[thelist] FlashMX and Accessibility - "Could do better"

[aardvark]

> From: "Plunkett, Matt" <MPlunkett at MSA.com>
[...]
> It says that they are "disappointed with the results" of their test.
> Then it says, that MX only works with one Windows screen reader, but
> it never says how well it works with that one screen reader.  Nothing
> is stated about what the actual results are.  Could they be more
> vague?
[...]

yeah, i felt the same way, so i went to the RNIB site to see if
perhaps they had a release on it (btw, i know it's a site for the
blind, but could they do a better job of hiding press releases?)...

not a thing there... so there's really no supporting documentation
on any of this, just a Register article without much meat...

too bad...


--
Read the evolt.org case study
Usability: The Site Speaks for Itself
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1904151035/evoltorg
ISBN: 1904151035