[thelist] quote from Webmonkey site re: copyrighted images
Martin Kuplens-Ewart
martin at takingitglobal.org
Tue Aug 28 15:53:46 CDT 2001
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> But, if I take an image (either from the web, or scanned from a
> book, or from a CD or wherever), pixelate the heck out of > it, and
> run it through a negative emboss, the resulting image should be
> beyond recognition, and yet serve whatever warped > artistic
> purpose I had. Is this still considered derivative and
> copywritten?
If the original artist was smart, they will have embedded a digimarc
watermark that would most likely have survived even all that. So the
artwork would still be technically "recognisable" ;)
- -martin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA+AwUBO4wEY/BkKbnuftUkEQI1aQCgk+Oo81Ubedcpg7jpBCZu1tnr0aIAl2lV
ACy+iKlMS0OgpXE4MwnQeh4=
=ykgn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the thelist
mailing list