From harvester at lists.evolt.org Mon Apr 3 00:00:23 2006
From: harvester at lists.evolt.org (harvester at lists.evolt.org)
Date: 3 Apr 2006 00:00:23 -0500
Subject: [thelist] Tip Harvest for the Week of Monday Mar 27, 2006
Message-ID: <20060403050023.26309.qmail@tempest.evolt.org>
The tip harvest for the Week of Monday Mar 27, 2006 has been added
to the lists.evolt.org site. Get it at:
http://lists.evolt.org/harvest/show.cgi?w=20060327
Week at a glance listing at:
http://lists.evolt.org/harvest/week.cgi?w=20060327
Harvest Summary
---------------
Number of messages: 206
Number of tips : 4
Tip Authors
-----------
bird (1)
Christian Heilmann (1)
John Brooking (1)
kasimir-k (1)
Tip Types
---------
example domain names (1)
Isolating code bugs (1)
JavaScript (1)
photoshop (1)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What: Tips are how a list subscriber "pays" for making an off-topic post
to the list (see List Info for more information). Of course, this
does not make off-topic posts acceptable. :)
How : You include a tip in your posting by using the [tip]...[/tip] tag
(replace the square brackets with angle brackets). The tip tag takes
the optional attributes of 'type' and 'author'.
From lee.kowalkowski at googlemail.com Mon Apr 3 03:07:10 2006
From: lee.kowalkowski at googlemail.com (Lee kowalkowski)
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 09:07:10 +0100
Subject: [thelist] hidden span breaks form value?
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID: <610592c90604030107y55b9fbe8y5468d8a86631f405@mail.gmail.com>
On 01/04/06, Canfield, Joel wrote:
>
> value="Data_Entry_Error" onclick="toggleVis('deerror',this);" />
Well, what does the toggleVis function do exactly? On the other radio
buttons, you're passing it a string, but this time, your passing it the
whole input element.
-- LK
From codepo8 at gmail.com Mon Apr 3 04:37:17 2006
From: codepo8 at gmail.com (Christian Heilmann)
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 10:37:17 +0100
Subject: [thelist] Script for M$IE only, or not
In-Reply-To:
References: <442EF509.9060205@ij.net>
<200604020022.55554.richard.bennett@skynet.be>
<442F941E.6000403@zstudio.co.uk>
Message-ID: <30bd6ffd0604030237q4d37bb1dkc3b314b14091f4d8@mail.gmail.com>
> > if (document.all) {
>
> Rumor has it that new versions of Firefox support document.all syntax.
> Though I'm not sure.
> Anyway, why should you write vendor-specific css since most of the modern
> browsers display almost identical if you treat them good enough.
document.all is supported by Mozilla but only in part:
http://weblogs.asp.net/jgalloway/archive/2005/08/07/421798.aspx
http://mozillanews.org/?article_date=2004-07-23+18-06-59 (aahhhrghh
animated favicon!!!)
The only bullet proof way seems to be conditional comments:
and then check for isIE
if(isIE){alert('CSS transition filters, coloured scrollbars, tigers,
elephants, yay!');}
Dirty mixing of structure and behaviour though. The other suggestion
of picking one of the more obscure MSIE only objects makes more sense,
but then again browser sniffing doesn't make much sense anyways.
HTH
Chris
--
Chris Heilmann
Blog: http://www.wait-till-i.com
Writing: http://icant.co.uk/
Binaries: http://www.onlinetools.org/
From richard.bennett at skynet.be Mon Apr 3 04:38:19 2006
From: richard.bennett at skynet.be (Richard Bennett)
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 11:38:19 +0200
Subject: [thelist] client to post video
In-Reply-To: <005b01c656ae$2f37c480$2002a8c0@2GHZDADSXP>
References: <029c01c653fe$83f5cb00$6400a8c0@nnepacorp.com>
<98C4FC06-76D9-49E3-8B3A-8B7AB235D0E2@loudjoy.com>
<005b01c656ae$2f37c480$2002a8c0@2GHZDADSXP>
Message-ID: <200604031138.19921.richard.bennett@skynet.be>
On Monday 03 April 2006 01:35, Daryl Brown wrote:
> benefits: 95% install on web connected PC's around the world, no
> proprietary player required,
Firstly, Flash IS proprietary software that you are requiring.
Secondly, I don't know how they find 95% Flash 7 players on a survey... or 89%
Java penetration in the same survey - that's plain crazy.
Anyone dealing with customers knows that you have to ask them whether they
click a blue 'i' to open their internet program because they have no idea at
all what they are using, and don't even know what a browser is.
So I figure the second question on the flash penetration survey:
http://www.macromedia.com/software/flash/survey/npd_survey/2_info.html
is pretty sure to weed-out any non-technical users.
I have about 10 computers I manage here, each have 2 or 3 browsers in use,
being Opera, Firefox and Konqueror . None of those 25 browsers have Flash 8,
and maybe 3 have Flash 7. All of the computers have a stand-alone media
player.
The reason for that is that it is only Internet Explorer that constantly bugs
you with alerts if Flash is not installed - other browsers just display a
yellow field where the Flash was embedded.
So this means much less irritating advertising on the internet.
OK, I'm probably that 5% left over in the survey. I guess that is why they
don't claim 100% penetration.
Anyway, I'm not saying you should not use your embedded flash players, by all
means do, but don't suppose that everyone has chosen to install or upgrade to
that particular plugin, and can actually see the content.
You can simply offer a link under the flash movie pointing to the mpeg file
"Open in stand alone player".
That way people can also download the movie, and they have a choice of which
viewer they would like to use.
Ok, rant over.
Richard.
Need to do remote user administration often, from different locations?
vnc repeater lets you send the client a small pre-configured file they click
to connect to you.
You host the repeater on a server,and both client and operator can be behind a
nat firewall, without configuring anything.
http://ultravnc.sourceforge.net/addons/repeater.html
From rich at richpoints.com Mon Apr 3 07:43:42 2006
From: rich at richpoints.com (Rich Points)
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 06:43:42 -0600
Subject: [thelist] Browser wants to download pages rather than browse them
Message-ID: <4431187E.3050207@richpoints.com>
Hi,
I just moved this site to a new host, http://clubsauce.com . When I
browse the site I keep getting asked if I want to download and save the
pages I'm browsing to. I don't know why this is happening.
I'm using SSI on this site and have the .htaccess file configured as follows
AddType text/html .html .htm
AddType text/x-server-parsed-html .shtml .sht
How can I fix this?
thanks
Rich
From ian at zstudio.co.uk Mon Apr 3 08:06:57 2006
From: ian at zstudio.co.uk (Ian Anderson)
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 14:06:57 +0100
Subject: [thelist] Script for M$IE only, or not
In-Reply-To: <30bd6ffd0604030237q4d37bb1dkc3b314b14091f4d8@mail.gmail.com>
References: <442EF509.9060205@ij.net> <200604020022.55554.richard.bennett@skynet.be> <442F941E.6000403@zstudio.co.uk>
<30bd6ffd0604030237q4d37bb1dkc3b314b14091f4d8@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <44311DF1.6050703@zstudio.co.uk>
Christian Heilmann wrote:
> document.all is supported by Mozilla but only in part:
> http://weblogs.asp.net/jgalloway/archive/2005/08/07/421798.aspx
> http://mozillanews.org/?article_date=2004-07-23+18-06-59 (aahhhrghh
> animated favicon!!!)
Holy cow. Luckily,
"So Firefox supports document.all, but says it doesn't. That means it
can evaluate document.all['elementName'], but alert(document.all) shows
false."
Sweet mother of moses, what a palaver.
Cheers
Ian
--
_________________________________________________
zStudio - Web development and accessibility
http://zStudio.co.uk
Snippetz.net - Online code library
File, manage and re-use your code snippets & links
http://snippetz.net
From dan at virtuawebtech.co.uk Mon Apr 3 08:09:28 2006
From: dan at virtuawebtech.co.uk (Dan Parry)
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 14:09:28 +0100
Subject: [thelist] Browser wants to download pages rather than browse
them
In-Reply-To: <4431187E.3050207@richpoints.com>
Message-ID: <20060403130931.50ECF56064A@virtuawebtech.co.uk>
The file I downloaded doesn't appear to have any extension at all... If this
is the case there is the problem :)
HTH
Dan
-----------------------------------------------------
Dan Parry
Senior Developer
Virtua Webtech Ltd
http://www.virtuawebtech.co.uk
-----Original Message-----
From: thelist-bounces at lists.evolt.org
[mailto:thelist-bounces at lists.evolt.org] On Behalf Of Rich Points
Sent: 03 April 2006 13:44
To: thelist
Subject: [thelist] Browser wants to download pages rather than browse them
Hi,
I just moved this site to a new host, http://clubsauce.com . When I
browse the site I keep getting asked if I want to download and save the
pages I'm browsing to. I don't know why this is happening.
I'm using SSI on this site and have the .htaccess file configured as follows
AddType text/html .html .htm
AddType text/x-server-parsed-html .shtml .sht
How can I fix this?
thanks
Rich
--
* * Please support the community that supports you. * *
http://evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
For unsubscribe and other options, including the Tip Harvester
and archives of thelist go to: http://lists.evolt.org
Workers of the Web, evolt !
