these quotes to add.
>
> Hard to explain so the page is here:
>
> http://www.koolfish.com/jake/index.html
>
> If you want to see what it should look like view in Explorer. I have the
> table cells set to the correct width so why is Netscape creating the cell
> larger than it should be?
>
> The rest of the site is all over the place so please ignore :)
> Thanks
> Lisa.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------
> For unsubscribe and other options, including
> the Tip Harvester and archive of TheList go to:
> http://lists.evolt.org Workers of the Web, evolt !
From janice at discoverysystems.com Wed Nov 22 08:38:41 2000
From: janice at discoverysystems.com (JTocher)
Date: Wed Nov 22 08:38:41 2000
Subject: [thelist] table cell troubles in Netscape
In-Reply-To: <20001122092845-r01010600-2be5b301@209.61.127.211>
Message-ID:
Amazing Matthew! that works better than my spacer suggestion... the ever
on-going question is why would the 'nowrap' affect how the cell is
centered??? ah, but is there ever an explanation to fickle browsers?
Janice
on 11/22/00 9:28 AM, you wrote:
> I added the NOWRAP attribute to the cell with your quote in it and that
> displays the same for me in NN 4.7 and IE 5.5 on a Mac...
>
> On 11/22/00 at 9:05 PM, lisa at koolfish.com (Lisa Bartholomew) wrote:
>
>> Hi all, hope you are all faring better on the sleep front than I am lately.
>> Yet another niggly problem I can't get my head round.
>>
>> I have a table that is split so that the outsides of the table form a
>> rectangle with a drop shadow and in the middle is live text with a bg
>> colour. When I view it in Netscape, for some reason I can't fathom out the
>> right hand column is adding more space so that there is a gap and the text
>> is not centred. I don't really want to make it a graphic as the first page
>> is rather graphic intensive and I have 2 more of these quotes to add.
>>
>> Hard to explain so the page is here:
>>
>> http://www.koolfish.com/jake/index.html
>>
>> If you want to see what it should look like view in Explorer. I have the
>> table cells set to the correct width so why is Netscape creating the cell
>> larger than it should be?
>>
>> The rest of the site is all over the place so please ignore :)
>> Thanks
>> Lisa.
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------
>> For unsubscribe and other options, including
>> the Tip Harvester and archive of TheList go to:
>> http://lists.evolt.org Workers of the Web, evolt !
>
> ---------------------------------------
> For unsubscribe and other options, including
> the Tip Harvester and archive of TheList go to:
> http://lists.evolt.org Workers of the Web, evolt !
>
From janice at discoverysystems.com Wed Nov 22 09:11:57 2000
From: janice at discoverysystems.com (JTocher)
Date: Wed Nov 22 09:11:57 2000
Subject: [thelist] Confused by 'ems'...
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
Hey John,
Thanks for the tip. This brings up a question... per my client's request,
they want to 'link' a stylesheet to the main page for their content editors.
Will this linked stylesheet not take precedence over any stylesheet served
up based on javascript detection of the browser?
also, they wanted to NOT use the pt or px sizes so that the text will be
scaled according to the size selected by the user.
Janice
btw - thanks for passing on the read from richinstyle - looks to be a good
resource!
on 11/22/00 9:26 AM, you wrote:
>> something is just not getting through my head
>> on using the 'em' attributed for type size!
>
> I have avoided using ems for the reason in
> http://www.richinstyle.com/bugs/netscape4.html
>
> This document suggests that you use px as the only reasonably universal type
> measure. On my site however, I still found I was having problems with my
> desired specification of line spacing of fonts with Netscape v4, so I used a
> different style sheet just for Netscape viewers:
>
> NETSCAPE VERSION:
> body,P,li,div{ font: normal 8pt "Arial", Geneva, sans-serif;color: #666666}
>
> THE REST VERSION:
> body,P,li,div{ font: normal 10px/12px arial, Geneva, sans-serif;color:
> #666666}
>
> In Cold Fusion, I did the Netscape test by checking the HTTP_USER_AGENT
> string for the presence of both 'Mozilla/4.0' AND 'Nav' substrings.
>
> I don't know if it's bulletproof before version 4 browsers, which may be a
> concern.
>
> JP
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------
> For unsubscribe and other options, including
> the Tip Harvester and archive of TheList go to:
> http://lists.evolt.org Workers of the Web, evolt !
>
From martin.p.burns at uk.pwcglobal.com Wed Nov 22 09:14:30 2000
From: martin.p.burns at uk.pwcglobal.com (martin.p.burns at uk.pwcglobal.com)
Date: Wed Nov 22 09:14:30 2000
Subject: [thelist] Remote DB synchronisation
Message-ID: <8025699F.005387FE.00@intleursmtp10.uk.pw.com>
Memo from Martin P Burns of PricewaterhouseCoopers
-------------------- Start of message text --------------------
John
There are a number of products which will handle this (and more -
replicating records to different servers by ruleset).
If you've the cash, have a look at
http://www.interwoven.com/products/opendeploy
http://www.vignette.com/CDA/Site/0,2097,1-1-731-1191-741-1220,ff.html
Caveat: They're not cheap.
Cheers
Martin
Please respond to thelist at lists.evolt.org
To: thelist at lists.evolt.org
cc:
Subject: [thelist] Remote DB synchronisation
Has anyone got a story to tell about keeping a remote (live website) Oracle
database syncronized with a local (admin website) database? Is it easy to
get record-by-record syncronization between two databases, or the relatively
curly probelm that it appears to me to be?
There would be multiple tables, some mostly being updated via the intranet
website, others being mostly updated via the live webstie. But if possible,
we'd want to allow all tables to work with two-way synchronization. The
occasional bit of manual intervention wouldn't be out of the question.
We're running Cold Fusion 4.5 and Oracle 8i on Solaris on our site.
--------------------- End of message text --------------------
The principal place of business of PricewaterhouseCoopers and its associate
partnerships is 1 Embankment Place, London WC2N 6NN where lists of the
partners' names are available for inspection. All partners in the associate
partnerships are authorised to conduct business as agents of, and all
contracts for services to clients are with, PricewaterhouseCoopers. The UK
firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers is authorised by the Institute of Chartered
Accountants in England and Wales to carry on investment business.
PricewaterhouseCoopers is a member of the world-wide
PricewaterhouseCoopers organisation.
----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which
it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any
review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action
in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
From Mike.Hodgson at citywatch.co.uk Wed Nov 22 09:25:00 2000
From: Mike.Hodgson at citywatch.co.uk (Mike.Hodgson)
Date: Wed Nov 22 09:25:00 2000
Subject: [thelist] Jump to entry in select box?
Message-ID: <000e01c05479$aaacc800$671e1782@Citywatch.co.uk>
Hi guys,
I'm trying to fumble my way round a bit of javascript and am wondering it's
possible to jump (using onClick in a checkbox) to a specific entry in a
pulldown list based on the *value* of the entry. I know I can jump to a
specific entry in the options *array* using something like:
which will jump to "Sean". Is there a way I can jump to "Chris" by
referring to the number "9"???
I hope that made sense.
Cheers,
Mick
PS: a cc to my email address would be great as I'm on the digest.
?
----------------------------------------------------------------
Visit our Internet site at http://www.citywatch.co.uk
?
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Citywatch Ltd.
From john.pye at purplehouse.com Wed Nov 22 09:38:35 2000
From: john.pye at purplehouse.com (John Pye)
Date: Wed Nov 22 09:38:35 2000
Subject: [thelist] Confused by 'ems'...
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
Hi Janice
> ..wanted to NOT use the pt or px sizes
> so that the text will be scaled according
> to the size selected by the user..
Perhaps you want to use % units. That RichInStyle doc seems to say that they
are OK, if used carefully. See section D in that document I quoted, here:
http://www.richinstyle.com/bugs/netscape4.html#units
But don't set relative sizes on BODY or DIV tags, see:
http://www.richinstyle.com/bugs/netscape4.html#font
It's painful stuff alright.
JP
From rcamden at allaire.com Wed Nov 22 09:44:00 2000
From: rcamden at allaire.com (Raymond K. Camden)
Date: Wed Nov 22 09:44:00 2000
Subject: [thelist] Jump to entry in select box?
In-Reply-To: <000e01c05479$aaacc800$671e1782@Citywatch.co.uk>
Message-ID:
This code will handle that.
I believe that addressing the form by name, document.Foo, is a 4.x only
convention. If this is the only form on the page, you can replace it with
document.forms[0], or, if it's the Xth form, use X-1 instead of 0.
=======================================================================
Raymond Camden, Principal Spectra Compliance Engineer for Allaire
Email : jedimaster at allaire.com
ICQ UIN : 3679482
"My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda
> -----Original Message-----
> From: thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org
> [mailto:thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org]On Behalf Of Mike.Hodgson
> Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2000 6:45 AM
> To: thelist at lists.evolt.org
> Subject: [thelist] Jump to entry in select box?
>
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm trying to fumble my way round a bit of javascript and am
> wondering it's
> possible to jump (using onClick in a checkbox) to a specific entry in a
> pulldown list based on the *value* of the entry. I know I can jump to a
> specific entry in the options *array* using something like:
>
>
>
> which will jump to "Sean". Is there a way I can jump to "Chris" by
> referring to the number "9"???
>
> I hope that made sense.
> Cheers,
> Mick
> PS: a cc to my email address would be great as I'm on the digest.
>
> ?
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Visit our Internet site at http://www.citywatch.co.uk
> ?
> Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
> sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be
> the views of Citywatch Ltd.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------
> For unsubscribe and other options, including
> the Tip Harvester and archive of TheList go to:
> http://lists.evolt.org Workers of the Web, evolt !
From roselli at earthlink.net Wed Nov 22 09:47:50 2000
From: roselli at earthlink.net (aardvark)
Date: Wed Nov 22 09:47:50 2000
Subject: [thelist] Confused by 'ems'...
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID: <200011221547.eAMFlnh04388@farmer.oracular.com>
> From: JTocher
>
> Thanks for the tip. This brings up a question... per my client's request,
> they want to 'link' a stylesheet to the main page for their content editors.
> Will this linked stylesheet not take precedence over any stylesheet served
> up based on javascript detection of the browser?
a linked stylesheet will be overridden by any styles set in the head
of the document, and those will be overridden by any inline styles...
however, you can have more than one linked style sheet, or
however you want to do it, as long as you know that classes of the
same name (as well as ids and tags) get overridden in that
manner...
> also, they wanted to NOT use the pt or px sizes so that the text will be
> scaled according to the size selected by the user.
did you try %? at the very least, you should try % for line height,
since using other units caused printing wonkiness in NN4.x (like 50
pages worth of paper with one line of text each)...
i know there was a good thread about the problem with ems a
couple months ago... anyone got those messages?
From sck at biljettpoolen.se Wed Nov 22 09:48:14 2000
From: sck at biljettpoolen.se (Steve Cook)
Date: Wed Nov 22 09:48:14 2000
Subject: [thelist] What constitutes delivery?
Message-ID: <3B55A5A1F233D41183A800D0B74D4D5205E644@SBS>
Hi folks,
does anyone have any good information regarding the definition of when a web
project is delivered? Our supplier needs to tighten up their definition and
I thought it would be good to ask list members how they define delivery in
their contracts.
.steve
From roselli at earthlink.net Wed Nov 22 09:57:30 2000
From: roselli at earthlink.net (aardvark)
Date: Wed Nov 22 09:57:30 2000
Subject: [thelist] What constitutes delivery?
In-Reply-To: <3B55A5A1F233D41183A800D0B74D4D5205E644@SBS>
Message-ID: <200011221557.eAMFvUh04593@farmer.oracular.com>
> From: Steve Cook
>
> does anyone have any good information regarding the definition of when a web
> project is delivered? Our supplier needs to tighten up their definition and
> I thought it would be good to ask list members how they define delivery in
> their contracts.
when all items in the scope have been completed (as defined in the
scope), the project is complete...
delivery is when you have completed the scope, done any
necessary installs or transfers (although this is usually part of the
scope), and gotten client verification that data is received or install
is complete...
at that point we have the client sign off on the project and we
officially close it...
From mfischer at e-fishsolutions.com Wed Nov 22 09:59:24 2000
From: mfischer at e-fishsolutions.com (Matthew Fischer)
Date: Wed Nov 22 09:59:24 2000
Subject: [thelist] Jump to entry in select box?
In-Reply-To: <000e01c05479$aaacc800$671e1782@Citywatch.co.uk>
Message-ID: <20001122105939-r01010600-ab676567@209.61.127.211>
I'm not sure I understood exactly what you were asking, but the following will change the selectedIndex of your pulldown menu to the first option where the text (not the value) is the same as the value of the checkbox. The way this is written it will only change the value of the pulldown when the box is checked, not when it is unchecked. If you want it to change on checking or unchecking, remove the line that says:
if (checkbox.checked==true) {
and the last right curly bracket.
I would think something like this would be better done with radio buttons then checkboxes, but here ya go anyways:
On 11/22/00 at 11:45 AM, Mike.Hodgson at citywatch.co.uk (Mike.Hodgson) wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm trying to fumble my way round a bit of javascript and am wondering it's
> possible to jump (using onClick in a checkbox) to a specific entry in a
> pulldown list based on the *value* of the entry. I know I can jump to a
> specific entry in the options *array* using something like:
>
>
>
> which will jump to "Sean". Is there a way I can jump to "Chris" by
> referring to the number "9"???
>
> I hope that made sense.
> Cheers,
> Mick
> PS: a cc to my email address would be great as I'm on the digest.
From ross at designcc.com Wed Nov 22 10:01:11 2000
From: ross at designcc.com (J. Ross Dishner)
Date: Wed Nov 22 10:01:11 2000
Subject: [thelist] What constitutes delivery?
In-Reply-To: <3B55A5A1F233D41183A800D0B74D4D5205E644@SBS>
References: <3B55A5A1F233D41183A800D0B74D4D5205E644@SBS>
Message-ID:
We typically define delivery as the point at which the client is
delivered all pieces that were outlined in the original contract.
That excludes any additional requirements identified after the fact.
While we usually roll those items in during the project this
definition has saved us when a client was unwilling to pay without
first being delivered his additional piddlies (sp? def?).
>Hi folks,
>
>does anyone have any good information regarding the definition of when a web
>project is delivered? Our supplier needs to tighten up their definition and
>I thought it would be good to ask list members how they define delivery in
>their contracts.
>
>.steve
>
>
>---------------------------------------
>For unsubscribe and other options, including
>the Tip Harvester and archive of TheList go to:
>http://lists.evolt.org Workers of the Web, evolt !
From richard.morris at web-designers.co.uk Wed Nov 22 10:10:51 2000
From: richard.morris at web-designers.co.uk (Richard H. Morris)
Date: Wed Nov 22 10:10:51 2000
Subject: [thelist] Confused by 'ems'...
In-Reply-To: <200011221547.eAMFlnh04388@farmer.oracular.com>
Message-ID:
aardvark [roselli at earthlink.net] suggested:
> -----Original Message-----
> > also, they wanted to NOT use the pt or px sizes so that the text will be
> > scaled according to the size selected by the user.
>
> did you try %?
Don't forget to check for percentages of percentages (of percentages...)
when specifying % font sizes if they're nested (such as BODY % and TABLE %,
P %, etc.)
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/
Richard. H. Morris, Web Designers Limited
~~ http://www.web-designers.co.uk ~~
"I'd rather have a full bottle in front of me
than a full frontal lobotomy"
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/
From richard.morris at web-designers.co.uk Wed Nov 22 10:10:58 2000
From: richard.morris at web-designers.co.uk (Richard H. Morris)
Date: Wed Nov 22 10:10:58 2000
Subject: [thelist] Dropdowns - good or bad?
In-Reply-To: <8025699F.003382A5.00@uk-emamta003.ema.pwcinternal.com>
Message-ID:
martin.p.burns at uk.pwcglobal.com wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> >It's nothing they haven't seen elsewhere.
