[thelist] A Standard Contract for Web Designers
Teachout, Phlete
TeachoutPR at webfld.navy.mil
Wed, 5 Jan 2000 13:03:16 -0500
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
------_=_NextPart_001_01BF57A7.2936E3A2
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
> From: George Dillon [mailto:george.dillon@ukonline.co.uk]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2000 12:10 PM
> To: thelist@lists.evolt.org
> Subject: Re: [thelist] A Standard Contract for Web Designers
>
> Ah, I get it now. Thanks for the quick tutorial! :-)
>
> You're probably right, but I was only really aiming to
> produce one contract that could perhaps be adapted,
> rather than an application to generate every possible
> combination of contract that might be desired. (Or am
> I still missing your point?)
Well, in the "tutorial," the top level "contract" could be downgraded to
"web development contract" or "java programming contract," etc. It's kinda
scalable - especially at this stage. ie. a contract is a contract is a
contract - like roses, ya know!? :)
> Maybe your grander vision could be a BIG PROJECT
> for the more expert members of evolt to embark on?
I think this particular BIG PROJECT requires the input of a lawyer (or
lawyers) at some point. I don't qualify there. Matter of fact, I probably
don't qualify much of anywhere in that sort of project! :)
- fleet -
------_=_NextPart_001_01BF57A7.2936E3A2
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
5.5.2650.12">
<TITLE>RE: [thelist] A Standard Contract for Web Designers</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>> From: George Dillon [<A =
HREF=3D"mailto:george.dillon@ukonline.co.uk">mailto:george.dillon@ukonli=
ne.co.uk</A>]</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2000 12:10 =
PM</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> To: thelist@lists.evolt.org</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Subject: Re: [thelist] A Standard Contract for =
Web Designers</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Ah, I get it now. Thanks for the quick =
tutorial! :-)</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> You're probably right, but I was only really =
aiming to </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> produce one contract that could perhaps be =
adapted, </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> rather than an application to generate every =
possible </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> combination of contract that might be =
desired. (Or am</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> I still missing your point?)</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Well, in the "tutorial," the top level =
"contract" could be downgraded to "web development =
contract" or "java programming contract," etc. =
It's kinda scalable - especially at this stage. ie. a contract is a =
contract is a contract - like roses, ya know!? :) </FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2> </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Maybe your grander vision could be a BIG =
PROJECT </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> for the more expert members of evolt to embark =
on?</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>I think this particular BIG PROJECT requires the =
input of a lawyer (or lawyers) at some point. I don't qualify =
there. Matter of fact, I probably don't qualify much of anywhere =
in that sort of project! :)</FONT></P>
<P> =
=
=
=
=
<FONT SIZE=3D2>- fleet =
-</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01BF57A7.2936E3A2--