[thelist] are <FONT> tags depreciated?

Fri Jun 30 15:58:07 CDT 2000

according to w3.org, <head> and </head> are optional. but then it goes
on to say that "Every HTML document must have a TITLE element in the
HEAD section." This would make it sound like you are required to have a
<head>. So basically, i'm just as confused as you are. maybe it's a case
of browsers not being as strict as they should be with HTML errors, or
maybe it's actually legal. can anyone else shed some light on the
subject?

#airyk

April Kiskis wrote:

> 
> Speaking of mozilla.org, how come they don't use the   <head> </head> tag?
>