[thelist] Bold vs. Strong
rudy
rudy937 at rogers.com
Wed Aug 20 06:37:06 CDT 2003
>> i disagree, a bold style does not <i>necessarily</i> mean emphasis,
>> although i will concede that it may to many people
>
> Then how could you define it?
use B for bold, and use EM and STRONG for two levels of emphasis
yes, my previous post was largely sarcastic
> ... what's (again) the use of bold text with no meaning implied to the
boldism?
meaning? does there have to be meaning? it's just bold
> How do you define a text that is "going to be bold only visually but not
mean
> that this part of text is meant to effectively be put forward in my
discourse"?
how to define text that is only bold visually but has no emphasis?
B
rudy
More information about the thelist
mailing list