__________ NOD32 1.1454 (20060321) Information __________
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com
From rich at richpoints.com Mon Apr 3 08:20:18 2006
From: rich at richpoints.com (Rich Points)
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 07:20:18 -0600
Subject: [thelist] Browser wants to download pages rather than browse
them
In-Reply-To: <20060403130931.50ECF56064A@virtuawebtech.co.uk>
References: <20060403130931.50ECF56064A@virtuawebtech.co.uk>
Message-ID: <44312112.1010701@richpoints.com>
It should have a .shtml file extension, you will get the same thing if
you go to http://clubsauce.com/index.shtml
Also here are all the lines for the SSI in my .htaccess
RewriteEngine On
RewriteBase /
Options +Includes
AddType text/html .html .htm
AddType text/x-server-parsed-html .shtml .sht
Thanks
Rich
Dan Parry wrote:
>The file I downloaded doesn't appear to have any extension at all... If this
>is the case there is the problem :)
>
>HTH
>
>Dan
>
>-----------------------------------------------------
>Dan Parry
>Senior Developer
>Virtua Webtech Ltd
>http://www.virtuawebtech.co.uk
>-----Original Message-----
>From: thelist-bounces at lists.evolt.org
>[mailto:thelist-bounces at lists.evolt.org] On Behalf Of Rich Points
>Sent: 03 April 2006 13:44
>To: thelist
>Subject: [thelist] Browser wants to download pages rather than browse them
>
>Hi,
>I just moved this site to a new host, http://clubsauce.com . When I
>browse the site I keep getting asked if I want to download and save the
>pages I'm browsing to. I don't know why this is happening.
>
>I'm using SSI on this site and have the .htaccess file configured as follows
>
>AddType text/html .html .htm
>AddType text/x-server-parsed-html .shtml .sht
>
>
>How can I fix this?
>
>thanks
>Rich
>
>
From morrison.ben at gmail.com Mon Apr 3 08:25:25 2006
From: morrison.ben at gmail.com (ben morrison)
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 14:25:25 +0100
Subject: [thelist] Browser wants to download pages rather than browse
them
In-Reply-To: <4431187E.3050207@richpoints.com>
References: <4431187E.3050207@richpoints.com>
Message-ID: <6073aef90604030625u20225f66v42da6965027be692@mail.gmail.com>
On 4/3/06, Rich Points wrote:
> Hi,
> I just moved this site to a new host, http://clubsauce.com . When I
> browse the site I keep getting asked if I want to download and save the
> pages I'm browsing to. I don't know why this is happening.
>
> I'm using SSI on this site and have the .htaccess file configured as follows
>
> AddType text/html .html .htm
> AddType text/x-server-parsed-html .shtml .sht
> How can I fix this?
So it works in Explorer, but firefox asks for you to save/open it.
My guess would be that this is the main problem with using XHTML and
IE6 does not support application/xhtml+xml
Although i know nothing of server settings.
Ben
From rich at richpoints.com Mon Apr 3 08:39:16 2006
From: rich at richpoints.com (Rich Points)
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 07:39:16 -0600
Subject: [thelist] Browser wants to download pages...SOVED
In-Reply-To: <6073aef90604030625u20225f66v42da6965027be692@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4431187E.3050207@richpoints.com>
<6073aef90604030625u20225f66v42da6965027be692@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <44312584.7070103@richpoints.com>
I just took those lines out of my .htaccess file and now it's working :-)
Thanks to those who looked at it
Rich
From misterhaan at track7.org Mon Apr 3 08:43:39 2006
From: misterhaan at track7.org (misterhaan)
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 08:43:39 -0500
Subject: [thelist] Browser wants to download pages rather than browse
them
In-Reply-To: <4431187E.3050207@richpoints.com>
References: <4431187E.3050207@richpoints.com>
Message-ID: <4431268B.3010000@track7.org>
When I browse to your site with Firefox I get a download window saying
the file is a text/x-server-parsed-html, which means that is what the
server is sending in the Content-Type header. You might need to bug the
host to get them to send something more appropriate (like text/html),
unless there's a way to specify the header using SSI.
Rich Points wrote:
> Hi,
> I just moved this site to a new host, http://clubsauce.com . When I
> browse the site I keep getting asked if I want to download and save the
> pages I'm browsing to.
From ccollins at loudjoy.com Mon Apr 3 08:50:26 2006
From: ccollins at loudjoy.com (Christy Collins)
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 09:50:26 -0400
Subject: [thelist] client to post video
In-Reply-To: <200604031138.19921.richard.bennett@skynet.be>
References: <029c01c653fe$83f5cb00$6400a8c0@nnepacorp.com>
<98C4FC06-76D9-49E3-8B3A-8B7AB235D0E2@loudjoy.com>
<005b01c656ae$2f37c480$2002a8c0@2GHZDADSXP>
<200604031138.19921.richard.bennett@skynet.be>
Message-ID:
Is an mpeg file viewable in any stand alone player? Mac or PC?
-Christy
On Apr 3, 2006, at 5:38 AM, Richard Bennett wrote:
> You can simply offer a link under the flash movie pointing to the
> mpeg file
> "Open in stand alone player".
> That way people can also download the movie, and they have a choice
> of which
> viewer they would like to use.
From JCanfield at PacAdvantage.org Mon Apr 3 10:03:49 2006
From: JCanfield at PacAdvantage.org (Canfield, Joel)
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 08:03:49 -0700
Subject: [thelist] hidden span breaks form value?
Message-ID:
> On 01/04/06, Canfield, Joel wrote:
> > > value="Data_Entry_Error" onclick="toggleVis('deerror',this);" />
>
> Well, what does the toggleVis function do exactly? On the other radio
> buttons, you're passing it a string, but this time, your
> passing it the whole input element.
Here's toggleVis in its entirety:
function toggleVis(toggleID,clickedID)
{
if (clickedID.checked == true)
{
document.getElementById(toggleID).style.visibility = "visible";
} else {
document.getElementById(toggleID).style.visibility = "hidden";
}
}
This use of toggleVis, just above the one in question, works as
expected, using 'this':
Problem
Request
Project
which is why I suspect something about the hidden span, but can't find
anything to confirm or explain.
thanks
joel
From mrmazda at ij.net Mon Apr 3 10:07:25 2006
From: mrmazda at ij.net (Felix Miata)
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 11:07:25 -0400
Subject: [thelist] Script for M$IE only, or not
In-Reply-To: <442EF509.9060205@ij.net>
References: <442EF509.9060205@ij.net>
Message-ID: <44313A2D.20709@ij.net>
On 06/04/01 16:47 Felix Miata apparently typed:
> My understanding of JS is next to 0, so every time I want to do the
> simplest thing I haven't done before I have to go struggle through some
> tutorial, this time at http://www.quirksmode.org/. Again, I'm getting
> nowhere with something that seems it should be simple. I just want to
> throw an alert based upon whether the browser is really IE or any other
> browser. It seems object detection is the way to go, but I'm not finding
> a suitable object to detect. Someone suggested window.ActiveXControl but
> NAICT it seems that that is an option that can be disabled and so
> wouldn't be suitable. Can anyone help?
FWIW, the URL in my .sig below is the page for which I asked. Opening it
with IE should make evident why I only want the event to occur if the
visitor is really using IE and not some impostor like Opera.
The current possibly too simple solution actually came from a discussion
on irc://moznet/js and will most likely need revision when IE7 goes GA,
and that presumes I won't change my mind about the whole idea before
that happens.
Comments welcome, particularly if you have ideas about who you think the
target audience for the page is. What actually triggered my idea for it
in the first place is the core of
http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/css/colstyle.css which as yet I use only on 4
pages.
--
"Have nothing to do with the fruitless deeds of darkness, but
rather expose them." Ephesians 5:11 NIV
Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409
Felix Miata *** http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/auth/auth
From mwarden at gmail.com Mon Apr 3 10:39:19 2006
From: mwarden at gmail.com (Matt Warden)
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 11:39:19 -0400
Subject: [thelist] hidden span breaks form value?
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID: <443141A7.1000809@gmail.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Canfield, Joel wrote:
>>On 01/04/06, Canfield, Joel wrote:
>>
>>> >>value="Data_Entry_Error" onclick="toggleVis('deerror',this);" />
>>
>>Well, what does the toggleVis function do exactly? On the other radio
>>buttons, you're passing it a string, but this time, your
>>passing it the whole input element.
>
>
> Here's toggleVis in its entirety:
>
> function toggleVis(toggleID,clickedID)
> {
> if (clickedID.checked == true)
clickedID is a string. This should be:
if (document.getElementById(clickedID) &&
document.getElementById(clickedID).checked == true)
> class="rdospace" onclick="toggleVis('impactdiv',this);" /> Project
Well, in this one you are passing the object. All the other times you're
calling toggleVis you're passing the ID. I don't remember your original
issue, but could that be causing it?
- --
Matt Warden
Miami University
Oxford, OH, USA
http://mattwarden.com
This email proudly and graciously contributes to entropy.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEMUGnrI3LObhzHRMRAu6NAJ4+h+1EL9eJB530QuXsbG4M7FNiNACgjJ6v
Vcke87HKyJpOvkwiY8PyCTY=
=3363
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From JCanfield at PacAdvantage.org Mon Apr 3 10:44:31 2006
From: JCanfield at PacAdvantage.org (Canfield, Joel)
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 08:44:31 -0700
Subject: [thelist] hidden span breaks form value?
Message-ID:
> > value="Project"
> > class="rdospace" onclick="toggleVis('impactdiv',this);" />
> Project
>
> Well, in this one you are passing the object. All the other
> times you're
> calling toggleVis you're passing the ID. I don't remember
> your original
> issue, but could that be causing it?
This is the instance that's working. Another instance, followed by a
hidden span, is failing. I'll investigate the difference between
handling the object vs. passing a string, but I still suspect it's where
they're different that it's breaking.
joel
From richard.bennett at skynet.be Mon Apr 3 10:45:23 2006
From: richard.bennett at skynet.be (Richard Bennett)
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 17:45:23 +0200
Subject: [thelist] client to post video
In-Reply-To:
References: <029c01c653fe$83f5cb00$6400a8c0@nnepacorp.com>
<200604031138.19921.richard.bennett@skynet.be>
Message-ID: <200604031745.23177.richard.bennett@skynet.be>
On Monday 03 April 2006 15:50, Christy Collins wrote:
> Is an mpeg file viewable in any stand alone player? ?Mac or PC?
