[thelist] ASP/open source/static/dymanic sites pro's and con's
Tony Crockford
tonyc at boldfish.co.uk
Mon Jan 14 15:30:50 CST 2002
>>2. Dynamic versus static sites
>
>DYNAMIC! DYNAMIC! DYNAMIC! DYNAMIC! DYNAMIC!
Thanks, but is this simply because using templates and a database is easier
maintenance?
If I use templates and a database to produce a static site is this a better
or worse solution?
Given that the data isn't time sensitive ( no-one is updating it minute by
minute) isn't it better to have all the pages there on the server?
I think I'm hearing you right, but I'm looking for a compelling reason to
implement IIS and ASP when I'm starting from scratch.
Anyone?
Thanks
Tony
More information about the thelist
mailing list