on 7/23/00 9:51 PM, aardvark at roselli at earthlink.net wrote: >> for my arguments why XHTML is not (yet) important. > > now *this* i can agree with... i've been debating on and > off responding to some of the emails where i see people > using XHTML in their code samples and asking "why?"... but > i've refrained... The only reason I can think of is, it would be really nice to be able to pass your XHTML pages to an XML parser so you can alter the page via the DOM - you know on the server, during development. It would certainly make some site maintenance issues easier, and I'd be interested in seeing a CMS that did this. (and no, I'm not coding to XHTML) James.