Not sure about 'any', but i have always been able to play them without
problems, which I cannot say for .mov, .avi, .wmv, .swf and others.
The main difference is that mpeg videos are downloaded, and then played (this
sometimes happens in the browser if you have a plugin installed) while other
formats will stream (they start playing when part of the file has been
buffered), but are not so portable, across platforms or browsers.
http://www.w3schools.com/media/media_videoformats.asp
If you can, I would use whatever format you prefer, and then offer mpeg as an
additional option for users to download if your solution doesn't work for
them.
Cheers,
Richard.
From codepo8 at gmail.com Mon Apr 3 11:09:35 2006
From: codepo8 at gmail.com (Christian Heilmann)
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 17:09:35 +0100
Subject: [thelist] Script for M$IE only, or not
In-Reply-To: <44313A2D.20709@ij.net>
References: <442EF509.9060205@ij.net> <44313A2D.20709@ij.net>
Message-ID: <30bd6ffd0604030909hcfba133l3afb25d045b3c3a@mail.gmail.com>
> FWIW, the URL in my .sig below is the page for which I asked. Opening it
> with IE should make evident why I only want the event to occur if the
> visitor is really using IE and not some impostor like Opera.
http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/js/iebad.js is soo 1990ies. What about users
who cannot change their browser as their company dictates the IT
environment? A practice like this is as arrogant and obtrusive as a
"only for MSIE and 1024x768 resolution" message.
From Conleyj at kubota-kma.com Mon Apr 3 11:15:10 2006
From: Conleyj at kubota-kma.com (James Conley)
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 12:15:10 -0400
Subject: [thelist] Script for M$IE only, or not
Message-ID:
As it currently stands you could just as well write the words "I hate
IE. If you are using IE then go away" and it would be no less IE
friendly.
While I understand the reasoning for your message a pop-up box worded as
such is less than friendly. Perhaps some header text would be more
appropriate. Another thought - what if a user is using Firefox but is
planning on implementing something that needs to be IE friendly.
James c.
-----Original Message-----
From: thelist-bounces at lists.evolt.org
[mailto:thelist-bounces at lists.evolt.org] On Behalf Of Felix Miata
Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 11:07 AM
To: thelist at lists.evolt.org
Subject: Re: [thelist] Script for M$IE only, or not
On 06/04/01 16:47 Felix Miata apparently typed:
> My understanding of JS is next to 0, so every time I want to do the
> simplest thing I haven't done before I have to go struggle through
> some tutorial, this time at http://www.quirksmode.org/. Again, I'm
> getting nowhere with something that seems it should be simple. I just
> want to throw an alert based upon whether the browser is really IE or
> any other browser. It seems object detection is the way to go, but I'm
> not finding a suitable object to detect. Someone suggested
> window.ActiveXControl but NAICT it seems that that is an option that
> can be disabled and so wouldn't be suitable. Can anyone help?
FWIW, the URL in my .sig below is the page for which I asked. Opening it
with IE should make evident why I only want the event to occur if the
visitor is really using IE and not some impostor like Opera.
The current possibly too simple solution actually came from a discussion
on irc://moznet/js and will most likely need revision when IE7 goes GA,
and that presumes I won't change my mind about the whole idea before
that happens.
Comments welcome, particularly if you have ideas about who you think the
target audience for the page is. What actually triggered my idea for it
in the first place is the core of
http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/css/colstyle.css which as yet I use only on 4
pages.
--
"Have nothing to do with the fruitless deeds of darkness, but
rather expose them." Ephesians 5:11 NIV
Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409
Felix Miata *** http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/auth/auth
From Conleyj at kubota-kma.com Mon Apr 3 11:17:49 2006
From: Conleyj at kubota-kma.com (James Conley)
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 12:17:49 -0400
Subject: [thelist] Script for M$IE only, or not
Message-ID:
RE the "only for ...1024x768 resolution"
I always hate those. There is no reason other than laziness to design a
site that *must* be viewed at 1024x768.
James c.
-----Original Message-----
From: thelist-bounces at lists.evolt.org
[mailto:thelist-bounces at lists.evolt.org] On Behalf Of Christian Heilmann
Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 12:10 PM
To: thelist at lists.evolt.org
Subject: Re: [thelist] Script for M$IE only, or not
> FWIW, the URL in my .sig below is the page for which I asked. Opening
> it with IE should make evident why I only want the event to occur if
> the visitor is really using IE and not some impostor like Opera.
http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/js/iebad.js is soo 1990ies. What about users
who cannot change their browser as their company dictates the IT
environment? A practice like this is as arrogant and obtrusive as a
"only for MSIE and 1024x768 resolution" message.
--
* * Please support the community that supports you. * *
http://evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
For unsubscribe and other options, including the Tip Harvester and
archives of thelist go to: http://lists.evolt.org Workers of the Web,
evolt !
From codepo8 at gmail.com Mon Apr 3 11:50:47 2006
From: codepo8 at gmail.com (Christian Heilmann)
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 17:50:47 +0100
Subject: [thelist] client to post video
In-Reply-To: <200604031745.23177.richard.bennett@skynet.be>
References: <029c01c653fe$83f5cb00$6400a8c0@nnepacorp.com>
<200604031138.19921.richard.bennett@skynet.be>
<200604031745.23177.richard.bennett@skynet.be>
Message-ID: <30bd6ffd0604030950q942ce13y8e1aa8375095ee49@mail.gmail.com>
> > Is an mpeg file viewable in any stand alone player? Mac or PC?
There is a significant difference between mpg (MPEG-1) as used in VCDs
and MPEG-2 as used in DVDs. Simply renaming the file is not enough. If
you don't have a DVD decoder installed on the computer (which is
something that comes with DVD player software like WinDVD) then you
cannot play MPEG-2 files.
A really cool tool for converting DVDs to usable formats - especially
for the web and also ipods and other mobile gadget is mpegstreamclip
which is available for both PC and Mac:
http://www.apple.com/downloads/macosx/video/mpegstreamclip.html
A PC only tool that is sickeninly versatile when it comes to
conversion formats is SUPER http://www.erightsoft.com/Superdt.html
(yes, the site navigation is less than super).
Before using streamclip I did all my conversion stuff with XMPEG:
http://www.xmpeg.net/website/
Beware that there are 34325435435234123 different conversion programs
out there (rough estimate), and that 97.384% are total rubbish (actual
fact) and not worth their money.
HTH
Chris
--
Chris Heilmann
Blog: http://www.wait-till-i.com
Writing: http://icant.co.uk/
Binaries: http://www.onlinetools.org/
From mrmazda at ij.net Mon Apr 3 13:31:30 2006
From: mrmazda at ij.net (Felix Miata)
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 14:31:30 -0400
Subject: [thelist] Script for M$IE only, or not
In-Reply-To: <30bd6ffd0604030909hcfba133l3afb25d045b3c3a@mail.gmail.com>
References: <442EF509.9060205@ij.net> <44313A2D.20709@ij.net>
<30bd6ffd0604030909hcfba133l3afb25d045b3c3a@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <44316A02.5040901@ij.net>
On 06/04/03 12:09 Christian Heilmann apparently typed:
> Felix Miata wrote:
>> FWIW, the URL in my .sig below is the page for which I asked. Opening it
>> with IE should make evident why I only want the event to occur if the
>> visitor is really using IE and not some impostor like Opera.
> http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/js/iebad.js is soo 1990ies. What about users
> who cannot change their browser as their company dictates the IT
> environment? A practice like this is as arrogant and obtrusive as a
> "only for MSIE and 1024x768 resolution" message.
Obtrusive, no doubt. Arrogant, maybe. Might depend on who is expected to
see it and when. At least for now, it's only called by one page. Did you
even consider my last paragraph? In particular: "particularly if you
have ideas about who you think the target audience for the page is."
It's not intended for the general web population, but rather, a subset
that includes almost entirely site designers and reviewers, particularly
n00bs who design first or exclusively in IE instead of a
standards-compliant browser.
I thought about including a similar message on an about this site page,
but I really don't think making it easily accessible to those to whom it
isn't relevant is a better option.
--
"Have nothing to do with the fruitless deeds of darkness, but
rather expose them." Ephesians 5:11 NIV
Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409
Felix Miata *** http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/auth/auth
From mrmazda at ij.net Mon Apr 3 13:27:44 2006
From: mrmazda at ij.net (Felix Miata)
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 14:27:44 -0400
Subject: [thelist] Script for M$IE only, or not
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID: <44316920.5040504@ij.net>
A: Top-posters who don't trim mailing list footers and .sigs.
Q: What's the 2nd most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
A: Because it breaks the logical sequence of the discussion.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
On 06/04/03 12:15 James Conley apparently typed:
> From: Felix Miata
> Comments welcome, particularly if you have ideas about who you think the
> target audience for the page is. What actually triggered my idea for it
> in the first place is the core of
> http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/css/colstyle.css which as yet I use only on 4
> pages.
> While I understand the reasoning for your message a pop-up box worded as
> such is less than friendly.
Which was the reason for the above, looking for impressions/discussion
about the language.
> Perhaps some header text would be more
> appropriate.
You mean something non-M$IE users could easily see with styles turned off or
unsupported in their UA?
> Another thought - what if a user is using Firefox but is
> planning on implementing something that needs to be IE friendly.
How might that matter? That alert is not intended to be used site-wide.
