[thelist] replace <b> with <strong> (why dont use b tag)]
Mark Howells
webdev at mountain.ch
Wed Jul 31 10:53:09 CDT 2002
>> True, but then having a tag to define the visual appearance is still
>> staying away from the separation of style and structure.
>
> um, maybe i'm missing something, but if there are certain portions of
> structure that have to be styled somehow, how else are you gonna apply the
> style except through some kind of tag? in other words, you *cannot*
> separate style and structure without tags!!
I didn't say that you could. I pointed out that a tag that means "display
this in bold text" has absolutely no relevance to an audio browser, and that
a semantically neutral tag would be more appropriate.
>> In practice, using <b> would be the same as using a tag like <red> --
>> using a tag to define the visual appearance breaks away from the
>> concept of tag for markup and style sheets for style.
>
> in other words, you cannot style without markup
> that's *my* point, and you cannot make it ;o)
> i agree, B and RED and the repulsive SPAN are all the same in this context
<span> isn't in the same set as <b> and the imaginary <red>, as it has no
default styling characteristics without an applied style sheet -- in having
this characteristic, it is ideal for applying styling cues exclusively in
visual browsers.
The use of <span> instead of a semantically correct header tag, to indicate
a structural heading, is where many developers fail in achieving accessible
and structurally correct pages.
>> Sorry, but the concept of forward scanning for sequential audio
>> has me stumped -- how would that work, exactly?
>
> which is why STRONG would be wrong
In this example, that's true.
Regards
Mark Howells
<http://www.mark.ac/evl/>
More information about the thelist
mailing list