[thelist] accessible way to indicate that a form field is required
Barney Carroll
barney at textmatters.com
Fri Nov 17 12:03:49 CST 2006
Max Schwanekamp wrote:
> True enough, but how does a screen reader treat an asterisk? I'd think
> it would be irritating to hear "asterisk" after all the required fields.
> "Fields marked with an asterisk (asterisk) are required. First Name
> asterisk...Last Name asterisk...Email asterisk..." etc.
Perhaps - and whereas I agree that the word 'asterisk' is aesthetically
more ugly than 'bold'... It's just as much of an obstacle to what would
be relatively human speech. An invisible entry of '- this field is
required' would be the alternative to using 'non-speech' denotation.
I can see this conversation deteriorating (or ascending) into a
combination of pure philosophy and idle speculation about the behaviour
of screen readers - which I have stoked on many discussion lists and
boards, and most of which were pretty reasonably closed by admin because
of their vague and OT nature. I did make contact with somebody who you
might find useful, one Steve Green who directs Test Partners Ltd, an
accessibility testing company. They regularly run seminars open to the
public during which partial and non- sighted people surf sites using JAWS.
www.testpartners.co.uk
Regards,
Barney
More information about the thelist
mailing list