--
"Have nothing to do with the fruitless deeds of darkness, but
rather expose them." Ephesians 5:11 NIV
Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409
Felix Miata *** http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/auth/auth
From jdowdell at adobe.com Mon Apr 3 14:04:29 2006
From: jdowdell at adobe.com (John Dowdell)
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 12:04:29 -0700
Subject: [thelist] Convert DVD video to the web
In-Reply-To: <4s3lvb$ct90tv@ozemail-mail.icp-qv1-irony1.iinet.net.au>
References: <4s3lvb$ct90tv@ozemail-mail.icp-qv1-irony1.iinet.net.au>
Message-ID: <443171BD.6000304@adobe.com>
Justin Zachan wrote:
> ... somehow I need
> to convert the DVD files to a format that I can import into Flash...
> On the DVD there are a bunch of file types but mostly .VOB files...
> So I guess the question is, what is the best method to convert this
> movie...???
I haven't tested the various third-party solutions, but searches on both
"vob to flv" and "dvd to flv" turn up translation utilities. (I've heard
many recommend Riva Video Encoder at rivavx.com, but I don't know if it
matches your content's filetypes.)
jd
--
John Dowdell . Adobe Developer Support . San Francisco CA USA
Weblog: http://weblogs.macromedia.com/jd
Aggregator: http://weblogs.macromedia.com/mxna
Technotes: http://www.macromedia.com/support/
Spam killed my private email -- public record is best, thanks.
From Conleyj at kubota-kma.com Mon Apr 3 14:19:00 2006
From: Conleyj at kubota-kma.com (James Conley)
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 15:19:00 -0400
Subject: [thelist] Script for M$IE only, or not
Message-ID:
>> While I understand the reasoning for your message a pop-up box worded
>> as such is less than friendly.
>Which was the reason for the above, looking for impressions/discussion
about the language.
In that case my suggestion is to avoid pop-up boxes like the plague.
>> Perhaps some header text would be more appropriate.
>You mean something non-M$IE users could easily see with styles turned
off or unsupported in their UA?
Something that ALL web users could easily see regardless of their
browser.
>> Another thought - what if a user is using Firefox but is planning on
>> implementing something that needs to be IE friendly.
>How might that matter? That alert is not intended to be used site-wide.
I obviously misunderstood the context of your material. I thought your
site listed resources for website designers/ coders/etc. If so then a
simple note to the effect of "Note: not all of these resources with with
IE, in fact most of them do not work with IE. You will have to use a
different browser if you want to use these resources."
From jdowdell at adobe.com Mon Apr 3 15:01:27 2006
From: jdowdell at adobe.com (John Dowdell)
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 13:01:27 -0700
Subject: [thelist] client to post video
In-Reply-To: <200604031138.19921.richard.bennett@skynet.be>
References: <029c01c653fe$83f5cb00$6400a8c0@nnepacorp.com> <98C4FC06-76D9-49E3-8B3A-8B7AB235D0E2@loudjoy.com> <005b01c656ae$2f37c480$2002a8c0@2GHZDADSXP>
<200604031138.19921.richard.bennett@skynet.be>
Message-ID: <44317F17.4090605@adobe.com>
Richard Bennett wrote:
> Firstly, Flash IS proprietary software that you are requiring.
?? Is that some type of reasoning, or just an excuse for an existing
prejudice, or...?
> I don't know how they find 95% Flash 7 players on a survey... or
> 89% Java penetration in the same survey - that's plain crazy.
Sorry, our bad, I don't see the methodology links on this front page
anymore:
http://www.macromedia.com/software/player_census/flashplayer/
I've sent out a change-request to get the "who" and the "how" of these
ongoing consumer audits more visible on those entry pages:
http://www.macromedia.com/software/player_census/npd/
http://www.macromedia.com/software/flash/survey/npd_survey/
Recap: Every three months for the last 7-8 years, NPD/MediaMetrix asks
members of their regular consumer focus groups "Can you see this page?
this page? how about this page? don't download anything new, but can you
see this now? how about this?" and so on.
Content from Flash Player 7 was viewable by about 95% of consumers
tested in December, not 97%, but that's still more than IE/Win or likely
"any modern browser". The truly startling stat in all this was that
Flash Player 8, with advanced graphics capabilities, was found on 50% of
consumer machines within three months of its release.
If you'll allow me to transgress the bounds of good taste for a moment:
HALF THE WEB HAD ITS CLIENTSIDE CAPABILITIES UPDATED IN ONLY THREE
MONTHS, OMFG THIS IS IMMENSE, IT BLOWS OUT ALL THIS TALK ABOUT AJAX AND
XAML AND WHATEVER WEB2.0 TOPIC DU JOUR IS ON THE BOARDS, HALF THE
INTERNET UPGRADED IN ONLY THREE MONTHS, WHAT ARE YOU BOTHERING WITH
GREASEMONKEY-SIZED AUDIENCES FOR? and so on.
Bottom line: Want to use video in a browser-based presentation? Use
Flash... makes the most sense.
(Yes, .MPG files work too, but you don't know how each audience
member will view it... some will call up a new page with QuickTime, some
will jump the visitor out to Windows Media Player, whatever. With Flash,
video is just another first-class citizen in the HTML content.)
--
John Dowdell . Adobe Developer Support . San Francisco CA USA
Weblog: http://weblogs.macromedia.com/jd
Aggregator: http://weblogs.macromedia.com/mxna
Technotes: http://www.macromedia.com/support/
Spam killed my private email -- public record is best, thanks.
From junkmail at lostcreektech.com Mon Apr 3 15:02:20 2006
From: junkmail at lostcreektech.com (Anonymous)
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 16:02:20 -0400
Subject: [thelist] Image rotator for ASP server
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID: <001001c65759$867fdbf0$0400a8c0@lostcreek01>
Greetings all,
We're currently working on a website for a client and they are using Windows
servers. Are there any relatively simple, easy apps/scripts/whatever out
there to display a random image each time a page is reloaded? We have
generally used rotator.php but it isn't working on their Windows servers.
On digest, so CCs to me would be much appreciated.
Thanks much,
Joseph
From junkmail at lostcreektech.com Mon Apr 3 15:54:21 2006
From: junkmail at lostcreektech.com (Anonymous)
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 16:54:21 -0400
Subject: [thelist] Image rotator for ASP server
In-Reply-To: <002401c6575c$f1a09ac0$0300000a@CJMLTP01>
Message-ID: <001701c65760$c8901300$0400a8c0@lostcreek01>
Am well aware of using search engines to find things on the net. If I wanted
to waste my time searching through dozens (or even hundreds) of products
that may or may not work or be what I am looking for, I would do a search.
Not all of us have time to sit and wade through the many results of a
search. However, it is usually much quicker and the results are better when
the search is narrowed down by recommendations of others familiar with the
desired product/services/etc.
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Marsh [mailto:thelist at cjmarsh.com]
Sent: Monday, 03 April, 2006 16:27
To: junkmail at lostcreektech.com
Subject: RE: [thelist] Image rotator for ASP server
Joseph
> We're currently working on a website for a client and they are using
> Windows servers. Are there any relatively simple, easy
> apps/scripts/whatever out there to display a random image each time a
> page is reloaded? We have generally used rotator.php but it isn't
> working on their Windows servers.
>
> On digest, so CCs to me would be much appreciated.
Regards
Chris Marsh
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.5/300 - Release Date: 03/04/2006
From thelist at cjmarsh.com Mon Apr 3 17:53:20 2006
From: thelist at cjmarsh.com (Chris Marsh)
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 23:53:20 +0100
Subject: [thelist] Image rotator for ASP server
In-Reply-To: <001701c65760$c8901300$0400a8c0@lostcreek01>
Message-ID: <002701c65771$67ebdeb0$0300000a@CJMLTP01>
Joseph
> Am well aware of using search engines to find things on the
> net. If I wanted to waste my time searching through dozens
> (or even hundreds) of products that may or may not work or be
> what I am looking for, I would do a search. Not all of us
> have time to sit and wade through the many results of a
> search. However, it is usually much quicker and the results
> are better when the search is narrowed down by
> recommendations of others familiar with the desired
> product/services/etc.
Some points for your consideration:
1. You have clearly done no research yourself, nor followed the link that I
helpfully provided. If you had, you would realised that you do not require a
"product", so much as a few lines of code. Had you followed my link, you
would have realised that it would not have taken you much longer than the
time it took you to type your response to my email to actually solve your
problem.
2. If you think it's a waste of your time for you to do the job that you're
paid for, then I don't quite understand why you would think that it's not a
waste of other people's time to help you for free.
3. I replied to you privately. I did this because nothing in the email I
sent would have benefited the list. It was a friendly nudge in the right
direction for someone that exhibited all the signs of a person in need of a
spanking with a clue stick. Do not post private correspondance to public
lists without the express permission of the author. It exhibits disregard
for the author, and disrespect for the list.
4. If you had responded with something along the lines of "thanks for the
resource, unfortunately I'm not well versed in ASP - could you suggest any
tutorials for beginners?" I would most probably have supplied you with links
to tutorials and written you a script that did exactly what you wanted to
boot. The moral of the story? If you put in at least some effort, then
others are more likely to match it for you. Put in no effort at all, and no
one's going to be very interested in your problems.
Of course, all of the above are my own opinions; I wouldn't presume to speak
on behalf of others.
Regards
Chris Marsh
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.5/300 - Release Date: 03/04/2006
From richard.bennett at skynet.be Mon Apr 3 18:25:34 2006
From: richard.bennett at skynet.be (Richard Bennett)
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 01:25:34 +0200
Subject: [thelist] client to post video
In-Reply-To: <44317F17.4090605@adobe.com>
References: <029c01c653fe$83f5cb00$6400a8c0@nnepacorp.com>
<200604031138.19921.richard.bennett@skynet.be>
<44317F17.4090605@adobe.com>
Message-ID: <200604040125.34908.richard.bennett@skynet.be>
On Monday 03 April 2006 22:01, John Dowdell wrote:
> Richard Bennett wrote:
> > Firstly, Flash IS proprietary software that you are requiring.
