> > we're leaning towards having both a Flash and an HTML version of the entire site. This would mean having one version with a static home page as well as HTML navigation. I'm having discussions with someone now who needs SEO work done who's got an all-Flash site that can't be indexed by search engines. There's a decision whether to just go with doing a whole nuther HTML design and present choice of two versions on the splash page, which is the ideal solution, or just sniff for the Flash plugin and go plain vanilla on the HTML. There's a limited budget and there would be quite a difference in the quote. What are the latest numbers on those with and without the Flash plugin?