[thelist] Lynx for Win2K?

[R.Livsey]

Wow, thanks for that.

I had never tested cache-22 in lynx and am surprised how well t
performs!
I need to look at some alt tag stuff, but apart from that it looks good!
Better than Netscape 4, which I really should get round to looking at!

Its always the case that you never have time for your own site!

R.Livsey
------------------------------------------
Clothes make the man. Naked people have little or no influence on
society.
------------------------------------------
Lead Programmer for the Tickle Group
Freelance work always welcome
[ PHP | Perl | mySQL | Java ]
w : cache-22.co.uk
e : R.Livsey at cache-22.co.uk
m : +447764 685 701
i : 37530949 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org 
> [mailto:thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org] On Behalf Of Dave Preston
> Sent: 07 November 2001 22:42
> To: thelist at lists.evolt.org
> Subject: Re: [thelist] Lynx for Win2K?
> 
> 
> can't vouch for it since I try to use windows as little as possible...
> 
> http://jim.spath.com/lynx_win32/
> 
> you could also install cygwin which has lynx available...
> 
http://sources.redhat.com/cygwin/

good luck,

-dave


On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 01:52:17PM -0800, Bob Haroche wrote:
> The thread on alt tags got me thinking I'd like to test some of my 
> stuff in lynx.  My Win98 version of the browser doesn't work in Win2K.
> 
> I know there are LOTS of versions out there, but can anyone point me 
> to a stable, binary version for Win2K?
> 
> TIA
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Bob Haroche