>
> ?? Is that some type of reasoning,
Why? there's nothing wrong with Flash being proprietary is there?
I mean, you haven't gone open source have you? I think i was just stating the
obvious:
Proprietary :
Private. Proprietary hardware and software are owned and controlled by a
single organization or individual. Contrast with open.
http://www.answers.com/proprietary&r=67
And you are requiring Flash, so i don't see what was unreasoned in that
statement.
> or just an excuse for an existing
> prejudice, or...?
I am only prejudiced against FUD. You might remember we had a discussion when
Macromedia launched that blue-print example - I think it was a pet shop -
that was supposed to be a best-practice example solving accessibility issues
with Flash, but was actually a horribly broken non-validating page using
hacks like hidden frames and inaccessible javascript links.
That was simply a bad example for beginning developers, and that needed to be
pointed out. I have nothing against Flash as such.
The same goes for this:
> Bottom line: Want to use video in a browser-based presentation? Use
> Flash... makes the most sense.
I would expect that you would come into contact with US government financed
projects, which automatically fall under the 508 accessibility guidelines.
When it comes to rich media the message has to be 'offer alternatives'
so i don't see how your reply is an improvement on my statement:
>>Anyway, I'm not saying you should not use your embedded flash players,
>>by all means do, but don't suppose that everyone has chosen to install or
>>upgrade to that particular plugin, and can actually see the content.
>>You can simply offer a link under the flash movie pointing to the mpeg file
>>"Open in stand alone player".
>>That way people can also download the movie, and they have a choice of which
>>viewer they would like to use.
I mean, what are you saying? You SHOULD suppose that everyone can view the
content? You SHOULDN'T bother offering alternatives? You SHOULD prevent users
from opening the files in a viewer of their choice?
How can advising people NOT to offer an alternative be better advice?
>
> > I don't know how they find 95% Flash 7 players on a survey... or
> > 89% Java penetration in the same survey - that's plain crazy.
>
> Sorry, our bad, I don't see the methodology links on this front page
> anymore:
> http://www.macromedia.com/software/player_census/flashplayer/
>
> I've sent out a change-request to get the "who" and the "how" of these
> ongoing consumer audits more visible on those entry pages:
> http://www.macromedia.com/software/player_census/npd/
> http://www.macromedia.com/software/flash/survey/npd_survey/
I found them - that is why i posted a link to the survey myself.
But are they really still using that survey? they are stuck at MAC OS7 and 8,
and Windows 95/98/NT.
Maybe you could expand your change-request, what would really help developers
is if the whole survey was published each time. That way we could judge
whether a representative pool of users was used, and see which platforms and
browsers are represented, are the same people used each time, and how pluggin
penetration varies across age-groups, location etc etc.
> Bottom line: Want to use video in a browser-based presentation? Use
> Flash... makes the most sense.
> (Yes, .MPG files work too, but you don't know how each audience
> member will view it... some will call up a new page with QuickTime, some
> will jump the visitor out to Windows Media Player, whatever. With Flash,
> video is just another first-class citizen in the HTML content.)
That's fine for a personal opinion, but not good advice for a webdeveloper.
In the nineties it was all about designers going crazy doing 'cutting-edge'
stuff, and simply requiring the users to adapt their software to suite the
site.
Now it is all about the websites being a service to the public, or the
customer. We want to give every visitor access to the data, be they using a
pda, an old pc with dialup, an accessibility aid, a corporate locked-down pc
or whatever.
This means we have to get away from the mindset of 'forcing' the user to do
this, and 'forcing' everything to display pixel-perfect, and open our design
to give the user choice. You say:
> (Yes, .MPG files work too, but you don't know how each audience
> member will view it.
That is the whole point! Empower the user to use the technology that best
suits their setup. Sure, code your fancy embedded player, but give the user a
choice. You are designing the page for the user, not for the designer.
let me round this mail off with an example:
http://rivablog.com/
This is a demo page for a flash movie encoder. You click the play button, and
watch the cyclist go. Slower... and slower... and slower...
My whole browser starts freezing-up, and the only way to stop the damn film is
to hit f5 to refresh the page.
So ok, my pc is a few years old, and my flash is v7, but the npd 95% doesn't
take into account that the user experience might be crap, so the designer
says, ho ho - 95% is enough for me, I'll force all users to watch this
embedded in their browser, so they don't break my layout.
So how many of that 95% actually have an enjoyable experience? And how many
are glad they don't get a chance to open the movie in a player that has a
stop button, and that can be scaled to a reasonable size? Maybe someone would
like to save it and email it to somebody? Nope... you are part of the 95% so
you view it in an icky little part of your browser because the designer
prefers it like that.
That's the difference between proprietary and open. the first has to push
their product exclusively whether or not it is the best solution, and the
second can use the best selection of tools for the job, and empower the user
to use what they prefer.
Regards,
Richard
Drupal CMS have just released Drupal 4.7.0 RC 1.
This is the first release candidate for version 4.7 which offers a lot of
improvements over version 4.6.
A few more release candidates are likely before v4.7 is finally released, but
this version should be stable enough to setup a test site to get the feel for
it, and maybe even to submit any bugs you find along the way.
From junkmail at lostcreektech.com Mon Apr 3 18:41:05 2006
From: junkmail at lostcreektech.com (Anonymous)
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 19:41:05 -0400
Subject: [thelist] Image rotator for ASP server
In-Reply-To: <002701c65771$67ebdeb0$0300000a@CJMLTP01>
Message-ID: <001801c65778$15ecf2a0$0400a8c0@lostcreek01>
1. I did in fact do a search before posting to the list. Several of the
"solutions" did not work. Thus, I asked on the list to see if anyone could
recommend a particular solution that worked well for them. Product, snippet
of code, solution, service, whatever. It was just a general term.
2. So we should all spend our time reinventing the wheel rather than making
use of the list? Why bother having the list then?
3. I posted to the list, I replied to the list. If there was actually
something in the response that was incriminating or proprietary, it would
have been removed. There wasn't, so I didn't.
4. I didn't need a tutorial. I was simply looking for recommendations.
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Marsh [mailto:thelist at cjmarsh.com]
Sent: Monday, 03 April, 2006 18:53
To: junkmail at lostcreektech.com
Cc: thelist at lists.evolt.org
Subject: RE: [thelist] Image rotator for ASP server
Joseph
> Am well aware of using search engines to find things on the net. If I
> wanted to waste my time searching through dozens (or even hundreds) of
> products that may or may not work or be what I am looking for, I would
> do a search. Not all of us have time to sit and wade through the many
> results of a search. However, it is usually much quicker and the
> results are better when the search is narrowed down by recommendations
> of others familiar with the desired product/services/etc.
Some points for your consideration:
1. You have clearly done no research yourself, nor followed the link that I
helpfully provided. If you had, you would realised that you do not require a
"product", so much as a few lines of code. Had you followed my link, you
would have realised that it would not have taken you much longer than the
time it took you to type your response to my email to actually solve your
problem.
2. If you think it's a waste of your time for you to do the job that you're
paid for, then I don't quite understand why you would think that it's not a
waste of other people's time to help you for free.
3. I replied to you privately. I did this because nothing in the email I
sent would have benefited the list. It was a friendly nudge in the right
direction for someone that exhibited all the signs of a person in need of a
spanking with a clue stick. Do not post private correspondance to public
lists without the express permission of the author. It exhibits disregard
for the author, and disrespect for the list.
4. If you had responded with something along the lines of "thanks for the
resource, unfortunately I'm not well versed in ASP - could you suggest any
tutorials for beginners?" I would most probably have supplied you with links
to tutorials and written you a script that did exactly what you wanted to
boot. The moral of the story? If you put in at least some effort, then
others are more likely to match it for you. Put in no effort at all, and no
one's going to be very interested in your problems.
Of course, all of the above are my own opinions; I wouldn't presume to speak
on behalf of others.
Regards
Chris Marsh
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.5/300 - Release Date: 03/04/2006
From jdowdell at adobe.com Mon Apr 3 18:57:30 2006
From: jdowdell at adobe.com (John Dowdell)
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 16:57:30 -0700
Subject: [thelist] client to post video
In-Reply-To: <200604040125.34908.richard.bennett@skynet.be>
References: <029c01c653fe$83f5cb00$6400a8c0@nnepacorp.com> <200604031138.19921.richard.bennett@skynet.be> <44317F17.4090605@adobe.com>
<200604040125.34908.richard.bennett@skynet.be>
Message-ID: <4431B66A.6040001@adobe.com>
Richard Bennett wrote:
> That's the difference between proprietary and open. the first has to push
> their product exclusively whether or not it is the best solution, and the
> second can use the best selection of tools for the job, and empower the user
> to use what they prefer.
As before, "??".
Maybe this thing I wrote three years ago can help:
"Is 'Open' and 'Shut' really open-and-shut?"
http://www.macromedia.com/devnet/jd_forum/jd026.html
My theme: Using "But it's *proprietary*!" as a reasoning to cut off some
of your choices may be doing yourself a disservice. Use what works for
the job... no need to get all religious about it.
jd
--
John Dowdell . Adobe Developer Support . San Francisco CA USA
Weblog: http://weblogs.macromedia.com/jd
Aggregator: http://weblogs.macromedia.com/mxna
Technotes: http://www.macromedia.com/support/
Spam killed my private email -- public record is best, thanks.