> But is it something which they have to *think* about? Do they *really*
> know it (rather than having seen it) - the word I'm reaching here for is
> 'grok'. If users don't grok an interface paradigm, they won't use it
> as effectively, and the communication/commercial aims won't be
> realised to the same extent. That's the name of the game, surely?
Apparently not, according to your employers: the pwcglobal.com web site has
*two* drop-down menus on the home page!!! Pot | Kettle | Black error?
> >And truly horrible the latter looks too!
> But highly usable.
No argument there.
> (although the BBC's high bandwidth version is a good
> compromise).
It's an excellent site for many, many reasons.
> Why do you think that Yahoo gets the traffic it does? It's
> butt-ugly, but highly usable.
In a word: content. I actually find it a complete pain in the bum to get to
anything useful on Yahoo! which is why I don't use it, preferring...
> Google is even more task centred, and is
> punching way above its (lack of incumbancy) weight.
... this one.
> >in these
> >days of ADSL/cable and fast modems are we a dying breed?
> Yes. Until we all have Tb capacity links, we will need to code for speed.
Which is what we do.
> Source of figures?
None whatsoever. Take a look at your company's comms. provision. 14.4k
modems? I doubt it somehow.
> Likely estimation of how many will fail through poor usability?
Not half as many as through a failure to actually plan a revenue/business
model. Sure, many will fail on usability issues but mainly in the B2C
environment.
> Take a look at http://www.work24.co.uk/ - try and register. That will tell
> you why it's failing. They're getting loads and loads of hits to the front
> page, but almost no registrations (ie conversions to customers).
I find those sorts of delays with many back-end driven sites.
> Quite the opposite actually. I see sites maturing into greater
> usability, or
> failing.
I fail to believe (in the B2B context especially) that we'll all be
reverting to basic HTML-only sites like the institutional/research sites
where content is king.
> Immature businesses moving online tend to go for whizzy,
Immature, like Ford, Jaguar, Audi, etc. ?
> I really do see Flash moving towards the area it does best - complicated
> animated interactivity - and away from replacing HTML in the areas which
> HTML does extremely well.
Agreed. I have yet to use Flash for a web site.
> He doesn't claim to be a visual designer. But take a look at his traffic
> figures... Positive ROI? I think so.
In much the same way as the motivational speaker types generate business...
> If the client is providing a public service in the UK (also other
> countries,
> but the UK is the area I know best) then they're legally bound to be
> accessible.
I'm not aware of that legal requirement: could you give
details?
Of our Clients doing both B2B and B2C business, their sites are indeed coded
for accessibility.
> I would also point out that there are 10m people in the UK with registered
> disabilities. A reasonable market if I'm not mistaken.
Indeed, although that again depends upon your Client demographic. I wonder
how many sites written by designers on this list are written to comply with
Bobby's usability/accessibility in mind?
Certainly my company site fails as does PWC's.
How many sites with DHTML navigation menus pass?
> > No: because they work for the sites in question.
> Do they work because
> 1) you think they do?
In the context of Client requirements, yes.
> 2) the client thinks they're nice?
Yes.
> 3) you've done Usability Testing as part of your development programme?
No, because the Client has not requested that service - usually because of
budgetary constraints. We don't run focus groups, usability testing
workshops, etc. unless the Client is willing to pay for them. But then our
Client base does not want to spend many thousands on their sites either...
> 4) You've assessed the ROI of your design work?
Nope. However, our Client base again is simply making the CVA against
traditional advertising rather than as a new medium.
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/
Richard H. Morris, Director, Web Designers Ltd
http://www.web-designers.co.uk
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Registered in England No 3506389
Registered Office:
3 Church Street Wymondham Norfolk NR18 0PH
Trading Address:
4 Maden Close Wymondham Norfolk NR18 0UA
T: +44 (0)1953 606158
F: +44 (0)1953 606185
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/
From martin.p.burns at uk.pwcglobal.com Wed Nov 22 10:50:59 2000
From: martin.p.burns at uk.pwcglobal.com (martin.p.burns at uk.pwcglobal.com)
Date: Wed Nov 22 10:50:59 2000
Subject: [thelist] What constitutes delivery?
Message-ID: <8025699F.005C411A.00@uk-emamta003.ema.pwcinternal.com>
Memo from Martin P Burns of PricewaterhouseCoopers
-------------------- Start of message text --------------------
Hi Steve
Could you expand a bit on what you mean?
I'm struggling to understand context beyond UAT
Cheers
Martin
Please respond to thelist at lists.evolt.org
To: "'thelist at lists.evolt.org'"
cc:
Subject: [thelist] What constitutes delivery?
Hi folks,
does anyone have any good information regarding the definition of when a web
project is delivered? Our supplier needs to tighten up their definition and
I thought it would be good to ask list members how they define delivery in
their contracts.
--------------------- End of message text --------------------
The principal place of business of PricewaterhouseCoopers and its associate
partnerships is 1 Embankment Place, London WC2N 6NN where lists of the
partners' names are available for inspection. All partners in the associate
partnerships are authorised to conduct business as agents of, and all
contracts for services to clients are with, PricewaterhouseCoopers. The UK
firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers is authorised by the Institute of Chartered
Accountants in England and Wales to carry on investment business.
PricewaterhouseCoopers is a member of the world-wide
PricewaterhouseCoopers organisation.
----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which
it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any
review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action
in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
From sgd at ti3.com Wed Nov 22 10:53:24 2000
From: sgd at ti3.com (Scott Dexter)
Date: Wed Nov 22 10:53:24 2000
Subject: [thelist] What does '_vti_' in my access logs mean?
Message-ID: <8C8B8745C0FE7A43BFA6CABAB321117223F7CF@gate.ti3.com>
The post is someone actually updating a file (or attempting to)
anything with _vti is an MS FrontPage Extensions directory/file. The FP
Extensions are server-side CGI's that the FP editor (and InterDev) use to
manage the site. A nice thing about the .NET stuff coming out is you don't
have to use them to update files =)
George, how do you update pages?
sgd
--
work: http://www.ti3.com/
non: http://thinksafely.org/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jacob Stetser [mailto:icongarden at icongarden.com]
> > Found a couple of odd lines in my access.log... anyone know
> what they mean?
> >
> > "OPTIONS ...
> > "GET /_vti_inf.html HTTP/1.1" 404 4506
> > "POST /_vti_bin/shtml.exe/_vti_rpc HTTP/1.1" 404 4506
> > "OPTIONS ...
> >
From roselli at earthlink.net Wed Nov 22 10:58:42 2000
From: roselli at earthlink.net (aardvark)
Date: Wed Nov 22 10:58:42 2000
Subject: [thelist] Dropdowns - good or bad?
In-Reply-To:
References: <8025699F.003382A5.00@uk-emamta003.ema.pwcinternal.com>
Message-ID: <200011221658.eAMGwfh05726@farmer.oracular.com>
> From: "Richard H. Morris"
[...]
> > 'grok'. If users don't grok an interface paradigm, they won't use it
> > as effectively, and the communication/commercial aims won't be
> > realised to the same extent. That's the name of the game, surely?
>
> Apparently not, according to your employers: the pwcglobal.com web site has
> *two* drop-down menus on the home page!!! Pot | Kettle | Black error?
you're assuming he has any control over that company's site... i
would say he doesn't... look at the crap they auotmatically append
to his posts, that's not a company that understands the medium...
martin, OTOH, does understand the medium, and much better than
his (new) employers...
> > Why do you think that Yahoo gets the traffic it does? It's
> > butt-ugly, but highly usable.
>
> In a word: content. I actually find it a complete pain in the bum to get to
> anything useful on Yahoo! which is why I don't use it, preferring...
i only use it, and google, for searching only, so both are great for
me... i've learned to tune out all the portal crap...
> > Likely estimation of how many will fail through poor usability?
>
> Not half as many as through a failure to actually plan a revenue/business
> model. Sure, many will fail on usability issues but mainly in the B2C
> environment.
yes, but i think companies like boo.com are a perfect example of
how shortsightedness on the UI end as well as the business end
are both equally as dangerous... turn away customers and you turn
away *all* sources of revenue...
> > Take a look at http://www.work24.co.uk/ - try and register. That will tell
> > you why it's failing. They're getting loads and loads of hits to the front
> > page, but almost no registrations (ie conversions to customers).
>
> I find those sorts of delays with many back-end driven sites.
i actually have some familiarity with this site... trust me, the
backend is the least broken thing on this site... the site as a whole
is horribly lacking in any usability testing, or even browser testing...
it's actually in the hall of shame over here when i train new folks...
> > Quite the opposite actually. I see sites maturing into greater
> > usability, or failing.
>
> I fail to believe (in the B2B context especially) that we'll all be
> reverting to basic HTML-only sites like the institutional/research sites
> where content is king.
for B2B clients, i've found that content *is* king... anything that
slows the transfer of information (everything from EDI to online
sales tools) has proven to be costly...
> > Immature businesses moving online tend to go for whizzy,
>
> Immature, like Ford, Jaguar, Audi, etc. ?
immature developers... that would be more accurate... those
companies don't understand the medium, and as such are
immature in that medium/market and hire developers who aren't
seasoned...
> > He doesn't claim to be a visual designer. But take a look at his traffic
> > figures... Positive ROI? I think so.
>
> In much the same way as the motivational speaker types generate business...
LOL... that's a good one... seriously, though, if he *didn't* make a
site that is emminently accessible, we'd blast him... so instead it's
got no eye candy...
> > If the client is providing a public service in the UK (also other
> > countries,
> > but the UK is the area I know best) then they're legally bound to be
> > accessible.
>
> I'm not aware of that legal requirement: could you give
> details?
are you in the US?
Section 508 of the Workforce Investment Act, enacted on August
7, 1998
http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/508/508law.html
> Of our Clients doing both B2B and B2C business, their sites are indeed coded
> for accessibility.
accesskeys? full alt attributes? no image maps or frames?
validated HTML and CSS?
> > I would also point out that there are 10m people in the UK with registered
> > disabilities. A reasonable market if I'm not mistaken.
>
> Indeed, although that again depends upon your Client demographic. I wonder
> how many sites written by designers on this list are written to comply with
> Bobby's usability/accessibility in mind?
all mine... all martin's... there are a few others who are very
particular about that... as well as the three levels of WAI
compliance...
> How many sites with DHTML navigation menus pass?
um, none...
> > 3) you've done Usability Testing as part of your development programme?
>
> No, because the Client has not requested that service - usually because of
> budgetary constraints. We don't run focus groups, usability testing
> workshops, etc. unless the Client is willing to pay for them. But then our
> Client base does not want to spend many thousands on their sites either...
i think once you've got a handle on how to build accessible sites
from the start, and experience doing them, building them that way
is no extra cost to the client... no, you can't do full-bore testing
with focus groups, but in our case, all of our sites are accessible
unless the client requests otherwise... even those really low-budget
ones...
From jamie at bayou.com Wed Nov 22 11:07:29 2000
From: jamie at bayou.com (Jamie Madden)
Date: Wed Nov 22 11:07:29 2000
Subject: [thelist] Have A Look
Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20001122110626.00e73b80@mail.bayou.com>
If you evolutionary types have a minute could you look over this site for
me? It's suppose to go live today and I just wanted a little feedback on
the design, navigability, easy of use, etc. Any comments, good or bad, are
welcome. Thanks guys.
jamie
From dbailey2 at healthaxis.com Wed Nov 22 11:08:53 2000
From: dbailey2 at healthaxis.com (Bailey, Dan)
Date: Wed Nov 22 11:08:53 2000
Subject: [thelist] Have A Look
Message-ID: <7171306544DBD31195B900D0B7222A4EE34861@haxcre00.healthaxis.com>
Howabout a URL? :-)
-----Original Message-----
From: Jamie Madden [mailto:jamie at bayou.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2000 12:09 PM
To: thelist at lists.evolt.org
Subject: [thelist] Have A Look
If you evolutionary types have a minute could you look over this site for
me? It's suppose to go live today and I just wanted a little feedback on
the design, navigability, easy of use, etc. Any comments, good or bad, are
welcome. Thanks guys.
jamie
---------------------------------------
For unsubscribe and other options, including
the Tip Harvester and archive of TheList go to:
http://lists.evolt.org Workers of the Web, evolt !
From john at userfrenzy.com Wed Nov 22 11:08:59 2000
From: john at userfrenzy.com (John Handelaar)
Date: Wed Nov 22 11:08:59 2000
Subject: [thelist] Have A Look
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20001122110626.00e73b80@mail.bayou.com>
Message-ID:
What site?
------------------------------------------
John Handelaar
T +44 20 7209 4117 M +44 7930 681789
F +44 870 169 7657 E john at userfrenzy.com
------------------------------------------
> -----Original Message-----
> From: thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org
> [mailto:thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org]On Behalf Of Jamie Madden
> Sent: 22 November 2000 17:09
> To: thelist at lists.evolt.org
> Subject: [thelist] Have A Look
>
>
> If you evolutionary types have a minute could you look over this site for
> me? It's suppose to go live today and I just wanted a little feedback on
> the design, navigability, easy of use, etc. Any comments, good
> or bad, are
> welcome. Thanks guys.
>
> jamie
>
>
> ---------------------------------------
> For unsubscribe and other options, including
> the Tip Harvester and archive of TheList go to:
> http://lists.evolt.org Workers of the Web, evolt !
From jamie at bayou.com Wed Nov 22 11:09:26 2000
From: jamie at bayou.com (Jamie Madden)
Date: Wed Nov 22 11:09:26 2000
Subject: [thelist] Have A Look
Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20001122111003.00e73570@mail.bayou.com>
Damn it, I hate it when that happens. Here's the URL.
http://www.bayou.com/index_new.html
jamie
From Kathleen.Howell-1 at ksc.nasa.gov Wed Nov 22 11:09:43 2000
From: Kathleen.Howell-1 at ksc.nasa.gov (Howell, Katie)
Date: Wed Nov 22 11:09:43 2000
Subject: [thelist] Have A Look
Message-ID: <01A056931BA6D011AE630000F84A80120594E0A0@kscmbs41.ksc.nasa.gov>
URL please?
-----Original Message-----
From: Jamie Madden [mailto:jamie at bayou.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2000 12:09 PM
To: thelist at lists.evolt.org
Subject: [thelist] Have A Look
If you evolutionary types have a minute could you look over this site for
me? It's suppose to go live today and I just wanted a little feedback on
the design, navigability, easy of use, etc. Any comments, good or bad, are
welcome. Thanks guys.
jamie
---------------------------------------
For unsubscribe and other options, including
the Tip Harvester and archive of TheList go to:
http://lists.evolt.org Workers of the Web, evolt !
From sgd at ti3.com Wed Nov 22 11:10:19 2000
From: sgd at ti3.com (Scott Dexter)
Date: Wed Nov 22 11:10:19 2000
Subject: [thelist] Have A Look
Message-ID: <8C8B8745C0FE7A43BFA6CABAB321117223F7D0@gate.ti3.com>
apparently only those of us that have evolved to clairvoyance can look ;)
(URL, please?)
sgd
--
work: http://www.ti3.com/
non: http://thinksafely.org/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jamie Madden [mailto:jamie at bayou.com]
>
> If you evolutionary types have a minute could you look over
> this site for
> me? It's suppose to go live today and I just wanted a little
From martin.p.burns at uk.pwcglobal.com Wed Nov 22 11:10:53 2000
From: martin.p.burns at uk.pwcglobal.com (martin.p.burns at uk.pwcglobal.com)
Date: Wed Nov 22 11:10:53 2000
Subject: [thelist] Dropdowns - good or bad?
