[thelist] site checks different list?

[Chris]

Although I can see your point. I doubt many people would be that interested
in subscribing to a list that's sole purpose is site checks.

Perhaps there should be some sort of restriction as to when site checks can
be posted, or perhaps your could only get a site check if your pay for it
with a tip or two. Just an idea.

Regards,
Chris.

-----Original Message-----
From: thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org
[mailto:thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org]On Behalf Of David Kutcher
Sent: Monday, 17 June 2002 21:42
To: thelist at lists.evolt.org
Subject: [thelist] site checks different list?


--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
A question to the group and the moderators:

Would it be worthwhile to move "site checks" to their own list?

I think maybe 1/3 of the traffic on this list is site checks... and the rest
is either theoretical arguments or requests for code help.

Now, I frequent the list, and respond to the emails that are either
discussion/arguments or requests for code help, but I never go to look at a
site when someone requests a "site check"

Maybe it would be useful to distinguish this as its own list?

David
--
For unsubscribe and other options, including
the Tip Harvester and archive of thelist go to:
http://lists.evolt.org Workers of the Web, evolt !