From jdowdell at adobe.com Mon Apr 3 19:13:50 2006
From: jdowdell at adobe.com (John Dowdell)
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 17:13:50 -0700
Subject: [thelist] Getting screenshots to look good in Word (and then
PDF)
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID: <4431BA3E.8080703@adobe.com>
Rob wrote:
> I'm trying to get a screenshot of
> a webpage to look decent within a PDF. Taking screenshots, saving as
> GIF, inserting into Word to add other guff, then printing to PDF. As
> soon as they hit Word they look pretty awful though, and then printing
> to PDF the quality is reduced even further (using both PrimoPDF and
> CutePDF).
Microsoft Word doesn't have as many PDF export options as the real tools
do... if you have Adobe Distiller, then this offers the most control
over bitmaps in PDFs. But the bigger issue here may be the number of
pixels in the image.
Computer interfaces and fonts are designed on a pixel-by-pixel basis. If
the image is resized even a little bit then those pixels must be
averaged together... you'll get JPEG-like artifacts even if you're
saving to pixel-accurate GIF or PNG.
I don't know of any real way to prettify printed screencaptures, at
least not without adding a lot more data to the file... if the screen
has 1024 dots by 768 dots, and you're going to a printer with 300 or
more dots per inch, then the result will tend to look blocky even if the
pixels aren't averaged together at all. But print-res images are large,
regardless... there's a hard choice to be made between compact files and
interpolating extra pixels into a screencap in case it's printed. Hard
either way.
jd
--
John Dowdell . Adobe Developer Support . San Francisco CA USA
Weblog: http://weblogs.macromedia.com/jd
Aggregator: http://weblogs.macromedia.com/mxna
Technotes: http://www.macromedia.com/support/
Spam killed my private email -- public record is best, thanks.
From Ken at adOpenStatic.com Mon Apr 3 19:23:41 2006
From: Ken at adOpenStatic.com (Ken Schaefer)
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 10:23:41 +1000
Subject: [thelist] Image rotator for ASP server
References: <001801c65778$15ecf2a0$0400a8c0@lostcreek01>
Message-ID: <160489103479AB4892187638EE7D1E691F4E79@kjserver1.kjhome.local>
Joseph,
Before you start asking other people to help you solve *your* problem (for
which you are being paid) for free (as in, we are working for you for free),
I think you should learn some etiquette. If you are going to persist with
this attitude, it just indicates that you think your time is more valuable
than mine. Is that really the way you want to come across? Do you really
think you'll get your problems solved this way?
a) As mentioned by Mark, it is extremely bad form to repost a private,
offlist, response back to the public list. If you have something to say to
Mark, please respond to him privately. If you wish to repost his private,
offlist, response back to the list, you should consult with him first.
b)
> If I wanted to waste my time searching through dozens (or even hundreds) of
> products that may or may not work or be what I am looking for, I would
> do a search. Not all of us have time to sit and wade through the many
> results of a search.
Not all of us have "time to waste" (in your words) helping you solve your
work problems for free either.
c)
> 1. I did in fact do a search before posting to the list. Several of the
> "solutions" did not work
And where is your evidence of said searching? And why don't you help out by
mentioning the products that didn't work, so we don't waste everyone's time
re-recommending them?
d)
> 2. So we should all spend our time reinventing the wheel rather than
> making use of the list? Why bother having the list then?
I believe you are mistaken about the purpose of this list. The list is here
so we can share knowledge, see topical issues, and gain help with complex
problems in a collaborative manner. It is not here as a substitute for doing
your own due diligence. It is not a substitute for Google. It is not free,
personal, support forum.
If you post a decent question, that explains what you want and shows that you
have put effort into solving your own problem, you will probably get more
detailed help from list members. We have better things to do than rekey
answers that have been provided before, or are available via Google. You
don't like that - tough. Hire someone, and they'll provide detailed answers
in a cheerful and comprehensive manner. If you want that some type of
information for free, you need to ask questions the smart way, and lose the
attitude.
You really need to read this:
http://www.adopenstatic.com/personal/help.asp
and
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
(but somehow I suspect you wont)
e) In answer to your question:
There are a large number of ways to do this. For example, if you have the
file details stored in a database, you can use a simple code snippet
(www.adOpenStatic.com/faq/randomrecord.asp) to select a random record from
your DB table. Or, you could do this client-side (by having a bit of
javascript that chooses a random record from an array). You could even have
your ASP write out the javascript arry dynamically. There are lots of
options, and since you haven't given us any details about how you want to
approach this, or what your existing setup is, there isn't a lot we can do.
Cheers
Ken
: -----Original Message-----
: From: thelist-bounces at lists.evolt.org [mailto:thelist-
: bounces at lists.evolt.org] On Behalf Of Anonymous
: Sent: Tuesday, 4 April 2006 9:41 AM
: To: thelist at lists.evolt.org
: Subject: Re: [thelist] Image rotator for ASP server
:
: 1. I did in fact do a search before posting to the list. Several of the
: "solutions" did not work. Thus, I asked on the list to see if anyone could
: recommend a particular solution that worked well for them. Product,
: snippet
: of code, solution, service, whatever. It was just a general term.
:
: 2. So we should all spend our time reinventing the wheel rather than
: making
: use of the list? Why bother having the list then?
:
: 3. I posted to the list, I replied to the list. If there was actually
: something in the response that was incriminating or proprietary, it would
: have been removed. There wasn't, so I didn't.
:
: 4. I didn't need a tutorial. I was simply looking for recommendations.
:
: -----Original Message-----
: From: Chris Marsh [mailto:thelist at cjmarsh.com]
: Sent: Monday, 03 April, 2006 18:53
: To: junkmail at lostcreektech.com
: Cc: thelist at lists.evolt.org
: Subject: RE: [thelist] Image rotator for ASP server
:
: Joseph
:
: > Am well aware of using search engines to find things on the net. If I
: > wanted to waste my time searching through dozens (or even hundreds) of
: > products that may or may not work or be what I am looking for, I would
: > do a search. Not all of us have time to sit and wade through the many
: > results of a search. However, it is usually much quicker and the
: > results are better when the search is narrowed down by recommendations
: > of others familiar with the desired product/services/etc.
:
: Some points for your consideration:
:
: 1. You have clearly done no research yourself, nor followed the link that
: I
: helpfully provided. If you had, you would realised that you do not require
: a
: "product", so much as a few lines of code. Had you followed my link, you
: would have realised that it would not have taken you much longer than the
: time it took you to type your response to my email to actually solve your
: problem.
:
: 2. If you think it's a waste of your time for you to do the job that
: you're
: paid for, then I don't quite understand why you would think that it's not
: a
: waste of other people's time to help you for free.
:
: 3. I replied to you privately. I did this because nothing in the email I
: sent would have benefited the list. It was a friendly nudge in the right
: direction for someone that exhibited all the signs of a person in need of
: a
: spanking with a clue stick. Do not post private correspondance to public
: lists without the express permission of the author. It exhibits disregard
: for the author, and disrespect for the list.
:
: 4. If you had responded with something along the lines of "thanks for the
: resource, unfortunately I'm not well versed in ASP - could you suggest any
: tutorials for beginners?" I would most probably have supplied you with
: links
: to tutorials and written you a script that did exactly what you wanted to
: boot. The moral of the story? If you put in at least some effort, then
: others are more likely to match it for you. Put in no effort at all, and
: no
: one's going to be very interested in your problems.
:
: Of course, all of the above are my own opinions; I wouldn't presume to
: speak
: on behalf of others.
:
: Regards
:
: Chris Marsh
From ian at zstudio.co.uk Mon Apr 3 19:29:26 2006
From: ian at zstudio.co.uk (Ian Anderson)
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 01:29:26 +0100
Subject: [thelist] Getting screenshots to look good in Word (and then
PDF)
In-Reply-To: <4431BA3E.8080703@adobe.com>
References:
<4431BA3E.8080703@adobe.com>
Message-ID: <4431BDE6.6060701@zstudio.co.uk>
John Dowdell wrote:
> I don't know of any real way to prettify printed screencaptures, at
> least not without adding a lot more data to the file... if the screen
> has 1024 dots by 768 dots, and you're going to a printer with 300 or
> more dots per inch, then the result will tend to look blocky even if the
> pixels aren't averaged together at all. But print-res images are large,
> regardless... there's a hard choice to be made between compact files and
> interpolating extra pixels into a screencap in case it's printed. Hard
> either way.
In my experience, you can still get good looking screen shots on desktop
laser printers even given the disparity of resolutions. The key is to
send all the original dots, irrespective of the physical resolution of
the screenshot, and don't allow interpolation or resampling to take
place before the printer gets the image. Sometimes it is not easy to
stop Acrobat from resampling images.
Cheers
Ian
--
_________________________________________________
zStudio - Web development and accessibility
http://zStudio.co.uk
Snippetz.net - Online code library
File, manage and re-use your code snippets & links
http://snippetz.net
From richard.bennett at skynet.be Mon Apr 3 20:13:51 2006
From: richard.bennett at skynet.be (Richard Bennett)
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 03:13:51 +0200
Subject: [thelist] client to post video
In-Reply-To: <4431B66A.6040001@adobe.com>
References: <029c01c653fe$83f5cb00$6400a8c0@nnepacorp.com>
<200604040125.34908.richard.bennett@skynet.be>
<4431B66A.6040001@adobe.com>
Message-ID: <200604040313.52428.richard.bennett@skynet.be>
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 01:57, John Dowdell wrote:
> Richard Bennett wrote:
> > That's the difference between proprietary and open. the first has to push
> > their product exclusively whether or not it is the best solution, and the
> > second can use the best selection of tools for the job, and empower the
> > user to use what they prefer.
>
> As before, "??".
I really did my very best to explain it as clearly as I could, and illustrate
it with an example.
> Maybe this thing I wrote three years ago can help:
> "Is 'Open' and 'Shut' really open-and-shut?"
> http://www.macromedia.com/devnet/jd_forum/jd026.html
It is not a technical question, it is a mindset.