Message-ID: <8025699F.005DC290.00@uk-emamta003.ema.pwcinternal.com>
Memo from Martin P Burns of PricewaterhouseCoopers
-------------------- Start of message text --------------------
Please respond to richard.morris at web-designers.co.uk
To: thelist at lists.evolt.org
cc: Martin P Burns/UK/MCS/PwC
Subject: RE: [thelist] Dropdowns - good or bad?
martin.p.burns at uk.pwcglobal.com wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
>> If users don't grok an interface paradigm, they won't use it
>> as effectively, and the communication/commercial aims won't be
>> realised to the same extent. That's the name of the game, surely?
>Apparently not, according to your employers: the pwcglobal.com web site has
>*two* drop-down menus on the home page!!! Pot | Kettle | Black error?
Absolutely. I'm not involved in the design of our site (I'm a consultant)
>> Why do you think that Yahoo gets the traffic it does? It's
>> butt-ugly, but highly usable.
>In a word: content. I actually find it a complete pain in the bum to get to
>anything useful on Yahoo! which is why I don't use it, preferring...
>> Google is even more task centred, and is
>> punching way above its (lack of incumbancy) weight.
>... this one.
ie you prefer the site with the greater usability.
>> Source of figures?
>None whatsoever. Take a look at your company's comms. provision. 14.4k
>modems? I doubt it somehow.
Do I get 56k bandwidth on a 56k modem? Rarely. Do I get 512k bandwidth
on a cable modem. Almost never.
btw, my question was about whether sites will become more whizzy, not whether
I have a 14.4k modem
>> Likely estimation of how many will fail through poor usability?
>Not half as many as through a failure to actually plan a revenue/business
>model.
True, but that's no reason to fail the rest of them.
>Sure, many will fail on usability issues but mainly in the B2C
>environment.
Doubt that - I think poor usability is more significant in B2B where time
really is money. B2Bs tend to have better business models too.
>> Take a look at http://www.work24.co.uk/ - try and register. That will tell
>> you why it's failing. They're getting loads and loads of hits to the front
>> page, but almost no registrations (ie conversions to customers).
>I find those sorts of delays with many back-end driven sites.
The problem (and I ran the research) is actually with the usability. Speed
is one element of that, but by no means the most significant one.
>> Quite the opposite actually. I see sites maturing into greater
>> usability, or
>> failing.
>I fail to believe (in the B2B context especially) that we'll all be
>reverting to basic HTML-only sites like the institutional/research sites
>where content is king.
Usability is not a synonym for 'no design'. Take a look at
Jeff Z's site (http://www.zeldman.com/) - highly usable. Take a look
at http://www.open.gov.uk - highly usable, standards compliant *and*
accessible. Worst case - take a look at my site (http://www.easyweb.co.uk/) -
usable and not exactly Nielsen-ugly.
>> Immature businesses moving online tend to go for whizzy,
>Immature, like Ford, Jaguar, Audi, etc. ?
In web terms, yes. Read back a few days to Bob's post about Jaguar.
Audi's is much better.
And it's whizziness for the sake of whizziness (and winning awards for
the designers) which causes the most problems. Whizziness because
it adds value is a whole other ballgame.
>> I really do see Flash moving towards the area it does best - complicated
>> animated interactivity - and away from replacing HTML in the areas which
>> HTML does extremely well.
>Agreed. I have yet to use Flash for a web site.
I used it for parts of http://www.rbs.co.uk/archives/memorybank/ (quoting
URL from memory), where it added value (and OK, one menu cos we
were requiring users to have it to view the interactive stuff)(
>> If the client is providing a public service in the UK (also other
>> countries,
>> but the UK is the area I know best) then they're legally bound to be
>> accessible.
> I'm not aware of that legal requirement: could you give
>details?
1995 Disability Discrimination Act: http://www.disability.gov.uk/
the same legislation which makes banks/supermarkets install ramps
etc. There's no exemption for web sites - current legal thinking is that
Level A conformance to the W3C WAI guidelines will satisfy the
minimum requirements.
>> I would also point out that there are 10m people in the UK with registered
>> disabilities. A reasonable market if I'm not mistaken.
>Indeed, although that again depends upon your Client demographic. I wonder
>how many sites written by designers on this list are written to comply with
>Bobby's usability/accessibility in mind?
Not enough, even on an experimental basis
>Certainly my company site fails as does PWC's.
+1 on that
> How many sites with DHTML navigation menus pass?
Depends on how it works without DHTML
Cheers
Martin
--------------------- End of message text --------------------
The principal place of business of PricewaterhouseCoopers and its associate
partnerships is 1 Embankment Place, London WC2N 6NN where lists of the
partners' names are available for inspection. All partners in the associate
partnerships are authorised to conduct business as agents of, and all
contracts for services to clients are with, PricewaterhouseCoopers. The UK
firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers is authorised by the Institute of Chartered
Accountants in England and Wales to carry on investment business.
PricewaterhouseCoopers is a member of the world-wide
PricewaterhouseCoopers organisation.
----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which
it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any
review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action
in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
From jamie at bayou.com Wed Nov 22 11:14:12 2000
From: jamie at bayou.com (Jamie Madden)
Date: Wed Nov 22 11:14:12 2000
Subject: [thelist] Have A Look
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20001122110626.00e73b80@mail.bayou.com>
Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20001122111459.00e72100@mail.bayou.com>
Damn It, I hate it when that happens. Here's the URL.
http://www.bayou.com/index_new.html
jamie
At 11:08 AM 11/22/00 -0600, you wrote:
>If you evolutionary types have a minute could you look over this site for
>me? It's suppose to go live today and I just wanted a little feedback on
>the design, navigability, easy of use, etc. Any comments, good or bad,
>are welcome. Thanks guys.
>
>jamie
>
>
>---------------------------------------
>For unsubscribe and other options, including
>the Tip Harvester and archive of TheList go to:
>http://lists.evolt.org Workers of the Web, evolt !
From cewing at mooremedical.com Wed Nov 22 11:16:26 2000
From: cewing at mooremedical.com (Ewing, Christopher)
Date: Wed Nov 22 11:16:26 2000
Subject: [thelist] Have A Look
Message-ID: <017B77D20B91D31199400008C70AE705E30E52@MAILSERV1>
Holy Information Overload Batman!
It strikes me as being a "portal" site on steroids. It's trying to
accomplish a lot but is doing too much at once.
Also the logo is nice, but strikes me as being too large, creating the gap
of "gray" space in the middle of the header area.
Those are my quick comments
Christopher Ewing
Internet Architect
Moore Medical
www.mooremedical.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Jamie Madden [mailto:jamie at bayou.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2000 12:11 PM
To: thelist at lists.evolt.org
Subject: [thelist] Have A Look
Damn it, I hate it when that happens. Here's the URL.
http://www.bayou.com/index_new.html
jamie
---------------------------------------
For unsubscribe and other options, including
the Tip Harvester and archive of TheList go to:
http://lists.evolt.org Workers of the Web, evolt !
From roselli at earthlink.net Wed Nov 22 11:36:04 2000
From: roselli at earthlink.net (aardvark)
Date: Wed Nov 22 11:36:04 2000
Subject: [thelist] Have A Look
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20001122111003.00e73570@mail.bayou.com>
Message-ID: <200011221736.eAMHa3h07027@farmer.oracular.com>
> From: Jamie Madden
>
> http://www.bayou.com/index_new.html
wow... i found a ...
yeah, ok, it's not such a bad use, but i'd use bold or italic, or
another color for the font or cell, but that's just me...
this is gonna be real short...
lotta stuff at the top, but i'll give you credit, it fits in a 640x480, and
the search and calendar are above the fold...
stigma of portal layout, but you do it pretty well... for some reason,
though, the columns aren't as discrete as one would expect...
i'm ignoring the right column... my brain says it's just ad space...
the left column comes across as generic portal stuff (news,
weather, calendars, stocks, etc)... so my brain really only sees the
center...
i don't know what relationship the light blue buttons have, but are
those the only sections of the site? it appears you're an ISP, but
otherwise i'm having trouble figuring out what i can do at this site...
i can get my news elsewhere...
the black text in 'pigskin picks' overlaps the image, making the
leftmost characters impossible to read... strange wrapping for the
kiwanis raffle...
games?
anyway, more shoveling to do...
From matthew at natuzzi.com Wed Nov 22 11:41:05 2000
From: matthew at natuzzi.com (Watkins Matthew)
Date: Wed Nov 22 11:41:05 2000
Subject: [thelist] Have A Look
Message-ID:
Hello Jamie,
My first comment is that you could organise the use of space a bit better.
Perhaps remove that extra grey realestate in the top middle. Putting the
serach bar on one line would reduce the large white spaces on either side.
cheers
Matthew
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jamie Madden [mailto:jamie at bayou.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2000 6:11 PM
> To: thelist at lists.evolt.org
> Subject: [thelist] Have A Look
>
>
> Damn it, I hate it when that happens. Here's the URL.
>
> http://www.bayou.com/index_new.html
>
> jamie
>
>
> ---------------------------------------
> For unsubscribe and other options, including
> the Tip Harvester and archive of TheList go to:
> http://lists.evolt.org Workers of the Web, evolt !
>
From meyer at up.edu Wed Nov 22 11:50:49 2000
From: meyer at up.edu (Erika Meyer)
Date: Wed Nov 22 11:50:49 2000
Subject: Accessibility laws (was RE: [thelist] Dropdowns - good or bad?)
In-Reply-To: <200011221658.eAMGwfh05726@farmer.oracular.com>
References: <8025699F.003382A5.00@uk-emamta003.ema.pwcinternal.com>
<200011221658.eAMGwfh05726@farmer.oracular.com>
Message-ID:
My "not a lawyer" understanding is that at this point in time,
Section 508 applies SPECIFICALLY to "Federal Departments and
Agencies."
Regarding access of public places in the US, I think it is the
Americans with Disabilities Act which is of consideration.
http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/ada/adahom1.htm
In a nutshell:
"The ADA prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in
employment, State and local government, public accommodations,
commercial facilities, transportation, and telecommunications."
http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/ada/cguide.htm
Erika
> > > If the client is providing a public service in the UK (also other
> > > countries,
> > > but the UK is the area I know best) then they're legally bound to be
>> > accessible.
> >
>> I'm not aware of that legal requirement: could you give
>> details?
>
>are you in the US?
>Section 508 of the Workforce Investment Act, enacted on August
>7, 1998
>http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/508/508law.html
>
From roselli at earthlink.net Wed Nov 22 12:09:19 2000
From: roselli at earthlink.net (aardvark)
Date: Wed Nov 22 12:09:19 2000
Subject: Accessibility laws (was RE: [thelist] Dropdowns - good or bad?)
In-Reply-To:
References: <200011221658.eAMGwfh05726@farmer.oracular.com>
Message-ID: <200011221809.eAMI9Ih07755@farmer.oracular.com>
> From: Erika Meyer
>
> My "not a lawyer" understanding is that at this point in time,
> Section 508 applies SPECIFICALLY to "Federal Departments and
> Agencies."
that is absolutely correct... it also impacts organizations that do
business with the federal government, and based on some other
stuff i've read, will most likely cascade to state governments as
well...
> Regarding access of public places in the US, I think it is the
> Americans with Disabilities Act which is of consideration.
> http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/ada/adahom1.htm
yep, this is the one more likely to affect businesses...
i cited section 508 because it's on the books and is clearly aimed
at web sites... there's still no case law to suggest how much it will
impact people, let alone the private sector, but why not plan ahead?
anybody remember how much it cost IBM to make the olympics
site accessible? when much of it was alt attributes that could
have been coded in up-front...
i should have framed it more effectively, but i was posting
legislation clearly aimed at us as developers... but hey, i think i'm
the only local guy who bids on city and county gigs and even
knows this law is on the books...
From richard.morris at web-designers.co.uk Wed Nov 22 12:11:47 2000
From: richard.morris at web-designers.co.uk (Richard H. Morris)
Date: Wed Nov 22 12:11:47 2000
Subject: [thelist] Dropdowns - good or bad?
In-Reply-To: <200011221658.eAMGwfh05726@farmer.oracular.com>
Message-ID:
aardvark [roselli at earthlink.net] noted:
> -----Original Message-----
> > Apparently not, according to your employers: the pwcglobal.com
> web site has
> > *two* drop-down menus on the home page!!! Pot | Kettle | Black error?
>
> you're assuming he has any control over that company's site... i
> would say he doesn't...
I'm *sure* he doesn't: his own site is very much designed and coded for
usability, whereas PWC's is the usual megacorp type.
> look at the crap they auotmatically append
> to his posts, that's not a company that understands the medium...
Lawyer led...
> martin, OTOH, does understand the medium, and much better than
> his (new) employers...
Absolutely.
> i only use it, and google, for searching only, so both are great for
> me... i've learned to tune out all the portal crap...
Me too.
> yes, but i think companies like boo.com are a perfect example of
> how shortsightedness on the UI end as well as the business end
> are both equally as dangerous... turn away customers and you turn
> away *all* sources of revenue...
Quite.
> > > He doesn't claim to be a visual designer. But take a look at
> his traffic
> > > figures... Positive ROI? I think so.
> >
> > In much the same way as the motivational speaker types generate
> business...
>
> LOL... that's a good one... seriously, though, if he *didn't* make a
> site that is emminently accessible, we'd blast him... so instead it's
> got no eye candy...
And it's a case of horses for courses. He's damned if he does make a
visually-appealing site and damned if he doesn't.
> are you in the US?
No, UK.
> Section 508 of the Workforce Investment Act, enacted on August
> 7, 1998
> http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/508/508law.html
I am aware of the US edict (although not conversant with it).
> accesskeys? full alt attributes? no image maps or frames?
> validated HTML and CSS?
Got me there: the ones I'm thinking of have fixed point or pixel sizes as
they were written while I was writing CSS for layout control.
> all mine... all martin's... there are a few others who are very
> particular about that... as well as the three levels of WAI
> compliance...
But again, not the major corporates. Saatchi (IIRC) did a web site for a UK
law firm which was a triumph of style over function to the extent that if
you didn't have fast access or had some disability you couldn't get to any
content at all.
> > How many sites with DHTML navigation menus pass?
>
> um, none...
Quite.
> i think once you've got a handle on how to build accessible sites
> from the start, and experience doing them, building them that way
> is no extra cost to the client... no, you can't do full-bore testing
> with focus groups, but in our case, all of our sites are accessible
> unless the client requests otherwise... even those really low-budget
> ones...
In many ways, the low-budget ones seem to be the most compliant anyway!
Wasn't this all about drop-down menus once? ~;0)
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/
Richard. H. Morris, Web Designers Limited
~~ http://www.web-designers.co.uk ~~
"I'd rather have a full bottle in front of me
than a full frontal lobotomy"
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/
From richard.morris at web-designers.co.uk Wed Nov 22 12:11:50 2000
From: richard.morris at web-designers.co.uk (Richard H. Morris)
Date: Wed Nov 22 12:11:50 2000
Subject: [thelist] Dropdowns - good or bad?
In-Reply-To: <8025699F.005DC290.00@uk-emamta003.ema.pwcinternal.com>
Message-ID:
Martin Burns wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> Absolutely. I'm not involved in the design of our site (I'm a consultant)
I didn't think for a minute that you were ~:0)
> >... this one.
> ie you prefer the site with the greater usability.
..and speed of searching, as it happens.
> btw, my question was about whether sites will become more whizzy,
> not whether
> I have a 14.4k modem
And my response was about the current and future bandwidth available to the
corporates.
> Usability is not a synonym for 'no design'. Take a look at
> Jeff Z's site (http://www.zeldman.com/) - highly usable.
And visually appealing: one of my favourite sites.
> Take a look
> at http://www.open.gov.uk - highly usable, standards compliant *and*
> accessible.
And better, IIRC, than their first attempts at a web site. It's coming along
in leaps and bounds.
> Worst case - take a look at my site
> (http://www.easyweb.co.uk/) -
> usable and not exactly Nielsen-ugly.
Agreed. "Minimalist", I reckon ~;0)
> >Immature, like Ford, Jaguar, Audi, etc. ?
> In web terms, yes. Read back a few days to Bob's post about Jaguar.
