[thelist] quote from Webmonkey site re: copyrighted images

[Chris Evans]

My question was purely theoretical as to what would be covered by copyright,
and what would entail "beyond recognition" as WebMonkey described it.
Ethically, I'm sure nobody on the evolt list would violate copyright law.

But to summarize the wisdom of the list, Webmonkey is full of beans. Using
an image, even modified beyond recognition, is still in violation.


Chris Evans
chris at fuseware.com
http://www.fuseware.com



-----Original Message-----
From: thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org
[mailto:thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org]On Behalf Of Richard H. Morris
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 5:15 PM
To: thelist at lists.evolt.org
Cc: martin at takingitglobal.org
Subject: RE: [thelist] quote from Webmonkey site re: copyrighted images


Martin Kuplens-Ewart [martin at takingitglobal.org] suggested:

> -----Original Message-----
> If the original artist was smart, they will have embedded a digimarc
> watermark that would most likely have survived even all that.

I didn't think they were that durable.

_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/
Richard. H. Morris, Web Designers Limited
~~ http://www.web-designers.co.uk ~~
"I'd rather have a full bottle in front of me
          than a full frontal lobotomy"
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/



---------------------------------------
For unsubscribe and other options, including
the Tip Harvester and archive of TheList go to:
http://lists.evolt.org Workers of the Web, evolt !