Can you advise developers that your product might not be the best solution in
some cases? Can you advise them that although your product is great, offering
an alternative is a service to the user?
Or are you restricted to saying:
>>> Bottom line: Want to use video in a browser-based presentation? Use
>>> Flash... makes the most sense.
as though the rest of the world has no merit whatsoever.
> My theme: Using "But it's *proprietary*!" as a reasoning to cut off some
> of your choices may be doing yourself a disservice. Use what works for
> the job... no need to get all religious about it.
You seem to have misunderstood the sentence I wrote:
>> That's the difference between proprietary and open. the first has to push
>> their product exclusively whether or not it is the best solution, and the
>> second can use the best selection of tools for the job, and empower the
>> user to use what they prefer.
I am not talking about open source as such, but being open-minded.
Use Flash, or Mediaplayer, or Quicktime or whatever you want, and then offer
the user an alternative in case your preference isn't suitable for them.
Simple.
Advising developers to develop solely for one technology is simply bad advice.
It is nineties-talk. We would put up little badges saying "best viewed with
netscape 4", and have anti-rightclick scripts on our shitty pages to stop
people stealing our little tricks.
Times have changed. Your site should be a service to the user. You should do
your very best to put the user in control - let them choose what they want to
see, let them get there fast, without splash pages and intros, and offer them
the data in several formats.
It is just commonsense.
Regards.
Richard
In mysql, if you have a table like this:
id??????????????|name
22?????????????|red
12?????????????|red
45?????????????|red
3???????????????|pink
35?????????????|pink
and would like to export it to a spreadsheet looking like this:
ids |name
22,12,45 |red
3,35 |pink
You can use the mysql PROPRIETARY extension GROUP_CONCAT, like this:
SELECT GROUP_CONCAT(id), name
FROM tablename
GROUP BY name
From justin at jazzmanagement.com.au Mon Apr 3 22:43:39 2006
From: justin at jazzmanagement.com.au (Justin Zachan)
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 13:43:39 +1000
Subject: [thelist] Convert DVD video to the web
In-Reply-To: <005101c656aa$478e1240$2002a8c0@2GHZDADSXP>
Message-ID: <4sun1b$cl41vv@ozemail-mail.icp-qv1-irony2.iinet.net.au>
Hi there... Changing it to mpg and it certainly worked... And I can import
it into Flash OK... Thanks...
-----Original Message-----
From: Daryl Brown [mailto:mail at browncowmedia.com.au]
Sent: Monday, 3 April 2006 9:08 AM
To: justin at jazzmanagement.com.au; thelist at lists.evolt.org
Subject: Re: [thelist] Convert DVD video to the web
a VOB file is already an mpg file. Mpeg 2 actually. If you have an mpeg-2
decoder on your machine, just add ".mpg" to the biggest VOB file and it
should play - Of course depending on your flash encoding app and whether it
can read an mpeg2 file. Costs nothing to find out though!!
Daryl Brown
Digital Film Maker
Brown Cow Media
Sydney, Australia
www.browncowmedia.com.au
www.browncowdvd.com.au
>
> "First of all, what format are you on (PC or Mac). Second, and
> probably
most
> importantly, is the DVD copyrighted? You may be in violation if you
attempt
> this
>
> Todd"
>
> Answer - I use a PC, and the client has clearance to use the DVD in
> this way... Thanks...
>
From evoltlist at delime.com Mon Apr 3 22:47:46 2006
From: evoltlist at delime.com (M. Seyon)
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 23:47:46 -0400
Subject: [thelist] client to post video
In-Reply-To: <44317F17.4090605@adobe.com>
References: <200604031138.19921.richard.bennett@skynet.be>
<029c01c653fe$83f5cb00$6400a8c0@nnepacorp.com>
<98C4FC06-76D9-49E3-8B3A-8B7AB235D0E2@loudjoy.com>
<005b01c656ae$2f37c480$2002a8c0@2GHZDADSXP>
<200604031138.19921.richard.bennett@skynet.be>
Message-ID: <4.2.0.58.20060403233903.01e76988@mx.delime.com>
Message from John Dowdell (4/3/2006 01:01 PM)
>Recap: Every three months for the last 7-8 years, NPD/MediaMetrix asks
>members of their regular consumer focus groups
>Content from Flash Player 7 was viewable by about 95% of consumers
>tested in December,
>HALF THE WEB HAD ITS CLIENTSIDE CAPABILITIES UPDATED IN ONLY THREE
>MONTHS
Sorry, I know this probably goes against all the rules of statistics and
data analysis and survey conducting, but I've never bought into the theory
of "These are the results we found based on our study of 2000 people
therefore it must be valid for the other 6+ billion in the world."
A more accurate statement, to me, would have been, "Half of our sample
audience had its clientside capabilities..."
Also I believe the npd page you link to states clearly at the top of the
table with the 97% claim,
"Results (US only)".
Why don't I pay these US-centric surveys much heed? I'll give you one
reason - those genius geographers still haven't figured out that it's not a
good idea to lump the Caribbean in with Latin America, because then they're
tempted to pre-guess that they're Spanish speaking and push Spanish content
at us (VISA's website does just that). All well and good in South America
where probably 90+% speak Spanish natively. But for more than half of the
Caribbean, this does not hold true.
regards.
-marc
--
Trinidad Carnival in all its photographic glory. Playyuhself.com
http://www.playyuhself.com/
From volkan.ozcelik at gmail.com Tue Apr 4 00:14:42 2006
From: volkan.ozcelik at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-9?Q?VOLKAN_=D6Z=C7EL=DDK?=)
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 08:14:42 +0300
Subject: [thelist] Script for M$IE only, or not
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID:
>You mean something non-M$IE users could easily see with styles turned off
or
>unsupported in their UA?
Slightly deviating from the subject:
Who are going to joing "the first annual webmasters naked day?"
Will we be seeing evolt naked?
http://www.volkanozcelik.com/cre8/blog/2006/04/i-will-be-naked-for-one-full-day.html
Cheers :)
--
Volkan Ozcelik
+>Yep! I'm blogging! : http://www.volkanozcelik.com/volkanozcelik/blog/
+> My projects/studies/trials/errors : http://www.sarmal.com/
From codepo8 at gmail.com Tue Apr 4 00:47:48 2006
From: codepo8 at gmail.com (Christian Heilmann)
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 06:47:48 +0100
Subject: [thelist] Script for M$IE only, or not
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID: <30bd6ffd0604032247w7aa14fb6yde5413c837177b1c@mail.gmail.com>
> Slightly deviating from the subject:
> Who are going to joing "the first annual webmasters naked day?"
> Will we be seeing evolt naked?
>
> http://www.volkanozcelik.com/cre8/blog/2006/04/i-will-be-naked-for-one-full-day.html
What an amazingly fresh and great new idea! I'll be declaring
"Celebrate me for being a cool hip web designer day" on April the
12th, to show how amazing web designers are, let's all wear kippers on
our heads and jump on one foot all day!
1998 saw greyday that called all web designers to grey out their web
site to show what it looked like if all copyright infringement were to
be followed up as lawsuits:
http://web.archive.org/web/19990224113837/www.greyday.org/main.html
The original site is a domain squatter thingy now but this spoof is to
the point:
http://www.ntk.net/grey.html
Techheads also countered with grayday basically telling the design
community not to get their knickers in a twist:
http://web.archive.org/web/20010415065738/grayday.org/main.html
My personal $.02: Can we stop the self indulgence and thinking people
really care about our personal blogs and how we achieve some technical
stunt and concentrate on what we offer the visitors in terms of
information instead of celebrating ourselves?
Sorry for sounding grumpy, but putting a lot of time and effort into
an idea like http://csstoolshed.com and receiving nearly no
submissions whatsoever makes me really angry at memes pointing to
personal blogs and wasting our time advocating to the already
enlightened.
If you want to raise awareness about CSS and semantic markup and that
web sites can work without CSS a real web site for the cause, backed
up by a body like the W3C or WaSP and acccompanied by press releases
in the mainstream press with explanations as to the whys and hows for
non-techie people might have some impact, this is just celebrating
ourselves and there has certainly not been a lack of that in the past.
From volkan.ozcelik at gmail.com Tue Apr 4 01:26:32 2006
From: volkan.ozcelik at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-9?Q?VOLKAN_=D6Z=C7EL=DDK?=)
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 09:26:32 +0300
Subject: [thelist] Script for M$IE only, or not
In-Reply-To: <30bd6ffd0604032247w7aa14fb6yde5413c837177b1c@mail.gmail.com>
References:
<30bd6ffd0604032247w7aa14fb6yde5413c837177b1c@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID:
> What an amazingly fresh and great new idea!
I truly understand your feelings, Chris. Especially on css toolshed.
I was one of those, who promised to do something for it, but was unable to
contribute because of lack of time. Shame on me.
My personal $.02: Can we stop the self indulgence and thinking people
> really care about our personal blogs and how we achieve some technical
> stunt and concentrate on what we offer the visitors in terms of
> information instead of celebrating ourselves?
I see. However, people like me may not have adequate time, because
constructing such a site - especially a site with good content and quality
to take non-techy-savy users' attention - requires a lot of time and effort.
So, imho ymmv etc., making tens of thousands of sited "naked" for one day is
a striking way to make people wonder "what the heck is going on the web?".
I'm curious about the viral effect it will make. (btw, I'm preparing an MBA
thesis on "viral marketing" and its impact on "social networks" -the full
problem statement is more elagant but simply that's what the thesis about in
plain old english- and this issue is sorta my special interest for the time
being)
At least some will google "naked day" etc and find some valuable sites
explaining why they are "naked" for one day.
To sum up, if you have limited time and you want to react somehow, there's
nothing easier than renaming your /lib/css folder to /lib/hide-css/ for one
day. It will take at most one minute!