I remember it well. The site didn't stop me from registering though ~:0)
> >Agreed. I have yet to use Flash for a web site.
> I used it for parts of http://www.rbs.co.uk/archives/memorybank/ (quoting
> URL from memory), where it added value (and OK, one menu cos we
> were requiring users to have it to view the interactive stuff)(
Would that others didn't follow the lead and add flash where it does add
value. What's the point of a whizbang Flash intro page that tells you
nothing other than "Click here to enter" ?
> >> If the client is providing a public service in the UK (also other
> >> countries,
> >> but the UK is the area I know best) then they're legally bound to be
> >> accessible.
>
> > I'm not aware of that legal requirement:
> could you give
> >details?
> 1995 Disability Discrimination Act: http://www.disability.gov.uk/
> the same legislation which makes banks/supermarkets install ramps
> etc. There's no exemption for web sites - current legal thinking is that
> Level A conformance to the W3C WAI guidelines will satisfy the
> minimum requirements.
I'm aware of the physical access provisions to premises and physical sites
and have been involved in the consultation process (to a limited extent
through business law committees) on the roll-out provisions in relation to
offices and premises and the like with the consequent alterations to
building envelopes.
I can't see how that translates into a legal requirement for disabled access
to a web site though.
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/
Richard. H. Morris, Web Designers Limited
~~ http://www.web-designers.co.uk ~~
"I'd rather have a full bottle in front of me
than a full frontal lobotomy"
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/
From jamie at bayou.com Wed Nov 22 12:12:40 2000
From: jamie at bayou.com (Jamie Madden)
Date: Wed Nov 22 12:12:40 2000
Subject: [thelist] Have A Look
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20001122111003.00e73570@mail.bayou.com>
Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20001122120420.00e7edd0@mail.bayou.com>
Ok, I fixed the blink in the calendar. I know, it bugged me too but I
couldn't think of another way. I've bolded it instead now. I'm gonna work
on adding some more space between sections. No one has to tell me there's
too much information but it is for an ISP that I think finally has seen
that the days of the paid dialup are almost over and they're trying to
build a regional portal so as to supplement income with banner
advertisement. Will it work? Who knows, but these are the things they
want to have on the page. I'm gonna try realigning the section titles left
to aid visibility.
I've got a question about right side advertising. I've seen a few sites
the are putting banner ads down the right side of a page and letting the
content fill 640x480 but you have to scroll to see the ads. 800x600 and up
gets it all. I understand how to do this but I was wondering if anyone
else had noticed this trend and if anyone had any comments on it. It
certainly would allow me to spread things out a little more. 16% of my
current visitors are running in the vicinity of 640x480. 800x600 is at 57%
and eveything else is up from there. Any suggestions?
jamie
At 11:10 AM 11/22/00 -0600, you wrote:
>Damn it, I hate it when that happens. Here's the URL.
>
>http://www.bayou.com/index_new.html
>
>jamie
>
>
>---------------------------------------
>For unsubscribe and other options, including
>the Tip Harvester and archive of TheList go to:
>http://lists.evolt.org Workers of the Web, evolt !
From McCreath_David at xmail.asd.k12.ak.us Wed Nov 22 12:21:11 2000
From: McCreath_David at xmail.asd.k12.ak.us (McCreath_David)
Date: Wed Nov 22 12:21:11 2000
Subject: Accessibility laws (was RE: [thelist] Dropdowns - good or bad
?)
Message-ID: <9627DBCB3063D311BC4B00902785C55F016021E1@EXPO1>
>> My "not a lawyer" understanding is that at this point in time,
>> Section 508 applies SPECIFICALLY to "Federal Departments and
>> Agencies."
>
>that is absolutely correct... it also impacts organizations that do
>business with the federal government, and based on some other
>stuff i've read, will most likely cascade to state governments as
>well...
An additional impact will probably be organizations that benefit from the
government's e-Rate program that subsidizes connectivity (like public
schools and municipal libraries). Our district gets our multiple T-1s and
district-wide network at about half price. Under the Children's Internet
Protection Act (currently languishing in the House, but through the Senate
on wings, and expected to pass the House without difficulty), e-Rate
recipients HAVE to install filters of some kind or lose the subsidy.
According to one reading of the act, non-compliance would also require
repayment of all past e-Rate discounts. In our case that would amount to
literally millions of dollars.
Now I doubt that the accessibility discussion will reach the same fevered
pitch as protecting kiddies from porn, so I don't know that they would
invoke that kind of threat, but I'm hedging my bets and trying to train all
the web builders in my district to think "Accesible First".
Dave
----
home: http://home.gci.net/~mccreath/
work: http://www.asd.k12.ak.us/
From desmoljones at hotmail.com Wed Nov 22 12:31:12 2000
From: desmoljones at hotmail.com (M. Hannan)
Date: Wed Nov 22 12:31:12 2000
Subject: [thelist] OT: Triumphant Return
Message-ID:
After a year and a half absence (I can't remember why I left) I'm announcing
my triumphant return to thelist. I hope I can be as enlightening as I am
enlightened by y'all.
m@ (formerly jksfan).
When setting the background of dynamic layers don't forget
(background-color: for IE) || (layer-background-color: for Netscape), one of
these things is not like the other.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com
From roselli at earthlink.net Wed Nov 22 12:43:37 2000
From: roselli at earthlink.net (aardvark)
Date: Wed Nov 22 12:43:37 2000
Subject: [thelist] Dropdowns - good or bad?
In-Reply-To:
References: <200011221658.eAMGwfh05726@farmer.oracular.com>
Message-ID: <200011221843.eAMIhbh08589@farmer.oracular.com>
> From: "Richard H. Morris"
[...]
> > all mine... all martin's... there are a few others who are very
> > particular about that... as well as the three levels of WAI
> > compliance...
>
> But again, not the major corporates. Saatchi (IIRC) did a web site for a UK
> law firm which was a triumph of style over function to the extent that if
> you didn't have fast access or had some disability you couldn't get to any
> content at all.
that's what pisses me off... these corps should know better, hell,
they have research staff, and the ability to hire contractors based
on more than eye candy... places like mine could easily do what
those firms did, and do it better and cheaper... but we didn't have
the right buzz to get in there...
grumble...
[...]
> Wasn't this all about drop-down menus once? ~;0)
yeah... but we had more fun with this...
From roselli at earthlink.net Wed Nov 22 12:44:37 2000
From: roselli at earthlink.net (aardvark)
Date: Wed Nov 22 12:44:37 2000
Subject: [thelist] Have A Look
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20001122120420.00e7edd0@mail.bayou.com>
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20001122111003.00e73570@mail.bayou.com>
Message-ID: <200011221844.eAMIiah08648@farmer.oracular.com>
> From: Jamie Madden
[...]
> I've got a question about right side advertising. I've seen a few sites
> the are putting banner ads down the right side of a page and letting the
> content fill 640x480 but you have to scroll to see the ads. 800x600 and up
> gets it all. I understand how to do this but I was wondering if anyone
> else had noticed this trend and if anyone had any comments on it. It
> certainly would allow me to spread things out a little more. 16% of my
> current visitors are running in the vicinity of 640x480. 800x600 is at 57%
> and eveything else is up from there. Any suggestions?
i'd say, given those numbers and the ultimate goal of the site, that
that approach would be acceptable... yesterday i cited CNN as an
example of someone who does something similar... i never see
anything on the right because i surf in 640-wide windows (on a
1280x1024 display), but i don't miss it...
so, if you choose to abandon 640x480, and you can't do it liquid,
then that would be a logical next step, IMO...
although my opinion is often based on a magic eight ball...
From lemurs at extremezone.com Wed Nov 22 13:13:12 2000
From: lemurs at extremezone.com (the head lemur)
Date: Wed Nov 22 13:13:12 2000
Subject: [thelist] Re: Accessibility laws
References: <8025699F.003382A5.00@uk-emamta003.ema.pwcinternal.com><200011221658.eAMGwfh05726@farmer.oracular.com>
Message-ID: <004601c054b9$3060b120$c91df5cc@sigrid>
I wrote an article on accessibility last year for a list apart
Accessibility: the clock is ticking. This article outlined Section 508 of
the Workforce Investment Act of 1998, where it came from and what it was
supposed to accomplish.
They do not apply to personal or commercial sites. You can still build sites
anyway you want to.
These rules were to be finished by Feb. 7, and become law on August 8, 2000.
The regulations pertained to US Federal websites, which by the latest count
number over 20,000. These regulations were an outgrowth of the Americans
with Disabilities Act. The ADA requires goverment agencies to provide
services and information to all citizens in a form they can understand, such
as braille formats for the blind. The ADA also required places of Public
Accommodation to provide accessibility as well.
It is November 3, 2000 and these regulations may be buried forever.
I wrote an opinion last month on how these regulations were buried.
http://www.lemurzone.com/edit/converse30.htm
This is a snippet from the Military Construction Appropriations Act for
Fiscal Year 2001 (HR. 4425; P.L. 106-246; July 13, 2000)
SEC. 2405. Section 508(f)(1) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C.
794d(f)(1)) is amended--
(1) in subparagraph (A), by striking `Effective' and all that follows
through `1998,' and inserting `Effective 6 months after the date of
publication by the Access Board of final standards described in subsection
(a)(2),'; and
The deleted portion--(A) COMPLAINTS.--Effective 2 years after the date of
enactment of the Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1998, any individual with
a disability may file a complaint alleging that a Federal department or
agency fails to comply with subsection (a)(1) in providing electronic and
information technology.
(2) in subparagraph (B), by striking `2 years' and all that follows and
inserting `6 months after the date of publication by the Access Board of
final standards described in subsection (a)(2).'.
The deleted portion--(B) APPLICATION.--This subsection shall apply only to
electronic and information technology that is procured by a Federal
department or agency not less than 2 years after the date of enactment of
the Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1998.
This legislation which is now law, effectively cuts the legs from the
Section 508 regulations regarding web site accessibility for the disabled.
Two points that come to mind immediately.
There is no end date. This will under most circumstances, allow a group to
disguise "motion as activity" by holding meetings, generate interim reports
and collect a check.
There is no accountability. There is nothing in the regulations as
originally written that would create an undue burden on the government, with
the testimony given, with the accessibility standards that were used as a
guide in 1998.
A lot of folks code for different browsers to use "features", play the
javascript browser sniffing game, building different versions of the same
site, build sites in Flash, present material in .pdf formats, and spend time
working with the W3C Standards, HTML 4.0, CSS 1, CSS 2, and the emerging
XML.
We bleed a lot when we build these things only to be hit with rendering
problems, browser incompatibilities that sacrifice Standards for "features",
and incomplete support that would enable us to build rich, compliant, and
accessible sites.
I'm not whining here, just pointing out what happens every time we attempt
anything more complicated than using 'heading' and 'p'tags.
From george.dillon at ukonline.co.uk Wed Nov 22 13:24:33 2000
From: george.dillon at ukonline.co.uk (George Dillon)
Date: Wed Nov 22 13:24:33 2000
Subject: [thelist] What does '_vti_' in my access logs mean?
References: <8C8B8745C0FE7A43BFA6CABAB321117223F7CF@gate.ti3.com>
Message-ID: <000b01c054b9$de031200$f4cc2cc3@athlon800>
> The post is someone actually updating a file (or attempting to)
>
> anything with _vti is an MS FrontPage Extensions directory/file. The FP
> Extensions are server-side CGI's that the FP editor (and InterDev) use to
> manage the site. A nice thing about the .NET stuff coming out is you don't
> have to use them to update files =)
>
> George, how do you update pages?
Certainly not with FP!!! I design offline with various tools and then
upload with an FTP app. I guess this is either someone attempting a hack of
some kind, or accidentally trying to edit the page rather than view it.
Thanks for the info guys :o)
George
From chris at fuseware.com Wed Nov 22 13:34:37 2000
From: chris at fuseware.com (chris at fuseware.com)
Date: Wed Nov 22 13:34:37 2000
Subject: [thelist] What does '_vti_' in my access logs mean?
In-Reply-To: <000b01c054b9$de031200$f4cc2cc3@athlon800>
Message-ID: <000601c054bb$24e4b600$f918800a@VSCLTCOL0054>
Probably somebody probing for security holes. If you don't run Frontpage, I
wouldn't worry about it.
Chris Evans
Webmaster, Victoria's Secret Catalog
http://www.VictoriasSecret.com
cevans at vscat.com
-----Original Message-----
From: thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org
[mailto:thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org]On Behalf Of George Dillon
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2000 2:25 PM
To: thelist at lists.evolt.org
Subject: Re: [thelist] What does '_vti_' in my access logs mean?
> The post is someone actually updating a file (or attempting to)
>
> anything with _vti is an MS FrontPage Extensions directory/file. The FP
> Extensions are server-side CGI's that the FP editor (and InterDev) use to
> manage the site. A nice thing about the .NET stuff coming out is you don't
> have to use them to update files =)
>
> George, how do you update pages?
Certainly not with FP!!! I design offline with various tools and then
upload with an FTP app. I guess this is either someone attempting a hack of
some kind, or accidentally trying to edit the page rather than view it.
Thanks for the info guys :o)
George
---------------------------------------
For unsubscribe and other options, including
the Tip Harvester and archive of TheList go to:
http://lists.evolt.org Workers of the Web, evolt !
From xslf at xslf.com Wed Nov 22 13:50:33 2000
From: xslf at xslf.com (Shoshannah Forbes)
Date: Wed Nov 22 13:50:33 2000
Subject: [thelist] a blonde table question
Message-ID: <003c01c054bd$d166c7e0$dc9bfea9@xslf>
I am felling blonde right now...
I have a blue table at the bottom of the page of
http://forbes.co.il/dev/sahar/
I need it to cling to the bottom. It works fine with 800X600, but at
1024X768 I have a gap at the bottom of the window. How do I get rid of it?
(See
http://forbes.co.il/dev/sahar/images/sahar_page.gif
for how the bottom of the page should look like )
Thanks,
Shoshannah Forbes
--
Hebrew services for site owners http://www.bool.co.il
Moderator, site builder forum http://forums.nana.co.il/forum.asp?id=17
Personal site: http://www.forbes.co.il
From jjsolari at pobox.com Wed Nov 22 14:30:22 2000
From: jjsolari at pobox.com (J.J.SOLARI)
Date: Wed Nov 22 14:30:22 2000
Subject: [thelist] screen resolution sniffing
Message-ID: <20001122213012-r01010600-b7c3365a@10.0.1.2>
On Tue, 21 Nov 2000 18:51:42 -0500, "Ron Jourard"
wrote:
>Message: 23
>From: "Ron Jourard"
>To:
>Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 18:51:42 -0500
>charset="iso-8859-1"
>Subject: [thelist] screen resolution sniffing
>Reply-To: thelist at lists.evolt.org
>
>I am building a 600 x 800 site that's also viewable at larger screen
>resolutions.
>
>Any opinions on javacript detecting whether visitors have their
>resolution set at 480 x 640 and directing them to a smaller site? Any
>comments on things to watch out for in implementation etc.?
>
>Ron Jourard
>Canada
>www.defencelaw.com
Ron,
Just seen such detection on this site:
Basically, the script gets user available browser window size and upon
this action builds appropriate content (table).
There is also a "noscript" for visitors without javascript which offers
minimal navigation means.
If you go deeper in this site at:
you would see further application with frames this time, particularly
navigation frame at:
Not much more advice except that, following this path, you'll absolutely
have to leave doors open for those with "less features".
hih,
JJS.
--
/* public key id: 9eb99ddb */
/* homepage */
From sam at sam-i-am.com Wed Nov 22 14:38:48 2000
From: sam at sam-i-am.com (Sam-I-Am)
Date: Wed Nov 22 14:38:48 2000
Subject: [thelist] a blonde table question
References: <003c01c054bd$d166c7e0$dc9bfea9@xslf>
Message-ID: <3A1C2EE6.5E079BF6@sam-i-am.com>
> I have a blue table at the bottom of the page of
> http://forbes.co.il/dev/sahar/
>
> I need it to cling to the bottom. It works fine with 800X600, but at
> 1024X768 I have a gap at the bottom of the window. How do I get rid of it?
