[thelist] ASP - Response.Write

Don't know - I'd guess so, though. All I know is what our server
management guys tell us ie that processing .stm files takes
a hell of a lot less overhead than .asp files for simple includes.

Cheers
Martin Burns
xtn 20867
External tel: 0131 523 0867
mobile: 0793 151 8480
> <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Leo Wiedersheim [SMTP:Leo.Wiedersheim@roxy.com]
> Sent:	Monday, December 20, 1999 4:11 PM
> To:	'thelist@lists.evolt.org'
> Subject:	RE: [thelist] ASP - Response.Write
> 
> 
> *** Warning : this message originates from the Internet ****
> 
> Martin,
> Interesting tip...  Do you know if the shtml interpreter is native to IIS?
> Or, is this something of an add-on?
> 
> Leo.
> 
> ~
> Leo P. Wiedersheim, Jr.
> leo@wiedersheim.com
> http://www.Wiedersheim.com
> http://www.CampaignCollectibles.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Burns, Martin [mailto:BURNSM@rbos.co.uk]
> Sent: Monday, December 20, 1999 4:59 AM
> To: 'thelist@lists.evolt.org'
> Subject: RE: [thelist] ASP - Response.Write
> 
> 
> <tip type='IIS performance gains for SSI'>
> If all your ASP page has in it other than static HTML is a simple include
> (ie one which doesn't do any processing, just drops a common (say)
> footer into the page), don't have it as an .asp page.
> Run it as .stm (ie a 3 char extension version of .shtml) as this
> interpreter
> is a lot quicker than the ASP one.
> </tip>
> Martin Burns
> xtn 20867
> External tel: 0131 523 0867
> mobile: 0793 151 8480
> 	<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> 
> 
> _______________________________________________________
> unsubscribe+options: http://lists.evolt.org/mailman/listinfo/thelist
> tip harvester: http://lists.evolt.org/harvest/
> email archive: http://lists.evolt.org/archive/
> http://evolt.org/  Workers of the Web, evolt !