If you want to raise awareness about CSS and semantic markup and that
> web sites can work without CSS a real web site for the cause, backed
> up by a body like the W3C or WaSP and acccompanied by press releases
> in the mainstream press with explanations
If one of my "magic" projects hold and I become prosperous enough so that I
may not need to think about how to earn a living; I promise I will devote my
time collaborating in those projects as well as creating my own like-minded
projects.
And I am serious on that. Really.
Cheers,
--
Volkan Ozcelik
+>Yep! I'm blogging! : http://www.volkanozcelik.com/volkanozcelik/blog/
+> My projects/studies/trials/errors : http://www.sarmal.com/
From codepo8 at gmail.com Tue Apr 4 01:55:27 2006
From: codepo8 at gmail.com (Christian Heilmann)
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 07:55:27 +0100
Subject: [thelist] Script for M$IE only, or not
In-Reply-To:
References:
<30bd6ffd0604032247w7aa14fb6yde5413c837177b1c@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <30bd6ffd0604032355p56107bdlf468e3cc54b76a1c@mail.gmail.com>
> My personal $.02: Can we stop the self indulgence and thinking people
> > really care about our personal blogs and how we achieve some technical
> > stunt and concentrate on what we offer the visitors in terms of
> > information instead of celebrating ourselves?
> I see. However, people like me may not have adequate time, because
> constructing such a site - especially a site with good content and quality
> to take non-techy-savy users' attention - requires a lot of time and effort.
That is what collaboration is for. The CSS-discuss Wiki is a good
example, albeit deteriorating at the moment, too. Could it be because
we spend our time writing about how cool we are and recording podcasts
talking to other cool web developers about how adding another CSS
selector has made our lives complete?
> So, imho ymmv etc., making tens of thousands of sited "naked" for one day is
> a striking way to make people wonder "what the heck is going on the web?".
It might, but I don't see tens of thousands of pages, and I certainly
consider the restrictions ridiculous:
quote
There's not much details about it. This is merely to see if you're up
to the challenge to put your website on the line. If you run an
e-commerce website, you ought not participate; this is purely for
those with personal blogs or for those who run publications
or?whatever. All the more props to you if you run a large website!
unquote
Why not e-commerce web sites? This is the sort of wishy washy
commitment I sense a lot with these kind of ideas. Yeah, take part but
keep well out of the business arena, lord knows we don't want those
guys to get wise on web standards, do we?
So all the sites on the list are personal blogs that already dwell in
the webesign/webdevelopment arena - and I don't see that many big ones
there. I will do the roundabout test and ask in the office later today
if anyone in the PM pool or Technical Architects - the people making
decisions about what products to use to develop a site heard about
the idea :-)
> To sum up, if you have limited time and you want to react somehow, there's
> nothing easier than renaming your /lib/css folder to /lib/hide-css/ for one
> day. It will take at most one minute!
So does buying a sandwich at the local off-license and you ensure that
it will be there tomorrow, too, instead of a big supermarket chain
outlet. Might have more impact.
> If one of my "magic" projects hold and I become prosperous enough so that I
> may not need to think about how to earn a living; I promise I will devote my
> time collaborating in those projects as well as creating my own like-minded
> projects.
>
> And I am serious on that. Really.
Nobody asks yous to do anything, you do a tremendous job answering
questions here in a well-researched and proper manner, that has a
great impact although you may not be aware of it.
And either this or an advertising campaign catered at the decision
makers OUTSIDE the design/web development community will help raise
CSS awareness. However, CSS is a tool, like a shovel is a tool or
nailclippers are, it is not a religion or something someone who does
not develop or publish on the web really cares about.
There is also no need for them to care, IMHO. There is nothing worse
than having to deliver a project with some half-knowledged guy trying
to show off by pointing out personal web sites or blog entries that
show what can be done. "Yes, I know this site has CSS image galleries,
however, yours will be maintained in .NET and with a CMS and we cannot
create one template for each image". We could though, but that will
raise the budget and the development time by 500%. Want me to
re-calculate?
From codepo8 at gmail.com Tue Apr 4 04:43:33 2006
From: codepo8 at gmail.com (Christian Heilmann)
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 10:43:33 +0100
Subject: [thelist] [job] Head of Front end development, London UK
Message-ID: <30bd6ffd0604040243s87935b0vc4eaa95293c7629b@mail.gmail.com>
Hopefully this is OK with the admins here. We are looking to replace
me at the company I am working at the moment as I resigned to move on
next week.
So if you are
- an experienced Lead web developer
- can lead a team of 3 developers in the UK and 5 in India
- got an expert knowledge in web standard technologies
- up to speed on accessibility issues and legal requirements
- got experience with integrating several different frameworks (.NET,
spring) and different CMS (Tridion, Immediacy, Joomla)
And if you want to
- work in southwest London (Hammersmith)
- work with clients like McDonalds, HP, Visit Britain, Last Minute and lots more
- get a competitive wage
- are available quickly and looking for a permanent position
Drop me a line, and I will give you a buzz.
Sorry about this spam, and about it being UK-centric, but it is an
opportunity and I rather get someone in place that knows his stuff
than lots of agencies sending us CVs to fill up their contact quota.
cheers
Chris
--
Chris Heilmann
Blog: http://www.wait-till-i.com
Writing: http://icant.co.uk/
Binaries: http://www.onlinetools.org/
From dwayne.conyers at hp.com Tue Apr 4 08:04:12 2006
From: dwayne.conyers at hp.com (Conyers, Dwayne)
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 08:04:12 -0500
Subject: [thelist] [job] Head of Front end development, London UK
Message-ID:
The prospect of going back to London doesn't appeal to me but hopefully
you will find the right person(s). Cheers.
--
Dwacon
www.dwacon.com
From bedouglas at earthlink.net Tue Apr 4 10:20:05 2006
From: bedouglas at earthlink.net (bruce)
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 08:20:05 -0700
Subject: [thelist] Ad Server/Ad Management Application
Message-ID: <102301c657fb$412e29b0$0301a8c0@Mesa.com>
Hi,
I'm trying to find an app/product that can met my needs. I'd like an app
that would allow vendors/advertisers to create ads and have the ads display
on a given website(s). I'd like tha app to be able to allow the advertiser
to also be charged for the ability to place the ad. I'd also like the
ability to be able to provide the advertiser the ability to either place an
ad on the site, or to email an add to a given population of users on the
site...
I've looked at various apps on the net, as well as trying to call
Doubelclick, etc... with no real luck.
Any thoughts/ideas/comments????
Thanks
-Bruce
bedouglas at earthlink.net
From hut at hockeymail.com Tue Apr 4 11:03:21 2006
From: hut at hockeymail.com (Eduardo)
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 12:03:21 -0400
Subject: [thelist] Ad Server/Ad Management Application
In-Reply-To: <102301c657fb$412e29b0$0301a8c0@Mesa.com>
References: <102301c657fb$412e29b0$0301a8c0@Mesa.com>
Message-ID: <443298C9.8010803@hockeymail.com>
There's phpAdsNew at http://phpadsnew.com/two/ and also Max Media
Manager at https://trac.openads.org/. Both are very good but MMM seems
to perform better than the first one.
Eduardo
bruce wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to find an app/product that can met my needs. I'd like an app
> that would allow vendors/advertisers to create ads and have the ads display
> on a given website(s). I'd like tha app to be able to allow the advertiser
> to also be charged for the ability to place the ad. I'd also like the
> ability to be able to provide the advertiser the ability to either place an
> ad on the site, or to email an add to a given population of users on the
> site...
>
> I've looked at various apps on the net, as well as trying to call
> Doubelclick, etc... with no real luck.
>
> Any thoughts/ideas/comments????
>
> Thanks
>
> -Bruce
> bedouglas at earthlink.net
>
From potatosculptor at gmail.com Tue Apr 4 13:23:12 2006
From: potatosculptor at gmail.com (sam foster)
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 13:23:12 -0500
Subject: [thelist] JSON and Client-side classes
In-Reply-To: <11DFAB97-BA21-47E8-AF84-C0F41AC58E59@attensa.com>
References: <11DFAB97-BA21-47E8-AF84-C0F41AC58E59@attensa.com>
Message-ID: <9e3dd260604041123w3564c10du17eef963a88e7433@mail.gmail.com>
You could get the data to create your Person instance from a JSON
string.. is that what you are asking?
PersonObject = function(props) {
for(var key in props) {
this[key] = props[key];
}
}
var person1 = new PersonObject( parseJSON(someJsonString) );
which is just a simplistic example. I prefer this model of passing
arguments into a construtor anyway. You could support either by
switching on the length of arguments, and/or the typeof the first
argument.
hth
Sam
On 3/7/06, Mark Baldwin wrote:
> Greetings all,
>
> I've been playing around with JSON and I can't seem to find the
> answer to the following:
>
> Lets say you have a JS include that defines an object such as
>
> PersonObject = function() {
> this.name = '';
> this.age = '';
> }
>
> Is it possible, via JSON, to eval a string such that it would create
> a new instance of a person object? A bonus would be a way of doing it
> without creating an incredibly large, and obscene, constructor.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Mark
From jblanchard at pocket.com Tue Apr 4 13:31:31 2006
From: jblanchard at pocket.com (Jay Blanchard)
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 13:31:31 -0500
Subject: [thelist] Out with tradition? GET or POST
Message-ID: <56608562F6D5D948B22F5615E3F57E6921BD31@YGEX01WAL.onecall.local>
I thought this to be unusual;
I was validating some pages for an upcoming project and got this as my
only error;
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
Below are the results of checking this document for XML well-formedness
and validity.
Error Line 15 column 29: value of attribute "method" cannot be "POST";
must be one of "get", "post".