I currently working on some prototype templates that do this.
The bottom table hugs the bottom of the browser window - even when the
window is much taller than the content.
I had been working on a dHTML type solution, but opted instead for a
simple tables one.
My main table (that hold the content and need to flow from the top of
the window) has a height attribute of around 90% - 98% (depending on
what bottom margin you want). The main content row has a height
attribute of 100% (100% of the available height, which is 90% of the
window height). The footer table (which is discrete) simply follows the
main table.
It works well for most but not all browsers. In particular NN6 ignores
my height attributes, so far.
hth, sorry haven't got an url I can show you right now.. in a day or 2
maybe.
Sam
From sgd at ti3.com Wed Nov 22 14:42:16 2000
From: sgd at ti3.com (Scott Dexter)
Date: Wed Nov 22 14:42:16 2000
Subject: [thelist] digital camera shopping
Message-ID: <8C8B8745C0FE7A43BFA6CABAB321117223F7D8@gate.ti3.com>
mildly on-topic (I'm an optimist ;) )
I'm awanting a digital camera, but not a fancy schmancy print quality one
(if I have too, I could borrow one of those from my pro-photo neighbor
(http://sebron.com)), but a basic "hey that needs a pic!" kinda digital
camera. I been cruising though Amazon's selections, and figger I'm in the
subUS$200 range, any of you kids have recommendations?
(making my Christmas wish-list =) )
sgd
--
work: http://www.ti3.com/
non: http://thinksafely.org/
From meyer at up.edu Wed Nov 22 14:43:03 2000
From: meyer at up.edu (Erika Meyer)
Date: Wed Nov 22 14:43:03 2000
Subject: [thelist] a blonde table question
In-Reply-To: <003c01c054bd$d166c7e0$dc9bfea9@xslf>
References: <003c01c054bd$d166c7e0$dc9bfea9@xslf>
Message-ID:
>I am felling blonde right now...
is that why you're having trouble with spilling?
Since I actually AM blonde, let me try to answer.
Why don't you set the background color to blue, and set the margins
to "0" and then make the top row(s) have a beige background. The
bottom rows would be blue, to blend in with the background color.
What do you think?
Erika
>I have a blue table at the bottom of the page of
>http://forbes.co.il/dev/sahar/
>
>I need it to cling to the bottom. It works fine with 800X600, but at
>1024X768 I have a gap at the bottom of the window. How do I get rid of it?
>
>(See
>http://forbes.co.il/dev/sahar/images/sahar_page.gif
>for how the bottom of the page should look like )
>
>Thanks,
>Shoshannah Forbes
From meyer at up.edu Wed Nov 22 14:44:51 2000
From: meyer at up.edu (Erika Meyer)
Date: Wed Nov 22 14:44:51 2000
Subject: [thelist] a blonde table question
In-Reply-To: <3A1C2EE6.5E079BF6@sam-i-am.com>
References: <003c01c054bd$d166c7e0$dc9bfea9@xslf>
<3A1C2EE6.5E079BF6@sam-i-am.com>
Message-ID:
>It works well for most but not all browsers. In particular NN6 ignores
>my height attributes, so far.
maybe because there is no such thing as a "height" attribute?
Erika
From jaylard at equilon.com Wed Nov 22 14:51:43 2000
From: jaylard at equilon.com (Aylard JA (James))
Date: Wed Nov 22 14:51:43 2000
Subject: [thelist] a blonde table question
Message-ID: <8B8252E8924BD31193D800805FE63E6D0104CCF1@mzrmsx02.newcos.com>
Sam-I-Am,
> It works well for most but not all browsers. In particular NN6 ignores
> my height attributes, so far.
That's because "height" is a valid HTML 4 attribute only on the
and elements, as far as tables are concerned (and it's deprecated for
both of those). For Netscape 6, however, this would be an excellent
opportunity to use the "fixed" value for the CSS "position" attribute, which
would allow you to maintain your bottom table at a constant position in the
browser window, regardless of scrolling (much like using frames).
Unfortunately, not even IE 5.5 supports position: fixed, so some kind of
browser detection would be necessary.
hth,
James Aylard
From desmoljones at hotmail.com Wed Nov 22 14:53:42 2000
From: desmoljones at hotmail.com (M. Hannan)
Date: Wed Nov 22 14:53:42 2000
Subject: [thelist] digital camera shopping
Message-ID:
Beware the sub-200's...or at least expect to get what you pay for. The
640x480 crapameras are a shoe-in to disappoint. If you can squeeze the
money out of your piggybank then get at least a 1 megapixel camera...which
is decent but not wowish. 2x megapixels are great to write home about, 3.3
is ohmygawdlookithat.
Features and format are more important than brand name. Standard smart
cards are best, tiff/jpeg are better than proprietary format (don't get
anything that's not a standard 4:3 ratio either, those are just plain
weird). USB is a plus. That being said I'm partial to Olympus.
m@
Digital cameras are great, but don't pull a pic off your your 3.3
megagooglepixel camera onto your PIIII/6trillion and upload it to your site
via your DSL connection then tell all your friends stuck in 56k land to
"look at this"....chances are that a year-and-a-half later they'll see
640x480 (or 800x600) of a dark corner of a great picture that is 6000 times
larger than their screen resolution.
>From: Scott Dexter
>Reply-To: thelist at lists.evolt.org
>To: "Evolt (E-mail)"
>Subject: [thelist] digital camera shopping
>Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 14:42:30 -0600
>
>mildly on-topic (I'm an optimist ;) )
>
>I'm awanting a digital camera, but not a fancy schmancy print quality one
>(if I have too, I could borrow one of those from my pro-photo neighbor
>(http://sebron.com)), but a basic "hey that needs a pic!" kinda digital
>camera. I been cruising though Amazon's selections, and figger I'm in the
>subUS$200 range, any of you kids have recommendations?
>
>(making my Christmas wish-list =) )
>sgd
>--
>work: http://www.ti3.com/
>non: http://thinksafely.org/
>
>---------------------------------------
>For unsubscribe and other options, including
>the Tip Harvester and archive of TheList go to:
>http://lists.evolt.org Workers of the Web, evolt !
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com
From meyer at up.edu Wed Nov 22 15:02:05 2000
From: meyer at up.edu (Erika Meyer)
Date: Wed Nov 22 15:02:05 2000
Subject: [thelist] a blonde table question
In-Reply-To: <8B8252E8924BD31193D800805FE63E6D0104CCF1@mzrmsx02.newcos.com>
References: <8B8252E8924BD31193D800805FE63E6D0104CCF1@mzrmsx02.newcos.com>
Message-ID:
I used a bottom-fixed background here:
http://www.seastorm.com/notprint/
(it's unfinished/experimental/a rant).
it works on IE5 Mac, too. Not NN4, of course.
Erika
>For Netscape 6, however, this would be an excellent
>opportunity to use the "fixed" value for the CSS "position" attribute, which
>would allow you to maintain your bottom table at a constant position in the
>browser window, regardless of scrolling (much like using frames).
>Unfortunately, not even IE 5.5 supports position: fixed, so some kind of
>browser detection would be necessary.
>
>hth,
>James Aylard
From martin.p.burns at uk.pwcglobal.com Wed Nov 22 15:02:53 2000
From: martin.p.burns at uk.pwcglobal.com (martin.p.burns at uk.pwcglobal.com)
Date: Wed Nov 22 15:02:53 2000
Subject: [thelist] Dropdowns - good or bad?
Message-ID: <8025699F.00734BD0.00@uk-emamta003.ema.pwcinternal.com>
Memo from Martin P Burns of PricewaterhouseCoopers
-------------------- Start of message text --------------------
Please respond to thelist at lists.evolt.org
To: thelist at lists.evolt.org
cc: roselli at earthlink.net
Subject: RE: [thelist] Dropdowns - good or bad?
aardvark [roselli at earthlink.net] noted:
>> are you in the US?
>No, UK.
See my previous comments about the UK's Disability Discrimination
Act
>> all mine... all martin's... there are a few others who are very
>> particular about that... as well as the three levels of WAI
>> compliance...
>But again, not the major corporates.
That's because there hasn't been a UK case brought (yet). Look
at the AOL case in the US. $1m in out-of-court settlement, plus probably
5 times that in development costs to make their software compliant.
I think that http://www.smile.co.uk/ are going to get a *major* kicking
over this - not only are they a bank (banks are specifically mentioned
in the legislation), but their parent company have a long track record
of supporting social justice initiatives.
You can't use the smile service without Java - non-reliance on client-
executed applications is about 1st on the WAI Priority 1 list.
That said, anyone got any idea how well screen readers cope with
https?
>> i think once you've got a handle on how to build accessible sites
> from the start, and experience doing them, building them that way
>> is no extra cost to the client... no, you can't do full-bore testing
>> with focus groups, but in our case, all of our sites are accessible
>> unless the client requests otherwise... even those really low-budget
>> ones...
Absolutely - it's like going from point A to point C: it's easier to go via
point B on the way, rather than back to it.
>In many ways, the low-budget ones seem to be the most compliant anyway!
The high-budget ones are generally managed by people unlike us,
who don't understand this stuff, and view it as an unnecessary cost.
This will change.
Cheers
Martin
--------------------- End of message text --------------------
The principal place of business of PricewaterhouseCoopers and its associate
partnerships is 1 Embankment Place, London WC2N 6NN where lists of the
partners' names are available for inspection. All partners in the associate
partnerships are authorised to conduct business as agents of, and all
contracts for services to clients are with, PricewaterhouseCoopers. The UK
firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers is authorised by the Institute of Chartered
Accountants in England and Wales to carry on investment business.
PricewaterhouseCoopers is a member of the world-wide
PricewaterhouseCoopers organisation.
----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which
it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any
review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action
in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
From martin.p.burns at uk.pwcglobal.com Wed Nov 22 15:02:56 2000
From: martin.p.burns at uk.pwcglobal.com (martin.p.burns at uk.pwcglobal.com)
Date: Wed Nov 22 15:02:56 2000
Subject: [thelist] Dropdowns - good or bad?
Message-ID: <8025699F.00734BD1.00@uk-emamta003.ema.pwcinternal.com>
Memo from Martin P Burns of PricewaterhouseCoopers
-------------------- Start of message text --------------------
Please respond to thelist at lists.evolt.org
To: thelist at lists.evolt.org
cc:
Subject: RE: [thelist] Dropdowns - good or bad?
Martin Burns wrote:
> >Agreed. I have yet to use Flash for a web site.
>> I used it for parts of http://www.rbs.co.uk/archives/memorybank/ (quoting
>> URL from memory), where it added value (and OK, one menu cos we
>> were requiring users to have it to view the interactive stuff)(
>Would that others didn't follow the lead and add flash where it does add
>value. What's the point of a whizbang Flash intro page that tells you
>nothing other than "Click here to enter" ?
A lovely spoof is http://www.skipintro.com/
>> 1995 Disability Discrimination Act: http://www.disability.gov.uk/
>> the same legislation which makes banks/supermarkets install ramps
>> etc. There's no exemption for web sites - current legal thinking is that
>> Level A conformance to the W3C WAI guidelines will satisfy the
>> minimum requirements.
>I'm aware of the physical access provisions to premises and physical sites
>and have been involved in the consultation process (to a limited extent
>through business law committees) on the roll-out provisions in relation to
>offices and premises and the like with the consequent alterations to
>building envelopes.
>I can't see how that translates into a legal requirement for disabled access
>to a web site though.
There's no exemption for web sites. All the legislation mentions is 'services
to the public', with a few examples (banking, supermarkets etc), noting that
the list is not exclusive.
The legal advice I had in the summer was that it absolutely covered web
sites (it was a "Holy shit!" moment for the lawyer in question - I brought it
to her attention)
Cheers
Martin
--------------------- End of message text --------------------
The principal place of business of PricewaterhouseCoopers and its associate
partnerships is 1 Embankment Place, London WC2N 6NN where lists of the
partners' names are available for inspection. All partners in the associate
partnerships are authorised to conduct business as agents of, and all
contracts for services to clients are with, PricewaterhouseCoopers. The UK
firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers is authorised by the Institute of Chartered
Accountants in England and Wales to carry on investment business.
PricewaterhouseCoopers is a member of the world-wide
PricewaterhouseCoopers organisation.
----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which
it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any
review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action
in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
From jaylard at equilon.com Wed Nov 22 15:14:17 2000
From: jaylard at equilon.com (Aylard JA (James))
Date: Wed Nov 22 15:14:17 2000
Subject: [thelist] a blonde table question
Message-ID: <8B8252E8924BD31193D800805FE63E6D0104CCF2@mzrmsx02.newcos.com>
> I used a bottom-fixed background here:
> http://www.seastorm.com/notprint/
Yes, for backgrounds, you can used a "fixed" value going back to IE
3 (although with IE 3 it has to either be rolled into a shorthand
"background" property -- as opposed to the stand-alone
"background-attachment" property -- or it has to be in the form of the
IE-proprietary "bgproperties" attribute of the element). The effect
of "position: fixed" is the same, except that you can apply it to
essentially anything -- it's awesome.
James Aylard
From jasonb at halstead-architects.com Wed Nov 22 15:40:41 2000
From: jasonb at halstead-architects.com (Jason E. Burk)
Date: Wed Nov 22 15:40:41 2000
Subject: [thelist] digital camera shopping
References: <8C8B8745C0FE7A43BFA6CABAB321117223F7D8@gate.ti3.com>
Message-ID: <3A1C681F.4183D77F@halstead-architects.com>
http://www.mercata.com
is all i can say & right now if you sign up with passport (MSN) you get 20%
off stuff at mercata.
check it out.
> I'm awanting a digital camera, but not a fancy schmancy print quality one
as far as what to get, i was on a trip overseas where a lot of people brought
their digital cameras (over 1 million total images for sure, man). we had
everything from the nikon's with little memory cards (the cards are quite
expensivo if you ask me) to the big sony's with the floppy disk insert. i
personally like the floppy disk type because film is cheap (use all those old
floppys that are going bonkers soon anyway) but the nikons with memory cards
shot at resolutions up to 1500 x whatever that would actually print at 3 x 5
on a decent quality printer and look OK -- i find that one colorful, high
quality image on the sony (floppy type) use 1 disk per picture (ouch).
the point & shoot style, memory card cams are probably better for versatility
tho, since they are fairly small and don't require you to carry a hundred
floppy's around, getting beat up in your pockets...if you check out mercata i
know they have some wonderful deals right now on the type of camera you're
looking for.
hth.
jason
*************************************************
j a s o n e . b u r k
http://www.bsu.edu/World2000/research/burk/
HALSTEAD|architects
www.halstead-architects.com
jasonb at halstead-architects.com
[ jdog at 020.co.uk ]
icq # | 33425254
From roselli at earthlink.net Wed Nov 22 15:55:26 2000
From: roselli at earthlink.net (aardvark)
Date: Wed Nov 22 15:55:26 2000
Subject: [thelist] digital camera shopping
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID: <3A1BF8C6.29045.3CFE894D@localhost>
> From: "M. Hannan"
>
> Beware the sub-200's...or at least expect to get what you pay for. The
> 640x480 crapameras are a shoe-in to disappoint. If you can squeeze the
[...]
> Features and format are more important than brand name. Standard smart
> cards are best, tiff/jpeg are better than proprietary format (don't get
> anything that's not a standard 4:3 ratio either, those are just plain
> weird). USB is a plus. That being said I'm partial to Olympus.
i'll second all this... after much research (you may remember me
commenting on this in the past) for a $300-ish camera for my
brother to take overseas (to use with that oft-cited text-based CMS
i made), i ended up recommending the Olympus D340 R... i think
there is a newer model out...
good color, clarity, brightness, etc... the software to get it to your
PC can be wonky, and his wasn't y2k-friendly, but he downloaded
a patch... he didn't want USB, either, but i think they have USB
now...
anyway, you can see sample images at http://roselli.org/tour/
(recently he posted a good, odd, set at
http://roselli.org/tour/entry.asp?articleID=1000114&folder=11_2000,
all taken with that camera and posted after run through a droplet i
gave him)...
