[thelist] accessability guidelines - good/bad?

At 01:38 PM 3/20/00 -0600, you wrote:
>         I don't have any illusions that a voluntary effort of any kind will
>ever achieve full accessibility -- perhaps nothing even close. My point is
>that accessibility is one goal -- a highly worthwhile goal -- that must be
>balanced against other values: namely, the right of people to make choices
>for themselves. In my opinion, there are few things -- no matter how
>honorable and praiseworthy they may be -- that take precedence over
>individual liberty -- no matter how foolishly it is exercised. That's why I
>argue for an active, voluntary effort: it encourages accessibility without
>riding roughshod over Constitutionally guaranteed rights (in the U.S., at
>least :).

My apologies. I think we are in agreement on the issues, at least, if not 
on the resolution.


--
Kevin B. O'Brien                TANSTAAFL
kevin@ahuka.cnchost.com
Help fight SPAM. Join CAUCE. http://www.cauce.org/
"Ninety-nine per cent of the people in the world are fools and the
rest of us are in great danger of contagion." --Thornton Wilder