The article is not very explicit. It says that they are "disappointed with the results" of their test. Then it says, that MX only works with one Windows screen reader, but it never says how well it works with that one screen reader. Nothing is stated about what the actual results are. Could they be more vague? It's too bad, cause it sounded like an interesting test. -----Original Message----- From: Martin Burns [SMTP:martin at easyweb.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 8:25 AM To: thelist at lists.evolt.org Subject: [thelist] FlashMX and Accessibility - "Could do better" http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/25767.html _______________________________________________ email: martin at easyweb.co.uk PGP ID: 0xA835CCCB martin at members.evolt.org snailmail: 30 Shandon Place tel: +44 (0)774 063 9985 Edinburgh, url: http://www.easyweb.co.uk Scotland -- For unsubscribe and other options, including the Tip Harvester and archive of thelist go to: http://lists.evolt.org Workers of the Web, evolt !