> Digital cameras are great, but don't pull a pic off your your 3.3
> megagooglepixel camera onto your PIIII/6trillion and upload it to your site
> via your DSL connection then tell all your friends stuck in 56k land to
> "look at this"....chances are that a year-and-a-half later they'll see
[...]
that web photo gallery option in Photoshop 5 is a great 5-second
way to post them hi-res pics without them being fat files... you may
not like the HTML (i don't), but who cares if it's among friends...?
From sgd at ti3.com Wed Nov 22 16:26:35 2000
From: sgd at ti3.com (Scott Dexter)
Date: Wed Nov 22 16:26:35 2000
Subject: [thelist] digital camera shopping
Message-ID: <8C8B8745C0FE7A43BFA6CABAB321117223F7DC@gate.ti3.com>
I've been reading much about the Olympus D-360L --a CNET editor's choice,
btw-- looks like I might head in this direction. Aardie, I've seen the pics
from your bro (but I seem to have missed the discourse on choosing a
camera), so I think I'm sold.
Found it for US$229, gonna go ask Santa if she wants to deliver it early =)
It still uses a serial cable to d/l pics, but a co-worker mentioned he
bought a 64MB memory card for his Nikon and it came with a USB cradle to d/l
direct from the card. Pretty slick... just spent an extra 45 seconds and
Olympus makes a solo SmartMedia-USB cradle accessory --US$57....
thanks kids--
sgd
--
work: http://www.ti3.com/
non: http://thinksafely.org/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: aardvark [mailto:roselli at earthlink.net]
> i made), i ended up recommending the Olympus D340 R... i think
> there is a newer model out...
>
> good color, clarity, brightness, etc... the software to get
> it to your
> PC can be wonky, and his wasn't y2k-friendly, but he downloaded
> a patch... he didn't want USB, either, but i think they have USB
> now...
From richard.morris at web-designers.co.uk Wed Nov 22 16:27:03 2000
From: richard.morris at web-designers.co.uk (Richard H. Morris)
Date: Wed Nov 22 16:27:03 2000
Subject: [thelist] Dropdowns - good or bad?
In-Reply-To: <200011221843.eAMIhbh08589@farmer.oracular.com>
Message-ID:
aardvark [roselli at earthlink.net] wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> > But again, not the major corporates. Saatchi (IIRC) did a web
> site for a UK
> > law firm which was a triumph of style over function to the
> extent that if
> > you didn't have fast access or had some disability you couldn't
> get to any
> > content at all.
>
> that's what pisses me off... these corps should know better, hell,
> they have research staff, and the ability to hire contractors based
> on more than eye candy... places like mine could easily do what
> those firms did, and do it better and cheaper... but we didn't have
> the right buzz to get in there...
>
> grumble...
~:0) They've now merged with another firm and the new site is slightly more
traditional.
> > Wasn't this all about drop-down menus once? ~;0)
>
> yeah... but we had more fun with this...
LOL!
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/
Richard. H. Morris, Web Designers Limited
~~ http://www.web-designers.co.uk ~~
"I'd rather have a full bottle in front of me
than a full frontal lobotomy"
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/
From david_shadovitz at xontech.com Wed Nov 22 17:34:39 2000
From: david_shadovitz at xontech.com (David Shadovitz)
Date: Wed Nov 22 17:34:39 2000
Subject: [thelist] Anti-Netscape tips
Message-ID: <3A1C5AB9.79031B61@xontech.com>
I owe, so here are two things I learned today. Apologies if these are
well-known issues.
-David
Consider these two hidden form elements:
In IE 5.0, the action page sees the value of each of these elements as
"".
In Netscape 4.5, the action page sees the value of the 1st one as " "
and the 2nd as "".
Netscape's differentiation between these two was a surprise to me.
If you don't want to use the value attribute, make sure your action page
trims the form elements.
As of JS 1.1, options may be created dynamically, like so:
new Option(text, value[, defaultSelected, selected])
The last two arguments are optional and specify whether the new option
is selected.
I found that Netscape 4.5 & 4.7 disregard the values of those two
arguments and always select a new option created this way! IE 5.0 obeys
the rules. You can get around the problem by omitting these arguments
and then setting the new option's properties.
Here's a page demonstrating the flaw, if my HTML gets through:
From bb at misspixel.com Wed Nov 22 17:48:03 2000
From: bb at misspixel.com (Miss Pixel)
Date: Wed Nov 22 17:48:03 2000
Subject: [thelist] digital camera shopping
References: <8C8B8745C0FE7A43BFA6CABAB321117223F7D8@gate.ti3.com>
Message-ID: <00e101c054de$a927bac0$e1bafea9@pixelpc>
You're better off spending $300 for something that takes real pictures, like
an Olympus 360L, which takes beautiful shots.
Check comparisons here:
http://www.imaging-resource.com/DIGCAM01.HTM
It's very enlightening. In addition to specs and prices, sample photos from
nearly every available model are there.
From webshot at neoncowboy.com Wed Nov 22 18:05:11 2000
From: webshot at neoncowboy.com (John Corry)
Date: Wed Nov 22 18:05:11 2000
Subject: [thelist] digital camera shopping
In-Reply-To: <00e101c054de$a927bac0$e1bafea9@pixelpc>
Message-ID:
> You're better off spending $300 for something that takes real
> pictures,
Here..here..miss pixel,
I hear many people refer to 'mega-pixel' as if it were the sole measuring
stick by which digital cameras ought be measured. Remember that all of those
pixels will only be as well 'exposed' as the instrument that 'exposes' them.
Optics are of unparalleled importance.
I bought a Sony DSC d770 a few months ago and have been really pleased with
the results. It has a killer lens, is fast (while manually focused anyway,
the AF is slow. real slow.) and uses slick memory stick media.
> Check comparisons here:
>
> http://www.imaging-resource.com/DIGCAM01.HTM
>
> It's very enlightening. In addition to specs and prices, sample
> photos from
> nearly every available model are there.
DSC d770 review here...
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/D770/D770A.HTM
buy.com had 'em marked way down ($740) in September.
http://www.buy.com
happy thanksgiving to all,
jc
From miinx at miinx.com.au Wed Nov 22 18:09:47 2000
From: miinx at miinx.com.au (miinx)
Date: Wed Nov 22 18:09:47 2000
Subject: [thelist] table cell troubles in Netscape
References:
Message-ID: <3A1C5F98.386B3B25@miinx.com.au>
Lisa Bartholomew wrote:
> http://www.koolfish.com/jake/index.html
>
> If you want to see what it should look like view in Explorer. I have the
> table cells set to the correct width so why is Netscape creating the cell
> larger than it should be?
You're cell widths for the row in question actually don't add up to the width
of the table... 8+338+14 = 360, yet your table def is width=358. I'd fix this
first - that's enough to throw NS out.
HTH
Karen
--
http://www.miinx.com.au/
http://www.monkey.com.au/
From taracleveland at hotmail.com Wed Nov 22 19:13:38 2000
From: taracleveland at hotmail.com (Tara Cleveland)
Date: Wed Nov 22 19:13:38 2000
Subject: [thelist] Anyone want a pint?
Message-ID:
Hi all,
I'm flying from Toronto over to the other side of the pond on Sunday
night/Monday morning for the Jakob Nielsen conference in London on Tuesday,
Wednesday and Thursday. I'll be going to Manchester for the weekend though
(gotta visit my grandma). I'd love to meet some of the Londoners or
Mancunians on the list. Does anyone want to go for a pint sometime next
week?
You can email me off list taracleveland at hotmail.com (I'm on the digest).
Tara
If you get a chance, go to an Adobe presentation on Photoshop 6. There's
lots of tips and tricks that they tell you about that aren't in the manual.
For instance (a rather inane example, actually), the original name for this
release is "Venus in Furs" the band name of one of the Photoshop guys. You
can find an Easter egg screen for it on a Mac by (I think) option clicking
on the About Photoshop menu item or on the startup screen (I'm trying to
remember from the presentation because I don't have PS6 yet). But really go
to a presentation because they do tell you a whole bunch of useful things, I
promise.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com
From isaac at members.evolt.org Wed Nov 22 19:28:50 2000
From: isaac at members.evolt.org (isaac)
Date: Wed Nov 22 19:28:50 2000
Subject: [thelist] digital camera shopping
In-Reply-To: <8C8B8745C0FE7A43BFA6CABAB321117223F7D8@gate.ti3.com>
Message-ID:
> I'm awanting a digital camera...
I'm going to jump onto the back of this thread, but I'm after something a
touch above Scott's request.
I've been reading the reviews at these sites:
http://www.dcresource.com/
http://www.steves-digicams.com/
but thought that some of you guys might have some tips on what to look out
for.
My budget is probably AUD$750-1000 (which at current dismal exchange rates
is around US$500).
I'm hoping to find something with good optical zoom and resolution. Also,
with a movie mode of some sort (preferably with audio, but I can live
without it.)
It'd be good to have something that takes Compact Flash Type II that
supports the IBM Microdrives - that'd be handy to have when travelling so I
wouldn't have to buy a notebook to go with it.
USB support would be good, but serial is bearable if I can get hold of a USB
card reader later on. An uncompressed (ie, TIFF, RAW) mode would be very,
very handy.
The favourite of the above two sites appears to be the Olympus D-490Z:
http://www.dcresource.com/reviews/olympus/d490z-review/index.html
It does silent movie mode, Uncompressed TIFFs, but has no USB, and comes
with a shitty storage card (8MB). It's about US$500.
Unfortunately, it doesn't appear to be available in Australia. A local
camera place recommended the more-expensive Olympus C-990, but I can't find
reviews of it at either of the sites I've linked to above.
Anyone outside the US got any experience with buying cameras from there? I
imagine that likely problems are warranties/guarantees, AC power adapters
having the wrong plug, etc.
tia,
isaac
From KarenB at FrontierSoftware.com.au Wed Nov 22 20:02:09 2000
From: KarenB at FrontierSoftware.com.au (Karen Bowen)
Date: Wed Nov 22 20:02:09 2000
Subject: [thelist] .htc & behaviours
Message-ID: <91543B2058D0D211A6B30090271C8E6BCE798E@neptune.internal.frontier>
Are .htc files and methods of attaching behaviours via style sheets, etc,
IE-specific? Does N6 support them?
e.g. behavior: url("");
TIA
Karen
From amanda at gawow.com Wed Nov 22 22:11:03 2000
From: amanda at gawow.com (A. Erickson)
Date: Wed Nov 22 22:11:03 2000
Subject: [thelist] digital camera shopping
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
I went and read about a billion reviews last year and compiled a list of the
things that seemed most recurring in terms of what to look for in a good
camera. Now I give this list to you. Granted, I didn't follow any of these
things as my hubby went out and bought me an older Kodak digital camera
which has pretty decent quality -- I'm more impressed than not with it's
results.
- LCD screen of 2" on the diagonal or more
- LCD which tracks in real time
- Optical finder so that you can use in bright sunlight
- zoom lens should be optical not digital
- automatic and manual controls offer more options; look for light-metering
capabilities
- check for flimsy parts
- there's a typical delay between shots on digital cameras so you could look
for a rapid-shooting mode or "burst" mode
- USB for better/faster transfer
- external card readers are good, too.
- check how many images at highest res the cameral will hold -- not memory
- rechargeable batteris
- check if uncompressed images (usually tiff) output is available for really
hi-res shots
- play with the buttons and the interface a lot before you buy -- some of
those buttons are too small/too close together and some of the interfaces
are clunky and hard to work with.
- amanda, now holding out for a digital camera that can do 15 sec. MPEGS
From jspencer at sunflower.com Wed Nov 22 22:42:36 2000
From: jspencer at sunflower.com (John Spencer)
Date: Wed Nov 22 22:42:36 2000
Subject: [thelist] digital camera shopping
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
-----Original Message-----
From: thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org
[mailto:thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org]On Behalf Of A. Erickson
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2000 10:16 PM
To: thelist at lists.evolt.org
Subject: RE: [thelist] digital camera shopping
>- amanda, now holding out for a digital camera that can do 15 sec. MPEGS<
The new Sony Mavica MVC CD-1000 can record 15 seconds, and it has a built in
cdr burner, dumping images directly to Mini CD. The minis will work on most
cd-roms unless they are several years old, in which case it comes with a
holder. It has image stabilization, and a lot more.
http://www.sel.sony.com/SEL/consumer/mavica/home.htm I am really hoping that
Santa will get together with my entire family and get this for me!!
Cheers and Happy T-day to those here in the states!
John
It doesn't really matter how new, bad or expensive the equipment is, if you
have no idea how to take a "good" photograph you are probably not going to
get a good result.
Investing in a book to learn the basics can really make a lot of difference.
But at the same time do not suppress your creative thoughts, always try it
even if it might not work. I know it's a lame tip, but it's my first, so
take pity on me.
---------------------------------------
For unsubscribe and other options, including
the Tip Harvester and archive of TheList go to:
http://lists.evolt.org Workers of the Web, evolt !
From desmoljones at hotmail.com Wed Nov 22 23:39:08 2000
From: desmoljones at hotmail.com (M. Hannan)
Date: Wed Nov 22 23:39:08 2000
Subject: [thelist] digital camera shopping
Message-ID:
>I hear many people refer to 'mega-pixel' as if it were the sole >measuring
>stick by which digital cameras ought be measured. Remember >that all of
>those pixels will only be as well 'exposed' as the >instrument that
>'exposes' them. Optics are of unparalleled importance.
I agree....BUT, all things being relatively equal (optics across the
medium-to-low range digital camera selections) you will notice bad
resolution quicker than you will notice bad optics...given the price range
and intended purposes stated. If we had an unlimited budget I'd be talking
about some nice digital backs for your medium format Hassie. Since we're
talking budget then the issue of first order is resolution.
m@
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com
From framar at interlog.com Thu Nov 23 00:03:22 2000
From: framar at interlog.com (Frank)
Date: Thu Nov 23 00:03:22 2000
Subject: [thelist] Who's more stupid?
Message-ID: <20001123010333-r01010600-64b3f808@24.43.66.191>
We deal with an ISP we're on fairly familiar terms with. Today, I got an email
from the admin asking a technical question about how I had set up some joins in
one of my product's database.
What?
When I asked to clarify whether he was building a product based on ours, to
resell to other customers, he essentially (and casually) said yes. (WTF was he
thinking?!)
Now, as he is our unique supplier of CF ISP services, and the admin, I've got
some serious, serious thinking to do about protecting our materials.
I know I can encrypt my code- can I decrypt it? And can I encrypt my database in
such a way that it functions, and yet still not allow him, with his Admin God
status to get the password?
I don't know who'se more stupid: Me for trusting in a business situation, or him
for outright telling me that he's screwing me over.
Frank Marion Loofah Communications
frank at loofahcom.com http://www.loofahcom.com
From jayfitz at bayou.com Thu Nov 23 00:11:58 2000
From: jayfitz at bayou.com (Jay Fitzgerald)
Date: Thu Nov 23 00:11:58 2000
Subject: [thelist] PostgreSQL
Message-ID: <3A1CB462.26FC724B@bayou.com>
Does anyone know of a fairly decent web admin interface/wrapper for
Postgres?
From mail at redhotsweeps.com Thu Nov 23 00:15:48 2000
From: mail at redhotsweeps.com (CDitty)
Date: Thu Nov 23 00:15:48 2000
Subject: [thelist] Who's more stupid?
