I think it's a subcontious marketing ploy on their part: "We know there will be mistakes (see, we have tons) so don't bother trying to perfect it yet, since even we know how difficult it is with all of the browsers out there ..." -----Original Message----- From: thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org [mailto:thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org]On Behalf Of Frank Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 9:32 AM To: thelist at lists.evolt.org Subject: [thelist] CSS & W3C: Hmmm... Went to validate one of my stylesheets, and got a few mild errors. Oh! I thought I had it right. Geez. Now I need to relearn the whole bloody thing again. I decided to look at the stylesheet for the W3C's validator http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/style/general.css Checkout the results for yourself. (Watch the wrap!) http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator-uri.html Hmmmm... They got more errors that I did. Now why should I validate to W3C standards when they don't seem to? -- Frank Marion Loofah Communications frank at loofahcom.com http://www.loofahcom.com --------------------------------------- For unsubscribe and other options, including the Tip Harvester and archive of TheList go to: http://lists.evolt.org Workers of the Web, evolt !