In-Reply-To: <20001123010333-r01010600-64b3f808@24.43.66.191>
Message-ID: <4.2.2.20001123000635.00b02d00@redhotsweeps.com>
In Cold Fusion, you can encrypt, but cannot decrypt. Keep a backup
copy. As for the database, I do not think there is anything you can
do. All he really has to do is turn on the logging features of the
database and all your sql commands are saved to a log file.
Kinda sucks if you want to keep everything a secret. Only thing I can
suggest is to offer to lease it to them. (If you want to go that route).
Good luck.
At 12:03 AM 11/23/00 , you wrote:
>We deal with an ISP we're on fairly familiar terms with. Today, I got an email
>from the admin asking a technical question about how I had set up some
>joins in
>one of my product's database.
>
>What?
>
>When I asked to clarify whether he was building a product based on ours, to
>resell to other customers, he essentially (and casually) said yes. (WTF was he
>thinking?!)
>
>Now, as he is our unique supplier of CF ISP services, and the admin, I've got
>some serious, serious thinking to do about protecting our materials.
>
>I know I can encrypt my code- can I decrypt it? And can I encrypt my
>database in
>such a way that it functions, and yet still not allow him, with his Admin God
>status to get the password?
>
>I don't know who'se more stupid: Me for trusting in a business situation,
>or him
>for outright telling me that he's screwing me over.
>
>
>Frank Marion Loofah Communications
>frank at loofahcom.com http://www.loofahcom.com
>
>---------------------------------------
>For unsubscribe and other options, including
>the Tip Harvester and archive of TheList go to:
>http://lists.evolt.org Workers of the Web, evolt !
From isaac at members.evolt.org Thu Nov 23 00:39:03 2000
From: isaac at members.evolt.org (isaac)
Date: Thu Nov 23 00:39:03 2000
Subject: [thelist] Who's more stupid?
In-Reply-To: <4.2.2.20001123000635.00b02d00@redhotsweeps.com>
Message-ID:
> In Cold Fusion, you can encrypt, but cannot decrypt.
I believe there are methods (fairly easily found on the Web) of decrypting
encrypted CF files. I would not rely on it for stuff you definitely want to
keep to yourself.
Surely what the ISP is doing is not permissable? Maybe you should talk to a
lawyer about it (or at least check through the contract you signed with the
ISP)? A slightly threatening letter could get them to stop stealing your
stuff, or license it (if you were happy to go down that path) from you for a
fee.
BTW, they're more stupid, and they sound like bastards. :P
i
From rob at bigbang.net.au Thu Nov 23 01:22:52 2000
From: rob at bigbang.net.au (Rob Keniger)
Date: Thu Nov 23 01:22:52 2000
Subject: [thelist] Who's more stupid?
In-Reply-To: <20001123010333-r01010600-64b3f808@24.43.66.191>
Message-ID:
on 11/23/00 4:03 PM, Frank at framar at interlog.com wrote:
> We deal with an ISP we're on fairly familiar terms with. Today, I got an email
> from the admin asking a technical question about how I had set up some joins
> in
> one of my product's database.
>
> What?
That's my reaction. I can't believe this.
> When I asked to clarify whether he was building a product based on ours, to
> resell to other customers, he essentially (and casually) said yes. (WTF was he
> thinking?!)
This is completely, totally and utterly illegal. Talk to a good IP lawyer
immediately.
> Now, as he is our unique supplier of CF ISP services, and the admin, I've got
> some serious, serious thinking to do about protecting our materials.
>
> I know I can encrypt my code- can I decrypt it? And can I encrypt my database
> in
> such a way that it functions, and yet still not allow him, with his Admin God
> status to get the password?
>
> I don't know who'se more stupid: Me for trusting in a business situation, or
> him
> for outright telling me that he's screwing me over.
It doesn't matter. Unless you signed a contract to the contrary then you
have an iron-clad case against them. What they have done is illegal and
immoral. Don't even bother trying to encrypt your code. Speak to a lawyer.
--
Rob Keniger
big bang solutions
From Douglas.Potts at dla.com Thu Nov 23 03:02:56 2000
From: Douglas.Potts at dla.com (Potts, Douglas)
Date: Thu Nov 23 03:02:56 2000
Subject: [thelist] Python
Message-ID: <3D6CEDD758B0D2119C860008C75D167E0318BB90@exbdf.dibbluptonalsop.co.uk>
Hi,
Just wondered if anyone is using this and if so what it's good for. I have
no knowledge of this at all and just wondered. I heard google was written
with this. Does anyone know?
Regards,
Doug
If you don't know java yet, have a look at it. I'm using it at the
moment and it's an excellent! language, and there's some excellent open
source stuff appearing try www.freshmeat.net for starters.
==============================================================================
The contents of this email are confidential to the intended recipient at the email address to which it has been addressed. It may not be disclosed to or used by anyone other than this addressee, nor may it be copied in any way. If received in error, please contact DLA, a UK law firm, (http://www.dla.com/) on +44 (0) 8700 111111 quoting the name of the sender and the addressee and then delete it from your system.
Please note that neither DLA nor the sender accepts any responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan the email and attachments (if any). No contracts may be concluded on behalf of DLA by means of email communications.
A list of the names of the partners of DLA (who are either solicitors or registered foreign lawyers) and their qualifications is available for inspection at 3 Noble Street, London, EC2V 7EE, UK.
Regulated by the Law Society of England and Wales; authorised by the Society to conduct investment business.
==============================================================================
From zoe.oughton at btconnect.com Thu Nov 23 03:29:31 2000
From: zoe.oughton at btconnect.com (Zoe Oughton)
Date: Thu Nov 23 03:29:31 2000
Subject: [thelist] Browser detection and style sheets
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID: <2234F.FDB%zoe.oughton@btconnect.com>
Hi listees
I will ask this again, but try and explain a little better :o)
I currently use different style sheets for windows IE, windows NN, Mac IE
and Mac NN.
This tends to work well, but I now wish to add another 1 or 2 style sheets,
namely one for Mac IE 5 and up, and another for Mac NN 6 and up.
I use JavaScript for browser/platform detection, the script sits in an
external js file, the script I use is:
I have tried to modify the code to add choices for the extra style sheets,
but I am no coder!!!! and have been unable to do this successfully (I nearly
got it a couple of times - but didn't work properly!!!!).
I have also searched the internet (thanks for suggestions I have already
had), but the scripts I have found (and been given) have only tended to deal
with different browsers (all on PC) I have not been able to find anything
that will deal with browsers and platforms.
I know I am thick when it comes to programming :o( but I do try. Are there
any script gurus out there who would be willing to help me with the extra
code needed to add options for extra style sheets???
I also know that browser detection can be done server side, and that this
might be a better solution. I would be quite happy to do this, but again I
am struggling to find a suitable cgi script, I have spent hours looking but
again can only find browser detection, or when I do find something that will
detect both browser and platform it is not shown how to use the script for
what I want.
Am I the only one who wants different style sheets depending on platform as
well as browser????
Zoe
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Zoe Oughton
zoe.oughton at btconnect.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From richard.morris at web-designers.co.uk Thu Nov 23 06:16:25 2000
From: richard.morris at web-designers.co.uk (Richard H. Morris)
Date: Thu Nov 23 06:16:25 2000
Subject: [thelist] UK: Disability Discrimination and Web Site Design (was Dropdowns - good or bad?)
Message-ID:
>>> 1995 Disability Discrimination Act: http://www.disability.gov.uk/
See also http://www.hmso.gov.uk/acts/acts1995/1995050.htm
>>I'm aware of the physical access provisions to premises and physical sites
>>and have been involved in the consultation process (to a limited extent
>>through business law committees) on the roll-out provisions in relation to
>>offices and premises and the like with the consequent alterations to
>>building envelopes.
>>I can't see how that translates into a legal requirement for disabled
access
>>to a web site though.
> There's no exemption for web sites. All the legislation mentions is
'services
>to the public', with a few examples (banking, supermarkets etc), noting
that
>the list is not exclusive.
>The legal advice I had in the summer was that it absolutely covered web
>sites (it was a "Holy shit!" moment for the lawyer in question - I brought
it
>to her attention)
My initial thought is that this applies to physical goods, services and
premises. But as it is of great importance to any UK-based designers on the
list and those with UK-based Clients, I reckon this deserves further
research. If it does apply to web sites and the small business exemptions
does not, then we as designers should be pointing this out to our Clients
and producing either compliant sites first off or perhaps producing a
version which is compliant (with well-flagged hyperlinks to it from the
opening page).
I have contacted the DDA Helpline and they have promised to come back to me
with some guidance as to whether web sites are included.
The Act itself is not helpful from my first blush reading of it, but the
Code of Practice seems interesting: I need to read it some more.
The Code is available at http://www.disability.gov.uk/dda/finalcode.pdf for
those interested/affected.
I'll report back.
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/
Richard H. Morris, Director, Web Designers Ltd
http://www.web-designers.co.uk
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Registered in England No 3506389
Registered Office:
3 Church Street Wymondham Norfolk NR18 0PH
Trading Address:
4 Maden Close Wymondham Norfolk NR18 0UA
T: +44 (0)1953 606158
F: +44 (0)1953 606185
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/
From richard.morris at web-designers.co.uk Thu Nov 23 07:05:53 2000
From: richard.morris at web-designers.co.uk (Richard H. Morris)
Date: Thu Nov 23 07:05:53 2000
Subject: [thelist] a blonde table question
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
Shoshannah Forbes asked:
> -----Original Message-----
> >I need it to cling to the bottom. It works fine with 800X600, but at
> >1024X768 I have a gap at the bottom of the window. How do I get
> rid of it?
Try doing something like this:
Title
adding your colours and content, etc. where appropriate.
This seems to work on various flavours of browser and platform.
HTH
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/
Richard. H. Morris, Web Designers Limited
~~ http://www.web-designers.co.uk ~~
"I'd rather have a full bottle in front of me
than a full frontal lobotomy"
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/
From roselli at earthlink.net Thu Nov 23 07:21:33 2000
From: roselli at earthlink.net (aardvark)
Date: Thu Nov 23 07:21:33 2000
Subject: [thelist] Browser detection and style sheets
In-Reply-To: <2234F.FDB%zoe.oughton@btconnect.com>
References:
Message-ID: <3A1CD345.1620.404D0F34@localhost>
> From: Zoe Oughton
>
> Am I the only one who wants different style sheets depending on platform as
> well as browser????
no...
but a long time ago i gave up on that... ultimately, i still generally
use CSS only for text control, so the only thing that's different from
browser/platform to browser/platform is the interpretation of units...
i've done pretty well (i think) building CSS files that are legible to all
(algonquinstudios.com) or allowing users to resize the text on their
own (roselli.org)...
i know it doesn't help your specific question, but by bypassing the
need, you could alleviate the problem...
From roselli at earthlink.net Thu Nov 23 07:27:46 2000
From: roselli at earthlink.net (aardvark)
Date: Thu Nov 23 07:27:46 2000
Subject: [thelist] Who's more stupid?
In-Reply-To:
References: <20001123010333-r01010600-64b3f808@24.43.66.191>
Message-ID: <3A1CD4D6.24020.40532E6E@localhost>
> From: Rob Keniger
>
> > When I asked to clarify whether he was building a product based on ours, to
> > resell to other customers, he essentially (and casually) said yes. (WTF was he
> > thinking?!)
>
> This is completely, totally and utterly illegal. Talk to a good IP lawyer
> immediately.
he's right... gather information (log your phone conversation, send
him an email and get him to confirm what he's doing, cite your
source code) and get it ready...
give him a call telling him that you have not given him permission
to reverse-engineer your code and resell it... tell him he has to
stop immediately... have your lawyer send a letter (this part
should be relatively cheap)...
if you let this go, do not act immediately, or imply in any way that
this might be ok, you can be screwed... you need to be swift and
decisive, and leave no room for misinterpretation...
From zoe.oughton at btconnect.com Thu Nov 23 07:46:24 2000
From: zoe.oughton at btconnect.com (Zoe Oughton)
Date: Thu Nov 23 07:46:24 2000
Subject: [thelist] UK: Disability Discrimination and Web Site Design
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID: <25F8D.FE7%zoe.oughton@btconnect.com>
>
> I have contacted the DDA Helpline and they have promised to come back to me
> with some guidance as to whether web sites are included.
>
> The Act itself is not helpful from my first blush reading of it, but the
> Code of Practice seems interesting: I need to read it some more.
>
> The Code is available at http://www.disability.gov.uk/dda/finalcode.pdf for
> those interested/affected.
>
> I'll report back.
I also think this is an issue which we need to address. I have recently
started to redesign a government department (or sorta governemnt we are at
'arms lenth' - whatever that means :o) ) web site, and I am keen for it to
be fully accessible but visually appealing.
My first design did not specify a font size, I wanted let the user define
their own font size or have their default browser font size. This was so
that those who needed/required/wanted large font sizes were able to increase
the size with no problems.
However, my boss does not like the default PC font size on most browsers, he
thinks it is too big and insists that I make it smaller. My reaction was to
explain about accessibility, but he was insistant saying that if needed we
can add pages to the site later for those who wanted more control
themselves!!!! >:o(
I have spent lots of time looking at what is the best way to control font
sizes, but still giving users some control. NOT easy!!!
I have read that many articles about:
'Only use pt for font size'
'never use pt for font size'
'only use em for font size'
'never use em for font size'
'only use % for font size'
'never use % for font size'
My head is realing with all the contradictory advice regarding font size and
accessibility, and I am still non the wiser!:o(
I think I might use % as it seems to be the one element that still gives
users some control themselves. But if anyone has any better advice I am all
ears!!
I think it is important that these issues are dealt with as soon as possible
because it could eventually affect all of us. I have downloaded the
Disability Discrimination Act, Code of Conduct and will read it as soon as I
get a chance. Like Richard I will report on anything I find out.
Zoe
From peter at vardus.com Thu Nov 23 07:57:13 2000
From: peter at vardus.com (Peter Van Dijck)
Date: Thu Nov 23 07:57:13 2000
Subject: [thelist] SE spidering spectra URL's
In-Reply-To: <3A1BF8C6.29045.3CFE894D@localhost>
References:
Message-ID: <4.3.2.20001123135434.02511760@smtp.vardus.net>
Am I correct to think that SE's don't spider URL's with querystrings? And
if so, in many sites, if we want them to be spidered we need to give it
url's without querystrings? (like wired.com)
The approach we're taking is this:
we are building a Spectra site with lots of daily articles, e.g. there will
be URL's.
However, we make a daily copy of these articles into normal url's.
Then, we will submit a page with links to these url's to the se's.
That shold work.
Am I missing a better way, or anything???
Thanks guys!!
Peter (sick and speccing)
From gsd at mac.com Thu Nov 23 07:57:54 2000
From: gsd at mac.com (George Donnelly)
Date: Thu Nov 23 07:57:54 2000
Subject: [thelist] Python
In-Reply-To: <3D6CEDD758B0D2119C860008C75D167E0318BB90@exbdf.dibbluptonalsop.co.uk>
Message-ID:
One thing its good for is Zope, a powerful object-oriented (like Python)
content management system. Zope is written mainly in python with a little C.
its open-source and free.
http://www.zope.org/
I'm a python newbie but I know of its many good points is that it is easy to
learn and easy to read.
kind regards,
george
http://www.cyklotron.com/
We must be the change we wish to see. --MK Gandhi
> Just wondered if anyone is using this and if so what it's good for. I have
> no knowledge of this at all and just wondered. I heard google was written
> with this. Does anyone know?
From gsd at mac.com Thu Nov 23 08:00:02 2000
From: gsd at mac.com (George Donnelly)
Date: Thu Nov 23 08:00:02 2000
Subject: [thelist] SE spidering spectra URL's
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.20001123135434.02511760@smtp.vardus.net>
Message-ID:
I know that Google recently indexed some pages on my site that had a "?" in
the URL.
kind regards,
george
http://www.cyklotron.com/
We must be the change we wish to see. --MK Gandhi
> Am I correct to think that SE's don't spider URL's with querystrings? And
> if so, in many sites, if we want them to be spidered we need to give it
> url's without querystrings? (like wired.com)
> The approach we're taking is this:
> we are building a Spectra site with lots of daily articles, e.g. there will
> be URL's.
> However, we make a daily copy of these articles into normal url's.
> Then, we will submit a page with links to these url's to the se's.
> That shold work.
> Am I missing a better way, or anything???
From r937 at interlog.com Thu Nov 23 08:12:30 2000
From: r937 at interlog.com (rudy)
Date: Thu Nov 23 08:12:30 2000
Subject: [thelist] UK: Disability Discrimination and Web Site Design
Message-ID: <01c05557$58b449e0$c54e149a@default>
>My first design did not specify a font size, I wanted let the user define
>their own font size or have their default browser font size. This was so
>that those who needed/required/wanted large font sizes were able to
increase
>the size with no problems.
hi zoe
this font size strategy is not good enough for some people, but personally
i think it is the greatest and has several advantages
- less code
- browser detection eliminated
- resizes well on all platforms
- prints with no problems
- simplifies style sheets
- et cetera, et cetera
the only disadvantage? it looks too roomy for portal fanatics who want to
squeeze as much as possible above the fold
>However, my boss does not like the default PC font size on most browsers,
he
>thinks it is too big and insists that I make it smaller. My reaction was
to
>explain about accessibility, but he was insistant saying that if needed we
>can add pages to the site later for those who wanted more control
>themselves!!!! >:o(
i know it's not nice to judge someone on the basis of one comment, but he
sounds like a real clueless pointy-haired type
instead of browser detection, i think maybe it's time for you to do some
new job detection
otherwise you're going to feel a lot of stress in future
it's like you spend hours on a fine sauce for your meal, and he's putting
ketchup all over it
bleargh
rudy
r937.com
From r937 at interlog.com Thu Nov 23 08:23:17 2000
From: r937 at interlog.com (rudy)
Date: Thu Nov 23 08:23:17 2000
Subject: [thelist] a blonde table question
Message-ID: <01c05559$007fce00$c54e149a@default>
>Try doing something like this:
>[snip]
>
>[snip]
>This seems to work on various flavours of browser and platform.
hi richard
um, that'll work fine on various flavours of *windows* platform
i'd go with an iso charset
sorry to jump on this little detail, i know your post was on a different
topic, but i can't help myself sometimes...
rudy
r937.com
From andy.war at ntlworld.com Thu Nov 23 08:23:49 2000
From: andy.war at ntlworld.com (Andy Warwick)
Date: Thu Nov 23 08:23:49 2000
Subject: [thelist] UK: Disability Discrimination and Web Site Design
In-Reply-To: <25F8D.FE7%zoe.oughton@btconnect.com>
Message-ID:
on 2/1/04 7:12 pm, Zoe Oughton at zoe.oughton at btconnect.com wrote:
> I have recently
> started to redesign a government department (or sorta governemnt we are at
> 'arms lenth' - whatever that means :o) ) web site, and I am keen for it to
> be fully accessible but visually appealing.
A noble goal; good luck - you'll need it.
I have spent many hours trying to achieve the same.
The site I am currently working on even looks fairly reasonable in lynx on
linux, so it /is/ possible.
> My first design did not specify a font size, I wanted let the user define
> their own font size or have their default browser font size. This was so
> that those who needed/required/wanted large font sizes were able to increase
> the size with no problems.
An important UI issue and one that I applaud. I detest sites that fix size
with pixels, or assume PC browsers, for general text and navigation (I make
exceptions for legal small print, etc.)
> However, my boss does not like the default PC font size on most browsers, he
> thinks it is too big and insists that I make it smaller. My reaction was to
> explain about accessibility, but he was insistant saying that if needed we
> can add pages to the site later for those who wanted more control
> themselves!!!! >:o(
At the risk of being flippant, is there any way to hack his PC (and any he
looks at) so that /his/ default size is acceptable, and let it slide as is?
> I have spent lots of time looking at what is the best way to control font
> sizes, but still giving users some control. NOT easy!!!
:)
> I have read that many articles about:
>
> 'Only use pt for font size'
> 'never use pt for font size'
> 'only use em for font size'
> 'never use em for font size'
> 'only use % for font size'
> 'never use % for font size'
>
> My head is realing with all the contradictory advice regarding font size and
> accessibility, and I am still non the wiser!:o(
Personally I use ems, with a server-side browser detect to serve different
CSS files depending on browser and platform. I'll tend to use a default em
setting on the Mac side that I like the look/feel off, (eg. 0.9 em), then
set up an identical style sheet for the PC with the point size approx. 20%
smaller (eg. 0.75 em). That usually accounts for the size difference across
platforms. Each style/size I set is an absolute em value, so that is is
always in pro. to the browser's local settings, and stays in pro. to other
text on the page.
As I understand it, a value of 1 em on a browser set to 16pt size will give
16pt, while the same text with a 0.5 em value will give an 8pt size. On a
browser with 12pt text, the same settings will give 12pt and 6pt. If that
isn't strictly correct, that at least seems to be the case.
I have heard that ems on particular versions of Netscape screw up printing,
but as I believe it is better to offer a "print version" of each page as
plain, unstyled text, that is not an issue.
> I think I might use % as it seems to be the one element that still gives
> users some control themselves. But if anyone has any better advice I am all
> ears!!
If you need more details/examples of some of the things I've figured out for
better accessability let me know.
> I think it is important that these issues are dealt with as soon as possible
> because it could eventually affect all of us. I have downloaded the
> Disability Discrimination Act, Code of Conduct and will read it as soon as I
> get a chance. Like Richard I will report on anything I find out.
I too have grabbed a copy and am studying it. Immediate questions arise
about the section on manufacturers of goods do not need to worry as the
store selling them is liable; do we - as 3rd party web designers - count as
'manufacturing' goods, that the client then offers as a service?
Andy W
From mike.king at redroom.co.uk Thu Nov 23 08:24:08 2000
From: mike.king at redroom.co.uk (Mike King)
Date: Thu Nov 23 08:24:08 2000
Subject: [thelist] UK: Disability Discrimination and Web Site Design
In-Reply-To: <25F8D.FE7%zoe.oughton@btconnect.com>
References:
Message-ID: <5.0.2.1.0.20001123141344.00a986a0@pop.redroom.co.uk>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Zoe,
If it's a government site, you will want to look into IAG (Information Age
Government)
http://www.iagchampions.gov.uk/iagc/guidelines/websites/websites.htm
I've just been through the whole shebang with http://www.qca.org.uk/ (just
went live last night.)
Also speak to the RNIB, they're VERY helpful.
Cheers
mk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.3 for non-commercial use
iQA/AwUBOh0ocPoJZSzUdy33EQI+7wCg1KFVtOmfx7uHQNeXqGCsO64lYSEAoMFd
zo6E+BMZ9RbebKeOZ5DsurjV
=HZh8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From zoe.oughton at btconnect.com Thu Nov 23 09:08:50 2000
From: zoe.oughton at btconnect.com (Zoe Oughton)
Date: Thu Nov 23 09:08:50 2000
Subject: [thelist] UK: Disability Discrimination and Web Site Design
In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.0.20001123141344.00a986a0@pop.redroom.co.uk>
Message-ID: <27216.FFC%zoe.oughton@btconnect.com>
> Zoe,
>
> If it's a government site, you will want to look into IAG (Information Age
> Government)
> http://www.iagchampions.gov.uk/iagc/guidelines/websites/websites.htm
>
> I've just been through the whole shebang with http://www.qca.org.uk/ (just
> went live last night.)
> Also speak to the RNIB, they're VERY helpful.
I've just looked at the QCA site - lovely on my Mac in IE 5, and I can see
everything on Mac IE 4.5 (although the tables do seem a bit messed up), but
I cannot change the size of the font. If I had poor vision and needed large
text I would be angry at not being able to enlarge it to my requirements!!
On Mac NN 4.7 with default settings I cannot read any of the text it is far
too small. I can however adjust the text size by going into the prefs, but
even so there is some text that will not enlarge and remains impossible to
read. NN6 Mac seems to render the text reasonably, but things are a little
weird!! the rollovers work, but are very slow, and the scroll is funny!!!!
strange,,,, but may very likely be the fault NN6.
I haven't looked at any of it on a PC, but I take it that you have already
checked everything on a PC.
I am not critiquing your site, just hilighting a few of the very problems
that I am trying to address.
This is a nightmare of a situation really, we designers want some control
over the way our sites work/look, but we also need to provide some user
control yet without forcing them to make changes they shouldn't have to!!
Ohhhh, what to do..... what to do...!! :-(
I have looked at the RNIB site.
Zoe
From richard.morris at web-designers.co.uk Thu Nov 23 09:15:12 2000
From: richard.morris at web-designers.co.uk (Richard H. Morris)
Date: Thu Nov 23 09:15:12 2000
Subject: [thelist] a blonde table question
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
I wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> Try doing something like this:
> Bottom
Poor choice of height value: this is *not* a percentage value.
Sorry for any confusion.
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/
Richard. H. Morris, Web Designers Limited
~~ http://www.web-designers.co.uk ~~
"I'd rather have a full bottle in front of me
than a full frontal lobotomy"
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/
From zoe.oughton at btconnect.com Thu Nov 23 09:18:36 2000
From: zoe.oughton at btconnect.com (Zoe Oughton)
Date: Thu Nov 23 09:18:36 2000
Subject: [thelist] UK: Disability Discrimination and Web Site Design
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID: <27516.FFD%zoe.oughton@btconnect.com>
>> However, my boss does not like the default PC font size on most browsers, he
>> thinks it is too big and insists that I make it smaller. My reaction was to
>> explain about accessibility, but he was insistant saying that if needed we
>> can add pages to the site later for those who wanted more control
>> themselves!!!! >:o(
>
> At the risk of being flippant, is there any way to hack his PC (and any he
> looks at) so that /his/ default size is acceptable, and let it slide as is?
Er, no, he knows his computer stuff!!!!!
>
>> I have spent lots of time looking at what is the best way to control font
>> sizes, but still giving users some control. NOT easy!!!
>
> :)
>
>> I have read that many articles about:
>>
>> 'Only use pt for font size'
>> 'never use pt for font size'
>> 'only use em for font size'
>> 'never use em for font size'
>> 'only use % for font size'
>> 'never use % for font size'
>>
>> My head is realing with all the contradictory advice regarding font size and
>> accessibility, and I am still non the wiser!:o(
>
> Personally I use ems, with a server-side browser detect to serve different
> CSS files depending on browser and platform. I'll tend to use a default em
> setting on the Mac side that I like the look/feel off, (eg. 0.9 em), then
> set up an identical style sheet for the PC with the point size approx. 20%
> smaller (eg. 0.75 em). That usually accounts for the size difference across
> platforms. Each style/size I set is an absolute em value, so that is is
> always in pro. to the browser's local settings, and stays in pro. to other
> text on the page.
I have a JavaScript browser detect to serve CSS files. I would like to use a
server-side cgi script, but I am not a script writer and have been unable to
find a suitable script anywhere - I have searched long and hard!!!!
However my JavaScript only provides for 4 different style sheets: PC IE, PC
NN, Mac IE and Mac NN. I now feel that I should add Mac IE5 and up, and Mac
NN6 and up as these new Mac browsers tend to render fonts differently from
previous browsers on the Mac. So I have the problem of finding a suitable
script.
I have considered using em, but again I have read that it is not good
practice to use em!!!
>
> As I understand it, a value of 1 em on a browser set to 16pt size will give
> 16pt, while the same text with a 0.5 em value will give an 8pt size. On a
> browser with 12pt text, the same settings will give 12pt and 6pt. If that
> isn't strictly correct, that at least seems to be the case.
>
> I have heard that ems on particular versions of Netscape screw up printing,
> but as I believe it is better to offer a "print version" of each page as
> plain, unstyled text, that is not an issue.
>
>> I think I might use % as it seems to be the one element that still gives
>> users some control themselves. But if anyone has any better advice I am all
>> ears!!
>
> If you need more details/examples of some of the things I've figured out for
> better accessability let me know.
I am always keen to know of anything for better accessibility as I am sure
it will definatelly become a major issue in the future.
Thanks Andy, for the input.
I am still not sure if I am any the wiser though :o)
>
>> I think it is important that these issues are dealt with as soon as possible
>> because it could eventually affect all of us. I have downloaded the
>> Disability Discrimination Act, Code of Conduct and will read it as soon as I
>> get a chance. Like Richard I will report on anything I find out.
>
> I too have grabbed a copy and am studying it. Immediate questions arise
> about the section on manufacturers of goods do not need to worry as the
> store selling them is liable; do we - as 3rd party web designers - count as
> 'manufacturing' goods, that the client then offers as a service?
To be seen, to be seen........
Zoe
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Zoe Oughton
zoe.oughton at btconnect.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From richard.morris at web-designers.co.uk Thu Nov 23 10:21:07 2000
From: richard.morris at web-designers.co.uk (Richard H. Morris)
Date: Thu Nov 23 10:21:07 2000
Subject: [thelist] UK: Disability Discrimination and Web Site Design (was Dropdowns - good or bad?)
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
I wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> I have contacted the DDA Helpline and they have promised to come
> back to me
> with some guidance as to whether web sites are included.
They rang back.
At first they said that web sites weren't covered by the legislation. We
spoke some more. They checked again and then said that the sites could fall
into the 'services' category...
So, it appears that they don't know the answer themselves!
I asked them to confirm their advice so that I could dangle something in
front of the Clients. They suggested the Code of Practice...
Is it any wonder we're all in disarray?
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/
Richard. H. Morris, Web Designers Limited
~~ http://www.web-designers.co.uk ~~
"I'd rather have a full bottle in front of me
than a full frontal lobotomy"
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/
From richard.morris at web-designers.co.uk Thu Nov 23 10:21:10 2000
From: richard.morris at web-designers.co.uk (Richard H. Morris)
Date: Thu Nov 23 10:21:10 2000
Subject: [thelist] a blonde table question
In-Reply-To: <01c05559$007fce00$c54e149a@default>
Message-ID:
rudy noted:
> -----Original Message-----
> >Try doing something like this:
> >[snip]
> >
> >[snip]
> >This seems to work on various flavours of browser and platform.
>
>
> hi richard
>
> um, that'll work fine on various flavours of *windows* platform
>
> i'd go with an iso charset
>
>
>
> sorry to jump on this little detail, i know your post was on a different
> topic, but i can't help myself sometimes...
Oops! Well spotted!
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/
Richard. H. Morris, Web Designers Limited
~~ http://www.web-designers.co.uk ~~
"I'd rather have a full bottle in front of me
than a full frontal lobotomy"
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/
From david.braun at centralnet.ch Thu Nov 23 11:24:25 2000
From: david.braun at centralnet.ch (david braun)
Date: Thu Nov 23 11:24:25 2000
Subject: [thelist] a blonde table question
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID: <20001123182439-r01010600-7793f726@193.246.199.133>
on the other hand, consider syntax: height-percentage is not allowed...
some browsers may not like such. (but I haven't seen any as of yet...)
david
Richard H. Morris schrieb am 23.11.2000:
> I wrote:
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > Try doing something like this:
> > Bottom
>
> Poor choice of height value: this is *not* a percentage value.
>
> Sorry for any confusion.
>
> _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/
> Richard. H. Morris, Web Designers Limited
> ~~ http://www.web-designers.co.uk ~~
> "I'd rather have a full bottle in front of me
> than a full frontal lobotomy"
> _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------
> For unsubscribe and other options, including
> the Tip Harvester and archive of TheList go to:
> http://lists.evolt.org Workers of the Web, evolt !
From mcollins206 at home.com Thu Nov 23 11:27:36 2000
From: mcollins206 at home.com (Michael Collins)
Date: Thu Nov 23 11:27:36 2000
Subject: [thelist] jfax vs. efax
In-Reply-To: