From headlines at lists.evolt.org Mon Nov 18 00:11:01 2002
From: headlines at lists.evolt.org (Headlines)
Date: Mon Nov 18 00:11:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] Headlines from evolt.org for 17-NOV-02
Message-ID: <200211180610.gAI6A1q8029552@leo.evolt.org>
evolt.org headlines for 17-NOV-02
Hi evolters!
We have some fresh content on evolt.org today, contributed by our
members. Learn something new or review the perspective of someone
else:
IA/Usability: Courtesy titles and webform design recommendations (Author: siliconglen)
http://www.evolt.org/article/headline/4090/47272/index.html
Courtesy Titles. Their use, misuse and guidelines for flexible
international website design
Authors really appreciate feedback from their peers; you can leave a
comment and rate articles by logging into the evolt.org web site.
Happy reading!
evolt.org
From ken.kogler at curf.edu Mon Nov 18 00:40:00 2002
From: ken.kogler at curf.edu (Ken Kogler)
Date: Mon Nov 18 00:40:00 2002
Subject: [thelist] SSIs not working inside a
In-Reply-To: <020901c28ec7$1dfb74d0$c27ba8c0@D9J77B01>
Message-ID: <000301c28ecd$0ee713e0$5a04810a@maegreatha>
I think your problem is with the include statement itself:
>
Virtual includes are root-relative, meaning you have to start the URI
with a slash, like this:
Or:
Try that. If that doesn't clear it up, please post the text of the error
message and we'll be able to dig a little deeper.
HTH!
--Ken
P.S. Don't forget to trim your replies!
(This goes for everyone...)
From thelist at lists.evolt.org Mon Nov 18 01:14:00 2002
From: thelist at lists.evolt.org (Tip Harvester)
Date: Mon Nov 18 01:14:00 2002
Subject: [thelist] Tip Harvest for the Week of Monday Nov 11, 2002
Message-ID: <200211180601.gAI61ITd029199@leo.evolt.org>
The tip harvest for the Week of Monday Nov 11, 2002 has been added
to the lists.evolt.org site. Get it at:
http://lists.evolt.org/index.cfm/a/harvest/b/show/c/Week-of-Mon-20021111.html
Week at a glance listing at:
http://lists.evolt.org/index.cfm/a/harvest/b/week/c/Week-of-Mon-20021111.html
Search the tips at:
http://lists.evolt.org/index.cfm/a/harvest/b/search/
Harvest Summary
---------------
Number of messages: 558
Number of tips : 12
Tip Authors
-----------
Junglee (1)
kristina (1)
Lachlan Cannon (1)
Liam Delahunty (1)
Michael Mell (1)
pixelmech (1)
Rob.Smith (3)
rudy (1)
Wade Armstrong (1)
Tip Types
---------
Bridges (1)
copyright (1)
debugging (1)
Enhancing Excellent Web Pages Exponentially (1)
form LABEL (1)
javascript (1)
PHP (1)
sql (1)
Visual Studio.NET (1)
Web Design Poem (1)
From jennie at surreal.nu Mon Nov 18 01:39:01 2002
From: jennie at surreal.nu (jennie :D)
Date: Mon Nov 18 01:39:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] protecting files on a website
Message-ID: <000d01c28ed5$bcd8d3a0$6400a8c0@rei>
Hi. :)
I'm wondering how I can prevent visitors from downloading
my .css, .js, etc... files. I've tried .htaccess, but I haven't
been able to get it to work.
Thanks! Any feedback would be greatly appreciated!
--Jennie
From jeff at members.evolt.org Mon Nov 18 01:49:01 2002
From: jeff at members.evolt.org (.jeff)
Date: Mon Nov 18 01:49:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] protecting files on a website
In-Reply-To: <000d01c28ed5$bcd8d3a0$6400a8c0@rei>
Message-ID:
jennie,
><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
> From: jennie :D
>
> I'm wondering how I can prevent visitors from
> downloading my .css, .js, etc... files. I've tried
> .htaccess, but I haven't been able to get it to work.
><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
start off by never putting them online. that'll prevent everyone from
downloading them.
however, since these files are used for styling and scripting, i'm guessing
that's not really going to work for you. you're probably hoping to find a
way to let the browser download it when your site is requested, but want to
keep prying eyes from viewing these files. well, guess what? you can't.
if the browser can see them, then prying eyes can see them in numerous
ways -- browser cache, using the view-source: protocol in the browser
window, using an http command tool, using scripting (like a bookmarklet) to
grab this data from the dom, etc., etc., etc.
no offense, but this is a fruitless journey. give up before you get nasty
blisters on yoru feet for nothing.
.jeff
http://evolt.org/
jeff at members.evolt.org
http://members.evolt.org/jeff/
From Julian.Scarlett at sheffield.gov.uk Mon Nov 18 03:33:01 2002
From: Julian.Scarlett at sheffield.gov.uk (Scarlett Julian (ED))
Date: Mon Nov 18 03:33:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] website security
Message-ID:
Hi all
someone considerably higher up in the food chain here at work has asked me
to provide him with a summary of do's and don'ts for building a secure
website (probably on IIS lol). Does anyone know of any good sites that I can
look at or can anyone write me a brief summary. Your help would be much
appreciated in this one as my knowledge of this area is very sketchy (yes,
I've told him this, yes, I still have to do it) ;-)
tia
Julian
Julian Scarlett
Education Web Officer
Information Systems
Education Directorate
Sheffield City Council
The information in this email is confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other than the addressee. If you are not the addressee, please tell us by using the reply facility in your email software as soon as possible. Sheffield City Council cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message as it has been transmitted over a public network. If you suspect that the message may have been intercepted or amended please tell us as soon as possible.
From mailing.lists at creed.co.uk Mon Nov 18 03:53:00 2002
From: mailing.lists at creed.co.uk (Andy Warwick)
Date: Mon Nov 18 03:53:00 2002
Subject: [thelist] website security
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID: <7E66E491-FADB-11D6-9C43-0050E4805149@creed.co.uk>
On Monday, November 18, 2002, at 09:34 AM, Scarlett Julian (ED) wrote:
> someone considerably higher up in the food chain here at work has
> asked me
> to provide him with a summary of do's and don'ts for building a secure
> website (probably on IIS lol).
Julian
A very good starting point is the 98 page PDF available at
It covers all the things that you should be thinking about.
HTH
(security & IIS..... must resist....)
--
Andy Warwick
Creed New Media Design, Nottingham, UK
[t] +44 (0)115 8476867
[w]
From codebitch at macedition.com Mon Nov 18 04:47:01 2002
From: codebitch at macedition.com (CodeBitch)
Date: Mon Nov 18 04:47:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] New technique for hiding CSS from OmniWeb
Message-ID:
Dear theListers,
I know I haven't been particularly active on this list for some time, and
apologies in advance to those who have already seen this announcement on
CSS-Discuss.
I have discovered a hack for hiding CSS stylesheets from OmniWeb. Just use
media="Screen" or media="All" instead of media="screen" or media="all".
(Detailed discussion of validity and case sensitivity in the article at the
URL below.)
Test page: http://www.macedition.com/cb/testers/owhide.html
Companion article: http://www.macedition.com/cb/cb_20021118.php
Warm regards,
CodeBitch
Encoded as a tip:
OmniWeb has some important gaps in its CSS support. If you have a lot of Mac
OS X-using readers, you might want to go to the bother of passing different
styles to OmniWeb than to other CSS-supporting browsers. To hide a CSS
stylesheet from OmniWeb, simply use media="Screen" or media="All" instead of
media="screen" or media="all".
--
CodeBitch at MacEdition
http://www.macedition.com/cb/
Cracking the whip on your naughty HTML since 2000
From peter at duo.be Mon Nov 18 05:49:01 2002
From: peter at duo.be (Peter Duchateau)
Date: Mon Nov 18 05:49:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] [ASP] option explicit
Message-ID:
Do you guys use "option explicit" in you ASP files ?
Why do/don't you use it ?
From cd-ml at aardvark.net.au Mon Nov 18 06:25:01 2002
From: cd-ml at aardvark.net.au (Craig)
Date: Mon Nov 18 06:25:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] Removing a link with JavaScript.
Message-ID: <003c01c28efd$6d81d310$3e76ddcb@FX>
Hi,
Is it possible with JavaScript to un-link a link?
If I had the following:
<.a href="test.htm" name="lnkTest">Test<./a>
Using JS, how do I un-link it so Test is not an active link when hovered over?
I've tried the following script but it just changes the href value:
<.script language="javascript">
document.links[0].href="";
<./script>
Is it possible?
Thanks,
Craig.
From chris at webbtech.co.uk Mon Nov 18 06:42:00 2002
From: chris at webbtech.co.uk (Chris Marsh)
Date: Mon Nov 18 06:42:00 2002
Subject: [thelist] Removing a link with JavaScript.
In-Reply-To: <003c01c28efd$6d81d310$3e76ddcb@FX>
Message-ID: <000401c28efe$979b4d10$0400a8c0@webbtech.co.uk>
Craig
> Is it possible with JavaScript to un-link a link?
>
> If I had the following:
> <.a href="test.htm" name="lnkTest">Test<./a>
> Using JS, how do I un-link it so Test is not an active link
> when hovered over?
Why would you want to hardcode a link that only actually links when the
keyboard is used to navigate? I suspect you're actually trying to
achieve something else that can probably be done using a different
method...
> I've tried the following script but it just changes the href value:
> <.script language="javascript">
> document.links[0].href="";
> <./script>
>
> Is it possible?
I'm pretty sure that if you include onclick='return false;' in the
anchor tag you will achieve what you appear to want. Why not give us
some context?
Regards
Chris Marsh
From persist1 at io.com Mon Nov 18 07:28:01 2002
From: persist1 at io.com (Ben Henick)
Date: Mon Nov 18 07:28:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] Removing a link with JavaScript.
In-Reply-To: <000401c28efe$979b4d10$0400a8c0@webbtech.co.uk>
Message-ID:
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Chris Marsh wrote:
> Why would you want to hardcode a link that only actually links when the
> keyboard is used to navigate? I suspect you're actually trying to
> achieve something else that can probably be done using a different
> method...
...
> >
> > Is it possible?
>
> I'm pretty sure that if you include onclick='return false;' in the
> anchor tag you will achieve what you appear to want. Why not give us
> some context?
As regards the desired solution...
You can manipulate the markup itself by changing its outerHTML property,
or the innerHTML property of its parent element. That will only work on
IE, though.
Or you can accomplish the same thing with compliant code, which requires a
slightly more circuitous approach if the link you need to change is buried
in the document stucture.
I personally think you might want to consider the alternative of just
using CSS to style that particular link so that it's indistinguishable
from normal copy (which means fiddling with the pointer that results
onmouseover as well). Then using JavaScript, go ahead and put another
style declaration behind the link's onfocus event, meaning that if a
keyboard users tabs to it, it will behave like a link more-or-less.
However, I have to agree that you might want to take a closer look at the
UI implementation... the objective risks breaking consistency in a
potentially nasty way, an outcome to be avoided.
--
Ben Henick
Web Author At-Large Associate Editor
http://www.io.com/persist1/ http://www.digital-web.com/
persist1 at io.com bmh at digital-web.com
--
"Are you pondering what I'm pondering, Pinky?"
"I think so, Brain, but... (snort) no, no, it's too stupid."
"We will disguise ourselves as a cow."
"Oh!" (giggles) "That was it exactly!"
From Ron.Luther at hp.com Mon Nov 18 07:48:00 2002
From: Ron.Luther at hp.com (Luther, Ron)
Date: Mon Nov 18 07:48:00 2002
Subject: [thelist] [ASP] option explicit
Message-ID: <8958135993102D479F1CA2351F370A0602F4BBBA@cceexc17.americas.cpqcorp.net>
Hi Peter,
I usually do. It's a very fast and easy way to find errors
where you have incorrectly spelled a variable name.
Depending on the situation and the size of the code, you
may otherwise spend hours trying to trace through the logic
to see why the page isn't working the way you expected it to.
RonL.
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Duchateau [mailto:peter at duo.be]
Do you guys use "option explicit" in you ASP files ?
Why do/don't you use it ?
From rick at kitty5.com Mon Nov 18 07:54:00 2002
From: rick at kitty5.com (Rick [Kitty5])
Date: Mon Nov 18 07:54:00 2002
Subject: [thelist] [ASP] option explicit
References:
Message-ID: <007c01c28f09$afb186c0$0100a8c0@sigma>
Peter Duchateau wrote:
> Do you guys use "option explicit" in you ASP files ?
>
> Why do/don't you use it ?
Using option explicit is vital, as it forces you to declare all your
variables before use, aside from any possible performance gains it makes
code much simpler to debug.
Rick
Kitty5 NewMedia http://Kitty5.co.uk
POV-Ray News & Resources http://Povray.co.uk
TEL : +44 (01270) 501101 - FAX : +44 (01270) 251105 - ICQ : 15776037
PGP Public Key
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x231E1CEA
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.419 / Virus Database: 235 - Release Date: 13/11/2002
From dan at danromanchik.com Mon Nov 18 09:03:01 2002
From: dan at danromanchik.com (Dan Romanchik)
Date: Mon Nov 18 09:03:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] SSIs not working inside a
References: <000301c28ecd$0ee713e0$5a04810a@maegreatha>
Message-ID: <025201c28f13$7eb83ff0$c27ba8c0@D9J77B01>
I tried that, too. I used the statement:
with the same results. The error message is the generic:
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Dan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ken Kogler"
To:
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 1:38 AM
Subject: RE: [thelist] SSIs not working inside a
> I think your problem is with the include statement itself:
>
> >
>
> Virtual includes are root-relative, meaning you have to start the URI
> with a slash, like this:
>
>
>
> Or:
>
>
>
> Try that. If that doesn't clear it up, please post the text of the error
> message and we'll be able to dig a little deeper.
>
> HTH!
> --Ken
>
> P.S. Don't forget to trim your replies!
> (This goes for everyone...)
>
> --
> * * Please support the community that supports you. * *
> http://evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>
> For unsubscribe and other options, including the Tip Harvester
> and archives of thelist go to: http://lists.evolt.org
> Workers of the Web, evolt !
>
From pvandijck at lds.com Mon Nov 18 09:09:01 2002
From: pvandijck at lds.com (Peter VanDijck)
Date: Mon Nov 18 09:09:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] mod_gzip
References: <000901c28cf0$406fe5b0$0a00a8c0@Aleem>
Message-ID: <3DD90256.CE1168FB@lds.com>
Hi all,
I was looking for ways to reduce my bandwidth and someone suggested
mod-gzip. (It compresses pages before they are sent to the browser - the
browser then decompresses them.) Bandwidth reductions of 50% seem
common, but good documentation seems really hard to find. My questions:
- My pages get generated by PHP using mod_rewrite. Is that a problem?
- How hard is it to set up for someone with limited sysadmin skills but
complete access to a virtual server? What's the average amount of
tinkering time needed to get it to work ok?
- Any issues I should be aware of?
- Good documentation?
Cheers,
Peter
From Amazon.Paulo at Amazoniacelular.com.br Mon Nov 18 09:16:01 2002
From: Amazon.Paulo at Amazoniacelular.com.br (Amazon Paulo)
Date: Mon Nov 18 09:16:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] [ASP] option explicit
Message-ID: <8B81473BB9E8D4118E6B0008C7B98AFB0BC568ED@belsc.amazoniacelular.com.br>
>Do you guys use "option explicit" in you ASP files ?
Yes, I always do.
>Why do/don't you use it ?
I can't see any reason not to use. Without the Option Explicit clause, your
script will be much more sucetible to logical erros, and you'll take much
longer to solve them. I think it should not be optional.
Paulo Guedes
From Josh.S.Feingold at irs.gov Mon Nov 18 09:16:09 2002
From: Josh.S.Feingold at irs.gov (Feingold Josh S)
Date: Mon Nov 18 09:16:09 2002
Subject: [thelist] SSIs not working inside a
Message-ID: <40BE5618BBFAD6119DAC0004ACE530C686973A@chm0010mb01.atsc.irs.gov>
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
> with the same results. The error message is the generic:
> [an error occurred while processing this directive]
Two questions:
1) Have you ever successfully used SSI on this server?
2) Try using a file directive:
Josh
http://www.efeingold.com
From Josh.S.Feingold at irs.gov Mon Nov 18 09:21:01 2002
From: Josh.S.Feingold at irs.gov (Feingold Josh S)
Date: Mon Nov 18 09:21:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] [ASP] option explicit
Message-ID: <40BE5618BBFAD6119DAC0004ACE530C686973B@chm0010mb01.atsc.irs.gov>
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
>Do you guys use "option explicit" in you ASP files ?
Usually not.
>Why do/don't you use it ?
I find that most of my ASP applications are not complicated enough to
require option explicit. I have yet to accidentally misuse a variable due
to my lack of declaration, which seems to be the main reason to do use
option explicit. However, if I create an application which calls other
pages from within that page or some other place where variables can be
easily confused I use option explicit.
Josh
http://www.efeingold.com
From rick at kitty5.com Mon Nov 18 09:22:00 2002
From: rick at kitty5.com (Rick [Kitty5])
Date: Mon Nov 18 09:22:00 2002
Subject: [thelist] Javascript Querystring?
Message-ID: <004501c28f15$fabe0ec0$0100a8c0@sigma>
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Is it possible to use some javascript to make all links on a page contain a querystring variable?
eg get javascript to add '?foo=fee' to all links
Rick
Kitty5 NewMedia http://Kitty5.co.uk
POV-Ray News & Resources http://Povray.co.uk
TEL : +44 (01270) 501101 - FAX : +44 (01270) 251105 - ICQ : 15776037
PGP Public Key
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x231E1CEA
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.419 / Virus Database: 235 - Release Date: 13/11/2002
--
From p+evolt at redbrick.dcu.ie Mon Nov 18 09:23:00 2002
From: p+evolt at redbrick.dcu.ie (Kevin)
Date: Mon Nov 18 09:23:00 2002
Subject: [thelist] website security
In-Reply-To: ; from Julian.Scarlett@sheffield.gov.uk on Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 09:34:35AM -0000
References:
Message-ID: <20021118152238.A27470@prodigy.Redbrick.DCU.IE>
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 09:34:35AM -0000, Scarlett Julian (ED) wrote:
> Hi all
>
> someone considerably higher up in the food chain here at work has asked me
> to provide him with a summary of do's and don'ts for building a secure
> website (probably on IIS lol). Does anyone know of any good sites that I can
> look at or can anyone write me a brief summary.
Do: go to monster.com and post up looking for a security professional.
Don't: Hire someone who doesn't know anything.
(:
There's a very useful collection of links at this site,
under 'securing OSs'
http://heap.nologin.net/
- Kevin
From kyle.murphy at tempschedulingsystem.com Mon Nov 18 09:29:00 2002
From: kyle.murphy at tempschedulingsystem.com (Kyle Murphy)
Date: Mon Nov 18 09:29:00 2002
Subject: [thelist] What shall we do with the W3C DOM - part 2
In-Reply-To: <3DD5F410.2823.45160E@localhost>
Message-ID: <000801c28f17$657aed90$1f01000a@tempschedulingsystem.com>
Try setting your resolution above 800x600.....do people still use
800x600...and, if so, why?
Kyle Murphy
Web Software Engineer
Clearview Staffing Software
972.381.9777 ext. 22
-----Original Message-----
From: thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org
[mailto:thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org] On Behalf Of Mark Groen
Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2002 9:30 AM
To: thelist at lists.evolt.org
Subject: Re: [thelist] What shall we do with the W3C DOM - part 2
On November 16, 2002 at 13:51, it was wrote:
> >THis is what we shall do with the DOM:
> >http://www.microbians.com/
> >From the drop down menu - select 'Draw across windows'
> Yes, that's a nice example. It doesn't strictly require the W3C DOM,
> though, some good DHTML support is enough.
You also have to be viewing at greater than 800x600 eh.
> But it is the kind of application I'm talking about.
The drag thingee is kinda cool, I can see it being used to drag items
into
a shopping cart, creating schedules etc. hmmm...
Regards,
Mark Groen
MG Web Services
Web Site Hosting and Development
www.markgroen.com
mark at markgroen.com
604-780-6917
--
* * Please support the community that supports you. * *
http://evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
For unsubscribe and other options, including the Tip Harvester
and archives of thelist go to: http://lists.evolt.org
Workers of the Web, evolt !
From mattmacleod12 at yahoo.co.uk Mon Nov 18 09:44:01 2002
From: mattmacleod12 at yahoo.co.uk (Matt MacLeod)
Date: Mon Nov 18 09:44:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] Mac Users - site check please!!!
Message-ID: <5.1.1.6.0.20021118154807.00a12140@pop.mail.yahoo.co.uk>
Hi,
I've been given about half an hour to tweak the layout for
www.bigbarn.co.uk/finefood/ and I need to check it in IE5/Mac.
I'd appreciate it if anybody could send me a screenshot taken on a Mac so I
can see how it looks.
Cheers Matt
From carole at pixeltable.com Mon Nov 18 09:48:01 2002
From: carole at pixeltable.com (carole guevin)
Date: Mon Nov 18 09:48:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] What shall we do with the W3C DOM - part 2
In-Reply-To: <000801c28f17$657aed90$1f01000a@tempschedulingsystem.com>
Message-ID:
hi Kyle,
:....do people still use 800x600...and, if so, why?
yes... first it's a good usability issue to still fit corp sites on
800x600 - think Unix network using Novell who endorsed Netscape 3 + 4 eons
ago... these companies are NOT ready to upgrade.
also - depending on your audience stats. for ex. people who visit netdiver -
90% + use high screen res BUT they, like I do, surf with multiple windows
opened. Meaning - my browsers windows are roughly sized around 800x600 so I
can view many sites at the same time.
there are other considerations as well (Mac users for one).
hth.
.c
..communication design + webdev + http://pixeltable.com
...new media culture_magazine + design portal + http://netdiver.net
From mark at markgroen.com Mon Nov 18 09:54:00 2002
From: mark at markgroen.com (Mark Groen)
Date: Mon Nov 18 09:54:00 2002
Subject: [thelist] What shall we do with the W3C DOM - part 2
In-Reply-To: <000801c28f17$657aed90$1f01000a@tempschedulingsystem.com>
References: <3DD5F410.2823.45160E@localhost>
Message-ID: <3DD89C58.6482.8B81FC@localhost>
On November 18, 2002 at 9:30, Kyle Murphy wrote:
> Try setting your resolution above 800x600.....do people still use
> 800x600...and, if so, why?
I'm using 17" monitors and higher resolutions make it more difficult to
read text. Don't have time right now to actually dig up the stats, but IIRC
1024 x 768 is not the most common setting among the general
population.
Regards,
Mark Groen
MG Web Services
Web Site Hosting and Development
www.markgroen.com
mark at markgroen.com
604-780-6917
From mspiegler at lightbulbpress.com Mon Nov 18 09:58:01 2002
From: mspiegler at lightbulbpress.com (matt s.)
Date: Mon Nov 18 09:58:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] Mac Users - site check please!!!
References: <5.1.1.6.0.20021118154807.00a12140@pop.mail.yahoo.co.uk>
Message-ID: <3DD90DD6.9C4F1C77@lightbulbpress.com>
--
Here's a couple of screen shots. Mac OS 9.2, IE 5.1.5. Hope that helps...
.matt
Matt MacLeod wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been given about half an hour to tweak the layout for
> www.bigbarn.co.uk/finefood/ and I need to check it in IE5/Mac.
>
> I'd appreciate it if anybody could send me a screenshot taken on a Mac so I
> can see how it looks.
>
> Cheers Matt
>
> --
> * * Please support the community that supports you. * *
> http://evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>
> For unsubscribe and other options, including the Tip Harvester
> and archives of thelist go to: http://lists.evolt.org
> Workers of the Web, evolt !
--
Content-description: Unknown Document
[ finefood_mac_ie5.jpg was deleted, please don't send attachments with your message. ]
--
Content-description: Unknown Document
[ finefood2_mac_ie5.jpg was deleted, please don't send attachments with your message. ]
From tracyh at mid.org Mon Nov 18 10:01:06 2002
From: tracyh at mid.org (TRACY HERBECK)
Date: Mon Nov 18 10:01:06 2002
Subject: [thelist] Re: Tips on Finding Freelance Projects
Message-ID: <02Nov18.080017pst.116165@firewall.mid.org>
Message: 4
CC: "Brian W. Reaves"
Hi Brian,
When I was doing freelance work, I found work pretty easily on
www.craigslist.org. I just posted my resume, skill set and a list of
URLs from previous work. The first time I posted, I receive a reply
within 30 minutes. Times are a little tougher now, perhaps.
Good luck....
Tracy
On 11/15/02 7:49 AM, "thelist-request at lists.evolt.org"
wrote:
> Just wondering what has been successful for other freelancers out
there as
> they look for projects? The development end of this business does not
seem
> to be the difficult part. It's the sales end that I am inefficient at
(Cold
> Calling). Anyone care to share a few trade secrets on what works for
you
> when your friends and family leads dry up?
>
> TIA,
> Brian
From mspiegler at lightbulbpress.com Mon Nov 18 10:02:01 2002
From: mspiegler at lightbulbpress.com (matt s.)
Date: Mon Nov 18 10:02:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] Mac Users - site check please!!!
References: <5.1.1.6.0.20021118154807.00a12140@pop.mail.yahoo.co.uk>
<3DD90DD6.9C4F1C77@lightbulbpress.com>
Message-ID: <3DD90EDB.B5E20896@lightbulbpress.com>
woops. sorry, meant to send this to Matt MacLeod, not the list.
.matt
"matt s." wrote:
> --
> Here's a couple of screen shots. Mac OS 9.2, IE 5.1.5. Hope that helps...
>
> .matt
>
> Matt MacLeod wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've been given about half an hour to tweak the layout for
> > www.bigbarn.co.uk/finefood/ and I need to check it in IE5/Mac.
> >
> > I'd appreciate it if anybody could send me a screenshot taken on a Mac so I
> > can see how it looks.
> >
> > Cheers Matt
> >
> > --
> > * * Please support the community that supports you. * *
> > http://evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
> >
> > For unsubscribe and other options, including the Tip Harvester
> > and archives of thelist go to: http://lists.evolt.org
> > Workers of the Web, evolt !
> --
> Content-description: Unknown Document
>
> [ finefood_mac_ie5.jpg was deleted, please don't send attachments with your message. ]
> --
> Content-description: Unknown Document
>
> [ finefood2_mac_ie5.jpg was deleted, please don't send attachments with your message. ]
> --
> * * Please support the community that supports you. * *
> http://evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>
> For unsubscribe and other options, including the Tip Harvester
> and archives of thelist go to: http://lists.evolt.org
> Workers of the Web, evolt !
From mattmacleod12 at yahoo.co.uk Mon Nov 18 10:16:01 2002
From: mattmacleod12 at yahoo.co.uk (Matt MacLeod)
Date: Mon Nov 18 10:16:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] Mac Users - site check please!!!
In-Reply-To: <5.1.1.6.0.20021118154807.00a12140@pop.mail.yahoo.co.uk>
Message-ID: <5.1.1.6.0.20021118162124.00a13290@pop.mail.yahoo.co.uk>
Thanks guys!!!
At 15:49 18/11/02 +0000, you wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I've been given about half an hour to tweak the layout for
>www.bigbarn.co.uk/finefood/ and I need to check it in IE5/Mac.
>
>I'd appreciate it if anybody could send me a screenshot taken on a Mac so I
>can see how it looks.
>
>Cheers Matt
>
>--
>* * Please support the community that supports you. * *
>http://evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>
>For unsubscribe and other options, including the Tip Harvester and
>archives of thelist go to: http://lists.evolt.org Workers of the Web, evolt !
From evolt at marsorange.com Mon Nov 18 10:29:01 2002
From: evolt at marsorange.com (MarsHall)
Date: Mon Nov 18 10:29:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] mod_gzip
In-Reply-To: <3DD90256.CE1168FB@lds.com>
Message-ID:
Peter...
When mod_gzip is installed and enabled, the HTTP server will send the
content encoded with gzip compression ONLY IF the requesting user-agent
has gzip listed in it's "Accept-Encoding" header. Otherwise, the
connection will proceed without compression. Most modern browsers do
support gzip.
AFAIK, the module works fine with PHP. It seems like output buffering
in PHP would be a good practice if your expecting the pages to be
gzipped on-the-fly...
You need to understand how to install new Apache modules, if mod_gzip
is not already installed, and edit the httpd.conf file in order to make
it work (see doc links below). If you only have user-level access to a
virtual server, this may be a problem... modules must be installed by
root.
The drawbacks are:
--- processing overhead --- which is minor in most cases and can be
completely circumvented by pre-gziping files, so that the server just
sends the compressed file instead of compressing on-the-fly. This
technique would only work for static files [i.e. not PHP], though.
--- proxy/cache issues --- Apparently, some proxies and caches (that
read actual HTML content such as meta-tags) do not play well with
gzip-compressed HTTP content. I am left wondering if those devices
would munge the page, drop the connection or throw an error?
For unofficial documentation, see:
http://www.schroepl.net/projekte/mod_gzip/
http://www.darkmere.gen.nz/2000/1105.html
Mars :)
From stevejenkins444 at hotmail.com Mon Nov 18 10:36:01 2002
From: stevejenkins444 at hotmail.com (Steve Jenkins)
Date: Mon Nov 18 10:36:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] MediaSurface Contract (UK, South East)
Message-ID:
Hi,
I work for a SE England agency. We have a three-four month MediaSurface
contract coming up shortly, and are looking for contractors to assist us
service this contract. Anyone out there possibly interested?
If you have such experience, do please email me your CV/details detailing
your MediaSurface experience, and ideally an indication of rate. No agencies
please.
Regards, Steve.
From headlemur at clearskymail.com Mon Nov 18 10:39:00 2002
From: headlemur at clearskymail.com (the head lemur)
Date: Mon Nov 18 10:39:00 2002
Subject: [thelist] What shall we do with the W3C DOM - part 2
References: <000801c28f17$657aed90$1f01000a@tempschedulingsystem.com>
Message-ID: <004501c28f21$960fb620$0200a8c0@clearskybroadband.com>
> Try setting your resolution above 800x600.....do people still use
> 800x600...and, if so, why?
1. Default.
In a lot of cases programs and computer folks define best viewed at 800x600
Most business programs use this as the default size.
Most video cards sold presently are defaulted at this.
Very little furniture is built to establish the 16" to 20" viewing distance
that ergonomic literature(out of date) specifies as a 'good distance'.
Cubical manufactures do not think about the computer as the primary
information/work tool. (this is getting better, but the cost in relation to
the benefit usually has the button sorters stroking out)
2. Monitor size. Bigger monitors require more space. Folks move them farther
back on their desks. At higher resolution the images become unreadable.
3. Lack of information regarding display properties. Yes you can use large
icons on windows, but how many folks know that? Yes you can change the
colors, fonts, font sizes, and focus colors, but how many folks know that or
are allowed to make these changes?
4. Cost. Most major brand manfactured computers in service have either
shared video memory or 8 MB of video memory. At higher resolutions this
impacts performance,(screen refreshes, screen drawing, display color depth,)
At higher resolutions, to mitigate this performance hit, the video card
palatte will degrade from 32 to 24 to 16 bit to 256 colors.
5. Vision difficulties. Folks who wear glasses, may or may not use them when
working on a computer. This relates back to the viewing distance between the
operator and the monitor. Color blindness is also a factor, as if you cannot
see them, 32bit color is not an enhancement.
(I wear bifocal glasses for driving and reading, but they sit on the counter
when I am on the keyboard)
6. Productivity Impact. There are very few compelling arguments for screen
refreshing justifying an investment in a video card that will run quake3,
but because of the system bus, ram, harddrive speed, etc. really providing
any sort of productivity increase.
7. Folks are happy at 800x600.
This puts the ball back in the court of the designer/developer.
When ordering 'reading or computer eyeglasses measure the distance you
actually are from the monitor. Eyeglass companies will build them for
16"-20" which may not be correct and you will just be pouring money down a
rathole.
Have somebody measure the distance you Actually sit from the screen.
the head lemur
News: http://www.lemurzone.com/news/
Interviews: http://www.lemurzone.com/pixelview/
Standards: http://webstandards.org
Community: http://www.evolt.org
From r937 at interlog.com Mon Nov 18 10:45:00 2002
From: r937 at interlog.com (rudy)
Date: Mon Nov 18 10:45:00 2002
Subject: [thelist] What shall we do with the W3C DOM - part 2
References: <000801c28f17$657aed90$1f01000a@tempschedulingsystem.com>
Message-ID: <005501c28f21$c6eabb00$1b3c6718@r9373j4yqbe8dy>
> Try setting your resolution above 800x600...
hey, i even know how (many people don't)
one conclusion, developed over many years of web surfin and searchin,
is that sites which require you to change a setting invariably disappoint
exceptions include the avant-garde, the experimental, and the wacky
dragging stuff between windows is experimental, right? (yes, i looked --
ordinarily i would have bailed within two or three seconds of arrival)
still, they shoulda explained that, and above the 640 fold, so to speak
everyone loves the wacky, but if the changes offend (e.g. xupiter, gator),
one seldom goes back, and ends up avoiding the entire genre
that leaves the avant-garde
i realise wars have been fought over less, but i personally distinguish the
experimental from the avant-garde based on whether the boundaries being
tested are technological or artistic
yeah, yeah, i know it's not an either-or classification, so sue me
i have yet to see an avant-garde site that benefitted from changing a
setting
i love flash, by the way, despite that so many avant-garde sites use it
> do people still use 800x600...and, if so, why?
yes ... because!
i also wear my hair short and have no body piercings
;o)
From ben_dyer at imaginuity.com Mon Nov 18 10:51:01 2002
From: ben_dyer at imaginuity.com (Ben Dyer)
Date: Mon Nov 18 10:51:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] ColdFusion MX, IIS 5 and Custom Errors
Message-ID: <5.1.1.6.0.20021118104120.01911380@mail.imaginuity.com>
I have a site that is running ColdFusion MX and IIS 5. I want IIS to
handle the 404 errors for .cfm files, not CFMX. Under CF5, this was easily
solved under IIS Manager by setting "Check that File Exists" to
true. ColdFusion MX does not appear to honor this IIS setting, as CFMX
always processes errors for .cfm files regardless of that setting.
Is there any way to force IIS to check for the existence of files, not
CFMX? I've Googled and trawled Macromedia's site and message boards and I
can't find anything. Any ideas?
--Ben
From jacques_capesius at cnt.com Mon Nov 18 10:53:00 2002
From: jacques_capesius at cnt.com (Jacques Capesius)
Date: Mon Nov 18 10:53:00 2002
Subject: [thelist] [ASP] option explicit
Message-ID: <6561B23FEAA18F45AE6A667DBE02C7671FC73A@esply05>
Do you guys use "option explicit" in you ASP files ?
I always do it, unless I forget ;)
Why do/don't you use it ?
I use option explicit with the express purpose of making the ASP code less
forgiving. Since option explicit forces me to dim all of my variables, it
holds me to what I personally think is better programming practice.
From roselli at earthlink.net Mon Nov 18 10:53:07 2002
From: roselli at earthlink.net (aardvark)
Date: Mon Nov 18 10:53:07 2002
Subject: [thelist] What shall we do with the W3C DOM - part 2
In-Reply-To: <000801c28f17$657aed90$1f01000a@tempschedulingsystem.com>
References: <3DD5F410.2823.45160E@localhost>
Message-ID: <200211181652.gAIGqpSL023388@leo.evolt.org>
> From: "Kyle Murphy"
>
> Try setting your resolution above 800x600.....do people still use
> 800x600...and, if so, why?
- yes...
- because they want to...
let's not forget, not everyone has the same phat system as we all
do... believe it or not, i've been to many libraries and even corporate
environments that still run at 640x480, partly because they have to,
partly because some users want it (people over 40 do surf, after all,
and they don't always have great vision, or control over their
computer environment)...
of course, that question shouldn't even require an answer here,
since you have the ability to find it for yourself, and for your very
own audience, even:
Real-World Browser Size Stats, Part I
http://evolt.org/article/list/17/2295/
--
Read the evolt.org case study
Usability: The Site Speaks for Itself
http://amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1904151035/evoltorg02-20
ISBN: 1904151035
From roselli at earthlink.net Mon Nov 18 10:53:30 2002
From: roselli at earthlink.net (aardvark)
Date: Mon Nov 18 10:53:30 2002
Subject: [thelist] SSIs not working inside a
In-Reply-To: <40BE5618BBFAD6119DAC0004ACE530C686973A@chm0010mb01.atsc.irs.gov>
Message-ID: <200211181652.gAIGqvSL023394@leo.evolt.org>
woo hoo! mail's almost back up, only 632 messages behind...
> From: Feingold Josh S
>
> 1) Have you ever successfully used SSI on this server?
> 2) Try using a file directive:
see if this helps any (just basic documentation):
Including Files in ASP
http://evolt.org/article/list/17/1344/
--
Read the evolt.org case study
Usability: The Site Speaks for Itself
http://amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1904151035/evoltorg02-20
ISBN: 1904151035
From wade_lists at runstrong.com Mon Nov 18 10:57:01 2002
From: wade_lists at runstrong.com (Wade Armstrong)
Date: Mon Nov 18 10:57:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] [ASP] option explicit
In-Reply-To: <40BE5618BBFAD6119DAC0004ACE530C686973B@chm0010mb01.atsc.irs.gov>
Message-ID:
on 11/18/02 7:16 AM, Feingold Josh S at Josh.S.Feingold at irs.gov wrote:
>> Do you guys use "option explicit" in you ASP files ?
>
> Usually not.
>
>> Why do/don't you use it ?
>
> I find that most of my ASP applications are not complicated enough to
> require option explicit.
In contrast, I find that it helps with even the simplest scripts. When I
fat-finger a variable name, for instance, strTxet when I mean strText,
rather than having my brand-new misspelled variable have the value of "",
which then takes some tracing within the code to fix, I have the line and
character number of my typo in an error message.
In large applications, you should be encapsulating everything in Functions
and Subs and Objects, making almost all of your variables private rather
than public. You shouldn't have that much trouble re-using variable names;
rather, your benefit here is from the faster execution you get with Option
Explicit.
Wade
From Craig.Saila at bgminteractive.com Mon Nov 18 10:57:12 2002
From: Craig.Saila at bgminteractive.com (Saila, Craig)
Date: Mon Nov 18 10:57:12 2002
Subject: [thelist] SSIs not working inside a
Message-ID: <523ED78FF1F87A44A40907C74F83CBC2057C528A@mail.bgm.globeinteractive.com>
> I tried that, too. I used the statement:
>
>
You may want to add a space before the closing of the SSI:
And just to confirm what others have said, the CSS template wouldn't
cause this problem (I use SSI/XSSI extensively on my site, which uses
[surprise!] that template).
--
Cheers,
Craig Saila
------------------------------------------
craig at saila.com : http://www.saila.com/
------------------------------------------
From dan at danromanchik.com Mon Nov 18 11:02:01 2002
From: dan at danromanchik.com (Dan Romanchik)
Date: Mon Nov 18 11:02:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] SSIs not working inside a
References: <523ED78FF1F87A44A40907C74F83CBC2057C528A@mail.bgm.globeinteractive.com>
Message-ID: <02c901c28f24$2c9e4640$c27ba8c0@D9J77B01>
Geez, I hate to admit this....
The problem was that I forgot to upload the file to be included. D'oh!
Sorry for the dumb question,
Dan
p.s. Thanks again for the great templates, Craig.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Saila, Craig"
To:
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 11:56 AM
Subject: RE: [thelist] SSIs not working inside a
> > I tried that, too. I used the statement:
> >
> >
>
> You may want to add a space before the closing of the SSI:
>
>
> And just to confirm what others have said, the CSS template wouldn't
> cause this problem (I use SSI/XSSI extensively on my site, which uses
> [surprise!] that template).
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> Craig Saila
> ------------------------------------------
> craig at saila.com : http://www.saila.com/
> ------------------------------------------
> --
> * * Please support the community that supports you. * *
> http://evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>
> For unsubscribe and other options, including the Tip Harvester
> and archives of thelist go to: http://lists.evolt.org
> Workers of the Web, evolt !
>
From ray at camdenfamily.com Mon Nov 18 11:09:00 2002
From: ray at camdenfamily.com (Raymond Camden)
Date: Mon Nov 18 11:09:00 2002
Subject: [thelist] ColdFusion MX, IIS 5 and Custom Errors
In-Reply-To: <5.1.1.6.0.20021118104120.01911380@mail.imaginuity.com>
Message-ID: <003b01c28f25$24d07b80$6461a8c0@vader>
Ben - I'm not seeing this. Is this a multi-homed server? You may need to
do the 'check that file exists' thing on each of the sites.
=======================================================================
Raymond Camden, ColdFusion Jedi Master for Hire
Email : ray at camdenfamily.com
WWW : www.camdenfamily.com/morpheus
Yahoo IM : morpheus
"My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda
> -----Original Message-----
> From: thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org
> [mailto:thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org] On Behalf Of Ben Dyer
> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 11:50 AM
> To: thelist at lists.evolt.org
> Subject: [thelist] ColdFusion MX, IIS 5 and Custom Errors
>
>
> I have a site that is running ColdFusion MX and IIS 5. I want IIS to
> handle the 404 errors for .cfm files, not CFMX. Under CF5,
> this was easily
> solved under IIS Manager by setting "Check that File Exists" to
> true. ColdFusion MX does not appear to honor this IIS
> setting, as CFMX
> always processes errors for .cfm files regardless of that setting.
>
> Is there any way to force IIS to check for the existence of files, not
> CFMX? I've Googled and trawled Macromedia's site and message
> boards and I
> can't find anything. Any ideas?
>
> --Ben
>
> --
> * * Please support the community that supports you. * *
> http://evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>
> For unsubscribe and other options, including the Tip Harvester
> and archives of thelist go to: http://lists.evolt.org
> Workers of the Web, evolt !
>
From kyle.murphy at tempschedulingsystem.com Mon Nov 18 11:13:01 2002
From: kyle.murphy at tempschedulingsystem.com (Kyle Murphy)
Date: Mon Nov 18 11:13:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] What shall we do with the W3C DOM - part 2
In-Reply-To: <200211181652.gAIGqpSL023388@leo.evolt.org>
Message-ID: <001001c28f25$ed5c0d30$1f01000a@tempschedulingsystem.com>
That was a rhetorical question, by the way. I knew I was going to get
tons of negative responses.
Just to clear it up...No, I'm not an avant-garde designer/developer, no
I don't have any body piercings (and, if I did I wouldn't tell you), and
I do realize that some corporate environments are still in the stone
ages. That just sucks...plain and simple.
However, the original post was to go look at a designer's "experimental"
site & most people who are going to look at it are designers with 21"
monitors set at much higher resolution than 800x600.
Just baffles me that so many people still keep it that low, though.
Makes for horrible graphics rendering in my opinion....
Kyle
-----Original Message-----
From: thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org
[mailto:thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org] On Behalf Of aardvark
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 10:53 AM
To: thelist at lists.evolt.org
Subject: RE: [thelist] What shall we do with the W3C DOM - part 2
> From: "Kyle Murphy"
>
> Try setting your resolution above 800x600.....do people still use
> 800x600...and, if so, why?
- yes...
- because they want to...
let's not forget, not everyone has the same phat system as we all
do... believe it or not, i've been to many libraries and even corporate
environments that still run at 640x480, partly because they have to,
partly because some users want it (people over 40 do surf, after all,
and they don't always have great vision, or control over their
computer environment)...
of course, that question shouldn't even require an answer here,
since you have the ability to find it for yourself, and for your very
own audience, even:
Real-World Browser Size Stats, Part I
http://evolt.org/article/list/17/2295/
--
Read the evolt.org case study
Usability: The Site Speaks for Itself
http://amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1904151035/evoltorg02-20
ISBN: 1904151035
--
* * Please support the community that supports you. * *
http://evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
For unsubscribe and other options, including the Tip Harvester
and archives of thelist go to: http://lists.evolt.org
Workers of the Web, evolt !
From Craig.Saila at bgminteractive.com Mon Nov 18 11:14:01 2002
From: Craig.Saila at bgminteractive.com (Saila, Craig)
Date: Mon Nov 18 11:14:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] Javascript Querystring?
Message-ID: <523ED78FF1F87A44A40907C74F83CBC20333BB89@mail.bgm.globeinteractive.com>
> Is it possible to use some javascript to make all links on a
> page contain a querystring variable?
>
> eg get javascript to add '?foo=fee' to all links
I do that on my site to switch templates...
(normal)
(text-only)
...but it only works in W3C-DOM-compatible browsers.
The code snippet here would check to see if the query string contained a
variable, say "?foo=fee", and if it did it would add "?foo=fee" to all
the links:
(where v = the query string, for example, "?foo=fee")
function changeLink(v){
var links = document.getElementsByTagName("a");
for(x = 0; x < links.length; x++){
v = escape(v)
var the_link = escape(links[x])
if((the_link.indexOf(v)!=-1){
links[x].setAttribute("href",unescape(the_link) + v)
}
}
You'd call this function at the end of a page or onload. You may also
want to add filters in here (for example some links may have a
hard-coded query string, others you may not want to change).
--
Cheers,
Craig Saila
------------------------------------------
craig at saila.com : http://www.saila.com/
------------------------------------------
From carole at pixeltable.com Mon Nov 18 11:33:01 2002
From: carole at pixeltable.com (carole guevin)
Date: Mon Nov 18 11:33:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] What shall we do with the W3C DOM - part 2
In-Reply-To: <001001c28f25$ed5c0d30$1f01000a@tempschedulingsystem.com>
Message-ID:
:That was a rhetorical question, by the way. I knew I was going to get
:tons of negative responses.
thumb of rule: knowest your audience well :))
.c
From rob.smith at THERMON.com Mon Nov 18 11:42:02 2002
From: rob.smith at THERMON.com (Rob Smith)
Date: Mon Nov 18 11:42:02 2002
Subject: [thelist] Double login to a Secure Intranet Problem
Message-ID: <0CEC8258A6E4D611BE5400306E1CC9271E446B@smtmb.tmc.local>
Hi List,
About a half a year ago our company released a secure extranet to all our
employees world wide, which would provide a dynamic information vehicle to
special groups. The only encryption used is Windows NT/Challenge Response.
The site is running on a Win NT box, IIS 4.0. The clients are supposed to be
using IE 5.1 or greater and nothing else.
When our users "logon" to the extranet, they're prompted to enter their NT
account info: username, password, and domain. If the users click, remember
my password, and click ok (to log on), they are prompted with a second
password box, and have to reenter their NT account info. How can I avoid the
second login?
Additional info: The powers that be absolutely refuse to configure each
users browser security settings. They absolutely refuse to pay the presumed
5-digit payment to authenticate to Verisign or whomever controls the
verified authentication stuff to make us an official "Trusted Site." In
addition to the "Trusted site" issue, we're getting the expected security
warnings upon opening docs such as *.doc, *.xls, etc. This is starting to
get on their nerves.
Thanks guys/gals/(other?),
Rob.Smith
From pvandijck at lds.com Mon Nov 18 12:11:00 2002
From: pvandijck at lds.com (Peter VanDijck)
Date: Mon Nov 18 12:11:00 2002
Subject: [thelist] mod_gzip
References:
Message-ID: <3DD92D25.163EE942@lds.com>
Thanks!
Peter
MarsHall wrote:
>
> Peter...
>
> When mod_gzip is installed and enabled, the HTTP server will send the
> content encoded with gzip compression ONLY IF the requesting user-agent
> has gzip listed in it's "Accept-Encoding" header. Otherwise, the
> connection will proceed without compression. Most modern browsers do
> support gzip.
>
> AFAIK, the module works fine with PHP. It seems like output buffering
> in PHP would be a good practice if your expecting the pages to be
> gzipped on-the-fly...
>
> You need to understand how to install new Apache modules, if mod_gzip
> is not already installed, and edit the httpd.conf file in order to make
> it work (see doc links below). If you only have user-level access to a
> virtual server, this may be a problem... modules must be installed by
> root.
>
> The drawbacks are:
>
> --- processing overhead --- which is minor in most cases and can be
> completely circumvented by pre-gziping files, so that the server just
> sends the compressed file instead of compressing on-the-fly. This
> technique would only work for static files [i.e. not PHP], though.
>
> --- proxy/cache issues --- Apparently, some proxies and caches (that
> read actual HTML content such as meta-tags) do not play well with
> gzip-compressed HTTP content. I am left wondering if those devices
> would munge the page, drop the connection or throw an error?
>
> For unofficial documentation, see:
> http://www.schroepl.net/projekte/mod_gzip/
> http://www.darkmere.gen.nz/2000/1105.html
>
> Mars :)
>
> --
> * * Please support the community that supports you. * *
> http://evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>
> For unsubscribe and other options, including the Tip Harvester
> and archives of thelist go to: http://lists.evolt.org
> Workers of the Web, evolt !
From jeff at members.evolt.org Mon Nov 18 12:12:00 2002
From: jeff at members.evolt.org (.jeff)
Date: Mon Nov 18 12:12:00 2002
Subject: [thelist] Javascript Querystring?
In-Reply-To: <004501c28f15$fabe0ec0$0100a8c0@sigma>
Message-ID:
rick,
><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
> From: Rick [Kitty5]
>
> Is it possible to use some javascript to make all links
> on a page contain a querystring variable?
>
> eg get javascript to add '?foo=fee' to all links
><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
yup, easy as pie. check this out for an example of this:
http://members.evolt.org/jeff/code/ammend_links.cfm
all variations are accounted for:
1) links that already have a query string attached, but
with different name/value pairs
2) offsite links that don't need to have the name/value
pair attached.
3) name/value pair with an unknown value.
4) name/value pair that is one of several name/value
pairs in the url (making it impossible to simply
append location.search, but having to parse out the
name/value pairs first)
enjoy,
.jeff
http://evolt.org/
jeff at members.evolt.org
http://members.evolt.org/jeff/
From jeff at members.evolt.org Mon Nov 18 12:14:01 2002
From: jeff at members.evolt.org (.jeff)
Date: Mon Nov 18 12:14:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] Javascript Querystring?
In-Reply-To: <523ED78FF1F87A44A40907C74F83CBC20333BB89@mail.bgm.globeinteractive.com>
Message-ID:
craig,
><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
> From: Saila, Craig
>
> ...but it only works in W3C-DOM-compatible browsers.
><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
... but it doesn't need to be built that way. why build it to require a
w3c-dom compatible browser when it can be built to work on dom 0 browsers
just fine?
.jeff
http://evolt.org/
jeff at members.evolt.org
http://members.evolt.org/jeff/
From andrew at humanbehaviour.co.uk Mon Nov 18 12:16:01 2002
From: andrew at humanbehaviour.co.uk (Andrew Maynes)
Date: Mon Nov 18 12:16:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] mailing list software newsletters
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
can anyone recommend a decent freeware newsletter emailer?
Andrew
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.417 / Virus Database: 233 - Release Date: 08/11/2002
From kalos at carolina.rr.com Mon Nov 18 12:21:01 2002
From: kalos at carolina.rr.com (Benjamin)
Date: Mon Nov 18 12:21:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] Re: legalities of posting received emails on a website
In-Reply-To: <20021118164125.DDA5BBFCB@relay.evolt.org>
Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.2.20021118131050.00a66d90@pop-server.carolina.rr.com>
I would think so. Once it reaches my house (regular mail) it is mine. The
good is read while the spam/advertisements are sorted into various
recycling piles. Any that have the post paid mailing label are promptly
sent back with documents for other services stuffed back in (for good
measure). The same thing can be said of UCE/spam I receive in my email as
well. I'm currently collecting a bunch of this and adding commentary for a
part of the humor portion on my personal site. If they don't want it
posted perhaps they should reconsider sending it.
That being said, if the email was not UCE/spam but was still something I
want to post I'll strip all headers and ensure complete anonymity for all
parties involved before posting it to my public site. Unless anything is
strictly marked as confidential or for myself only it's fair game.
-benjamin
At 10:41 AM 11/18/2002 -0600, you wrote:
>Does email and postal mail differ in legalities? My understanding of
>postal mail is that once the mail is put into the post the recipient of
>that letter is the "owner" of it legally. Would this not be the same for
>email? Once it's received does not the recipient then "own" the message?
>
>~ Merlene
From lists at thinkbigideas.com Mon Nov 18 12:28:03 2002
From: lists at thinkbigideas.com (Anthony Baker)
Date: Mon Nov 18 12:28:03 2002
Subject: [thelist] mailing list software newsletters
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
Mojo Mail.
Absolutely love it. Mimics almost all of the functionality
found with apps like Topica, and can be completely customized
in every way possible. Handles small lists, large lists, has
batch sending options, etc.
http://mojo.skazat.com/
Cheers,
Anthony
| -----Original Message-----
| From: thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org
| [mailto:thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org]On Behalf Of Andrew Maynes
| Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 10:19 AM
| To: thelist at lists.evolt.org
| Subject: [thelist] mailing list software newsletters
|
|
| can anyone recommend a decent freeware newsletter emailer?
|
| Andrew
ers of the Web, evolt !
From a_j_dalton at hotmail.com Mon Nov 18 12:31:00 2002
From: a_j_dalton at hotmail.com (AJ Dalton)
Date: Mon Nov 18 12:31:00 2002
Subject: [thelist] legalities of posting received emails on a website
Message-ID:
Hi All -
The web is a new ball game - and I'm glad we're seeing discussions on this
and other things like it.
RE: the original question - 'is it legal'?
The discussion went to ownership. Maybe that is not the right question. A
painting or a car are items with value. E-Mai is communication. It is not
a work of art produced for one's own sake or for sale.
I doubt that any court would uphold any claim if you posted verifiable
copies of communication as 'information' or 'news'. We see this all the
time.
I assume that the recipient isn't trying to sell it or convey title to it
and probably is not trying to make a profit from it directly. Consumer
reporters write about businesses' actions and communications all the time.
They are merely reporting on something that happened.
FWIW,
AJ
_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
From Craig.Saila at bgminteractive.com Mon Nov 18 12:43:01 2002
From: Craig.Saila at bgminteractive.com (Saila, Craig)
Date: Mon Nov 18 12:43:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] Javascript Querystring?
Message-ID: <523ED78FF1F87A44A40907C74F83CBC20333BB8A@mail.bgm.globeinteractive.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: .jeff [mailto:jeff at members.evolt.org]
> Sent: November 18, 2002 1:13 PM
> ... but it doesn't need to be built that way. why build it
> to require a w3c-dom compatible browser when it can be built
> to work on dom 0 browsers just fine?
Because that's how I built it! ;)
(The script snippet was taken from my own site's core script. Since the
only versions of my site that gets it should be the W3C-DOM compliant
browsers -- which make up about 90% of my audience -- that's how I built
it.
The DOM 0 way would be just as good, and maybe better, but I'm more
comfortable doing it the W3C-DOM way.
For the record, here's the DOM 0 version of the aforementioned script
which works in most browsers:
function changeLink(v){
var links = document.links;
for(x = 0; x < links.length; x++){
v = escape(v)
var the_link = escape(links[x])
if((the_link.indexOf(v)!=-1){
links[x].href = unescape(the_link) + v
}
}
}
)
--
Cheers,
Craig Saila
------------------------------------------
craig at saila.com : http://www.saila.com/
------------------------------------------
From glenn at glenncarr.com Mon Nov 18 12:46:01 2002
From: glenn at glenncarr.com (Glenn Carr)
Date: Mon Nov 18 12:46:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] how to charge for ads?
Message-ID: <007c01c28f32$9e9ef6f0$eb97eac0@carr>
A client wants to charge for ads and is asking me how to structure the pricing.
And I have no idea. Does anyone have any pointers to guidelines regarding
pricing?
They want to know stuff like...
- What are typical up-front vs per-click charges?
- How does the weighting of ad display affect cost?
- How does page (home vs secondary) placement affect cost?
Any tips, pointers, or other resources would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks,
Glenn
From taranis at spittingllamas.com Mon Nov 18 12:50:01 2002
From: taranis at spittingllamas.com (Alex Ezell)
Date: Mon Nov 18 12:50:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] mailing list software newsletters
References:
Message-ID:
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 18:19:25 -0000, Andrew Maynes
wrote:
> can anyone recommend a decent freeware newsletter emailer?
Are you wanting to manage a mailing list only, or do you want software that
helps you create the newsletter as well?
If it's just managing a mailing list, Mailman is nice. For something that
handles creating the Newsletter at the same time, you could try MailWorks
Pro. It's not free, but it's very nice and relatively inexpensive.
--
Alex Ezell
http://www.spittingllamas.com
"Formal Restrictions, contrary to what you might think, free you up by allowing
you to concentrate on purer ideas."
- Winter Sorbeck in Chip Kidd's The Cheese Monkeys
From carole at pixeltable.com Mon Nov 18 12:56:01 2002
From: carole at pixeltable.com (carole guevin)
Date: Mon Nov 18 12:56:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] mailing list software newsletters
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
hi Andrew,
:> can anyone recommend a decent freeware newsletter emailer?
Though not free - we have recently develop a one way newsletter / list
management little soft. Which I'm beta running on netdiver right now. Kewl.
If interested - we're working on a demo site that should launch in the next
couple of weeks. Do let me know.
The interesting portion for web-dev - is that it will be available for
non-exlusive licensing. Meaning, as web shop you could resell to your
customers.
.c
From cparker at swatgear.com Mon Nov 18 12:56:08 2002
From: cparker at swatgear.com (Chris W. Parker)
Date: Mon Nov 18 12:56:08 2002
Subject: [thelist] CSS: rendering problem
Message-ID: <001BD19C96E6E64E8750D72C2EA0ECEE1ADE58@ati-ex-01.ati.local>
hi.
i am working on a simple intranet site right now and ie6 is doing a
weird thing (as expected?). i'm venturing into the world of tableless
design with this simple project and frankly i'm dissapointed so far.
maybe it's my own fault, or maybe it's just ie.
when i load the page in question, the main body
which encapsulates
a few other
's is rendered about 25% of the height it should be. if
i switch to another window and cover up the page, it will be correctly
drawn. as well as if i scroll down, i will see the bottom of the content
box as if it had been drawn correctly.
(i'm going to do a diagram of the page because this site is internal. i
can of course provide code if need be.)
12345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890
+--------------------------------------------+
| |
| +----------------------------------------+ |
| | Here Is The Header | |
| +----------------------------------------+ |
| |
| +-------+ +-----------------------------+ |
| |Here | | Here Is The Content Box In | |
| |Is The | | Question | |
| |Menu | +-----------------------------+ |
| +-------+ Here Is The Content Of The |
| Content Box In Question |
| | | |
| | Here Is Some More Content | |
| | For The Content Box | |
| +-----------------------------+ |
+--------------------------------------------+
the page background is a medium blue, the boxes have a white background
with a medium-dark blue 5 pixel border.
mind you, the diagram i made is what the page looks like if i scroll
down to the bottom and back up again to the top. if i don't scroll at
all after the page loads (and on reload as well) i will only see what
appears to be a complete main body content box with content spilling out
of it.
any ideas off the top of your head?
thanks,
chris.
From ben_dyer at imaginuity.com Mon Nov 18 13:12:01 2002
From: ben_dyer at imaginuity.com (Ben Dyer)
Date: Mon Nov 18 13:12:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] ColdFusion MX, IIS 5 and Custom Errors
In-Reply-To: <003b01c28f25$24d07b80$6461a8c0@vader>
References: <5.1.1.6.0.20021118104120.01911380@mail.imaginuity.com>
Message-ID: <5.1.1.6.0.20021118130034.01990ff8@mail.imaginuity.com>
At 11:08 AM 11/18/2002, Raymond Camden wrote:
>Ben - I'm not seeing this. Is this a multi-homed server? You may need to
>do the 'check that file exists' thing on each of the sites.
Well, whatever it was, it just started working when I reset the WWW
service. I thought that I'd already done that, though. I guess not.
--Ben
If you are setting up custom error pages in IIS for file types that are not
natively handled by IIS (ColdFusion, for instance), make sure that if you
want IIS to process the 404 errors, you tell IIS to check that file exists
for those file types. To change this, go to Internet Information Services,
right-click on the WWW site and select properties, click on the "Home
Directory" tab, then the "Configuration" button, select the file type in
question, click "Edit" and then make sure the checkbox that says "Check
that File Exists" is checked. *After restarting the service*, IIS will now
handle any 404 errors for that file type.
From andrew at humanbehaviour.co.uk Mon Nov 18 13:17:01 2002
From: andrew at humanbehaviour.co.uk (Andrew Maynes)
Date: Mon Nov 18 13:17:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] mailing list software newsletters
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
Cheers Alex
Where can this be downloaded? It runs on a windows platform, is that right?
Andrew
-----Original Message-----
From: thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org
[mailto:thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org]On Behalf Of Alex Ezell
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 18:50
To: thelist at lists.evolt.org
Subject: Re: [thelist] mailing list software newsletters
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 18:19:25 -0000, Andrew Maynes
wrote:
> can anyone recommend a decent freeware newsletter emailer?
Are you wanting to manage a mailing list only, or do you want software that
helps you create the newsletter as well?
If it's just managing a mailing list, Mailman is nice. For something that
handles creating the Newsletter at the same time, you could try MailWorks
Pro. It's not free, but it's very nice and relatively inexpensive.
--
Alex Ezell
http://www.spittingllamas.com
"Formal Restrictions, contrary to what you might think, free you up by allowing
you to concentrate on purer ideas."
- Winter Sorbeck in Chip Kidd's The Cheese Monkeys
--
* * Please support the community that supports you. * *
http://evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
For unsubscribe and other options, including the Tip Harvester
and archives of thelist go to: http://lists.evolt.org
Workers of the Web, evolt !
---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.417 / Virus Database: 233 - Release Date: 08/11/2002
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.417 / Virus Database: 233 - Release Date: 08/11/2002
From andrew at humanbehaviour.co.uk Mon Nov 18 13:19:01 2002
From: andrew at humanbehaviour.co.uk (Andrew Maynes)
Date: Mon Nov 18 13:19:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] mailing list software newsletters
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
I think mojo might not be allowed on my hosts server :( I have tried everything
else wiithout success running from a local machine. Postcast Server is limited
to sending 50 emails at a time even when running a php script with Mysql locally
:( so my solutions are starting to dry up.
I really didn't think it wuld be this dificult to send out 3-400 emails in one
hit.
Andrew
-----Original Message-----
From: thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org
[mailto:thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org]On Behalf Of Anthony Baker
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 18:27
To: thelist at lists.evolt.org
Subject: RE: [thelist] mailing list software newsletters
Mojo Mail.
Absolutely love it. Mimics almost all of the functionality
found with apps like Topica, and can be completely customized
in every way possible. Handles small lists, large lists, has
batch sending options, etc.
http://mojo.skazat.com/
Cheers,
Anthony
| -----Original Message-----
| From: thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org
| [mailto:thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org]On Behalf Of Andrew Maynes
| Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 10:19 AM
| To: thelist at lists.evolt.org
| Subject: [thelist] mailing list software newsletters
|
|
| can anyone recommend a decent freeware newsletter emailer?
|
| Andrew
ers of the Web, evolt !
--
* * Please support the community that supports you. * *
http://evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
For unsubscribe and other options, including the Tip Harvester
and archives of thelist go to: http://lists.evolt.org
Workers of the Web, evolt !
---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.417 / Virus Database: 233 - Release Date: 08/11/2002
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.417 / Virus Database: 233 - Release Date: 08/11/2002
From rick at kitty5.com Mon Nov 18 13:20:01 2002
From: rick at kitty5.com (Rick [Kitty5])
Date: Mon Nov 18 13:20:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] CSS: rendering problem
References: <001BD19C96E6E64E8750D72C2EA0ECEE1ADE58@ati-ex-01.ati.local>
Message-ID: <007501c28f37$33cafef0$0100a8c0@sigma>
Chris W. Parker wrote:
> hi.
>
> i am working on a simple intranet site right now and ie6 is doing a
> weird thing (as expected?). i'm venturing into the world of tableless
> design with this simple project and frankly i'm dissapointed so far.
post a URL, its so much simpler to help if we have some markup to play with
:)
Rick
Kitty5 NewMedia http://Kitty5.co.uk
POV-Ray News & Resources http://Povray.co.uk
TEL : +44 (01270) 501101 - FAX : +44 (01270) 251105 - ICQ : 15776037
PGP Public Key
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x231E1CEA
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.419 / Virus Database: 235 - Release Date: 13/11/2002
From rick at kitty5.com Mon Nov 18 13:20:06 2002
From: rick at kitty5.com (Rick [Kitty5])
Date: Mon Nov 18 13:20:06 2002
Subject: [thelist] Javascript Querystring?
References:
Message-ID: <007601c28f37$3435f5c0$0100a8c0@sigma>
.jeff wrote:
> yup, easy as pie. check this out for an example of this:
>
> http://members.evolt.org/jeff/code/ammend_links.cfm
Magic :)
Rick
Kitty5 NewMedia http://Kitty5.co.uk
POV-Ray News & Resources http://Povray.co.uk
TEL : +44 (01270) 501101 - FAX : +44 (01270) 251105 - ICQ : 15776037
PGP Public Key
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x231E1CEA
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.419 / Virus Database: 235 - Release Date: 13/11/2002
From taranis at spittingllamas.com Mon Nov 18 13:28:01 2002
From: taranis at spittingllamas.com (Alex Ezell)
Date: Mon Nov 18 13:28:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] CSS: rendering problem
References: <001BD19C96E6E64E8750D72C2EA0ECEE1ADE58@ati-ex-01.ati.local>
Message-ID:
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 10:55:48 -0800, Chris W. Parker wrote:
> any ideas off the top of your head?
My first thought is that you might try putting this div after all the other
divs in your code:
It's a little IE quirk that seems to make this necessary. If that doesn't
work, you may have to post the code.
--
Alex Ezell
http://www.spittingllamas.com
"Formal Restrictions, contrary to what you might think, free you up by allowing
you to concentrate on purer ideas."
- Winter Sorbeck in Chip Kidd's The Cheese Monkeys
From taranis at spittingllamas.com Mon Nov 18 13:33:01 2002
From: taranis at spittingllamas.com (Alex Ezell)
Date: Mon Nov 18 13:33:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] mailing list software newsletters
References:
Message-ID:
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 19:20:05 -0000, Andrew Maynes
wrote:
> Where can this be downloaded? It runs on a windows platform, is that
> right?
Mailman - http://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/mailman.html
Runs on *nix systems with most any webserver (I use Apache), but whatever
it is has to have Python support.
Manages lists easily. All HTML is configurable/modifiable. Fast.
MailWorks Pro - http://www.mailworkspro.com/ - $79.95
Linux - Apache - PHP and MySQL required.
Does one-way newsletters very nicely. All web-based after setup. Creation
of HTML newsletters is web-based as well.
--
Alex Ezell
http://www.spittingllamas.com
"Formal Restrictions, contrary to what you might think, free you up by allowing
you to concentrate on purer ideas."
- Winter Sorbeck in Chip Kidd's The Cheese Monkeys
From cparker at swatgear.com Mon Nov 18 13:39:01 2002
From: cparker at swatgear.com (Chris W. Parker)
Date: Mon Nov 18 13:39:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] CSS: rendering problem
Message-ID: <001BD19C96E6E64E8750D72C2EA0ECEE14E09D@ati-ex-01.ati.local>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Ezell [mailto:taranis at spittingllamas.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 11:27 AM
> To: thelist at lists.evolt.org
> Subject: Re: [thelist] CSS: rendering problem
>
> My first thought is that you might try putting this div after
> all the other
> divs in your code:
>
>
no luck.
here is the page code.
------------------------------------
Aardvark Tactical Employee Homepage
--------------------------------------------
and here is the css (it's a little unrefined because i mean, i'm not an
expert or anything.)
--------------------------------------------
body {
font-family: verdana, sans-serif;
font-size: 100%;
background: #44A8E9;
}
/*div {
border: 1px solid #00F;
}*/
#header {
/* position: absolute;
left: 10px;
top: 13px;*/
margin: 2px;
padding: 10px;
border: 5px solid #398CC3;
background: #fff;
height: 50px;
}
#header h1 {
font-family: verdana;
font-size: 1em;
font-weight: bold;
color: #800000;
margin: 0px;
padding: 0px;
}
#nav {
position: absolute;
left: 10px;
margin: 2px;
padding: 10px;
border: 5px solid #398CC3;
background: #fff;
width: 111px;
}
#nav ul {
font-size: 1em;
margin: 0em;
padding: 0em;
}
div.spacer {
clear: both;
}
#content_container {
/*
top right bottom left
*/
margin: 4px 2px 0px 118px;
padding: 10px;
border: 5px solid #398CC3;
background: #fff;
}
#content_googleSearch {
/* float: left;*/
width: 100%;
}
#content_vendors {
float: left;
width: 25%;
}
#content_serviceProviders {
float: left;
width: 25%;
}
#content_utilities {
float: left;
width: 50%;
}
li {
font-size: .8em;
}
p {
font-size: .8em;
}
img {
border: 0px none #000000;
}
label {
font-family: verdana;
font-size: .8em;
}
--------------------------------------
thanks for the help y'all.
chris.
From cparker at swatgear.com Mon Nov 18 13:44:01 2002
From: cparker at swatgear.com (Chris W. Parker)
Date: Mon Nov 18 13:44:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] CSS: rendering problem
Message-ID: <001BD19C96E6E64E8750D72C2EA0ECEE14E09F@ati-ex-01.ati.local>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rick [Kitty5] [mailto:rick at kitty5.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 11:00 AM
> To: thelist at lists.evolt.org
> Subject: Re: [thelist] CSS: rendering problem
>
>
> Chris W. Parker wrote:
> > hi.
> >
> > i am working on a simple intranet site right now and ie6 is doing a
> > weird thing (as expected?). i'm venturing into the world of
> tableless
> > design with this simple project and frankly i'm dissapointed so far.
>
> post a URL, its so much simpler to help if we have some
> markup to play with
> :)
oh geez. i sure as heck thought i mentioned that this was internal only.
can't reach it from the outside.
however, if my most recent post does not produce any fruit i will move
the pages to our external website so you can see it.
chris.
From dan at danromanchik.com Mon Nov 18 13:52:01 2002
From: dan at danromanchik.com (Dan Romanchik)
Date: Mon Nov 18 13:52:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] Mailing Lists: Another Tack
References: <007c01c28f32$9e9ef6f0$eb97eac0@carr>
Message-ID: <004701c28f3b$efabc790$c27ba8c0@D9J77B01>
I've been reading about mailing list scripts on this list for quite a while
now. I've even downloaded several packages, including PHPList, VList Lite,
and at least one other, whose name escapes me. While these are all good
packages, they all suffer one big disadvantage. That is, they don't receive
e-mails. This limits their usefulness in a couple of ways:
1. You can only use them for announcement-only mailing lists.
2. They don't track delivery and returns.
3. You can't use them for open mailing lists.
Instead, what I've been thinking of doing is building a front end to the
mailing list services run by Topica or SparkList. This would let me:
- build subscribe/unsubscribe pages that look like the client's website,
- write code that would let me manage paid subscription newsletters,
- use the service's tools for subscriber management and delivery tracking,
- use the services tools for ad management, and
- offer open mailing lists that subscriber can use to communicate
with one another as well as announcement type mailing lists.
It's not free to do things this way, but the price is pretty reasonable, I
think, for the extra functionality. On Topica, for example, if your volume
is under 10,000 e-mails per month, the cost is $225 for as many lists as you
care to set up (if you pay annually). If your volume is less than 25,000
e-mails per month, the cost is $405. If you're running a non-profit website
that may pinch a little, but if you're running a commercial website, that
cost is certainly not prohibitive.
I wouldn't be surprised if there wasn't already a package out there that
does this, but I haven't yet found one. Does anyone know of something like
this or have other ideas to offer?
Thanks for your attention!
Dan
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dan Romanchik - Web Developer
dan at danromanchik.com, 734-930-6564
From andrew at humanbehaviour.co.uk Mon Nov 18 14:02:01 2002
From: andrew at humanbehaviour.co.uk (Andrew Maynes)
Date: Mon Nov 18 14:02:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] Mailing Lists: Another Tack
In-Reply-To: <004701c28f3b$efabc790$c27ba8c0@D9J77B01>
Message-ID:
Dan there are loads of newsletter scripts that you can sub unsub. I will dig
out a couple of links...
I an still looking for a free smpt server that sits on a win98 box if anyone has
found one :)
Andrew
-----Original Message-----
From: thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org
[mailto:thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org]On Behalf Of Dan Romanchik
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 19:52
To: thelist at lists.evolt.org
Subject: [thelist] Mailing Lists: Another Tack
I've been reading about mailing list scripts on this list for quite a while
now. I've even downloaded several packages, including PHPList, VList Lite,
and at least one other, whose name escapes me. While these are all good
packages, they all suffer one big disadvantage. That is, they don't receive
e-mails. This limits their usefulness in a couple of ways:
1. You can only use them for announcement-only mailing lists.
2. They don't track delivery and returns.
3. You can't use them for open mailing lists.
Instead, what I've been thinking of doing is building a front end to the
mailing list services run by Topica or SparkList. This would let me:
- build subscribe/unsubscribe pages that look like the client's website,
- write code that would let me manage paid subscription newsletters,
- use the service's tools for subscriber management and delivery tracking,
- use the services tools for ad management, and
- offer open mailing lists that subscriber can use to communicate
with one another as well as announcement type mailing lists.
It's not free to do things this way, but the price is pretty reasonable, I
think, for the extra functionality. On Topica, for example, if your volume
is under 10,000 e-mails per month, the cost is $225 for as many lists as you
care to set up (if you pay annually). If your volume is less than 25,000
e-mails per month, the cost is $405. If you're running a non-profit website
that may pinch a little, but if you're running a commercial website, that
cost is certainly not prohibitive.
I wouldn't be surprised if there wasn't already a package out there that
does this, but I haven't yet found one. Does anyone know of something like
this or have other ideas to offer?
Thanks for your attention!
Dan
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dan Romanchik - Web Developer
dan at danromanchik.com, 734-930-6564
--
* * Please support the community that supports you. * *
http://evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
For unsubscribe and other options, including the Tip Harvester
and archives of thelist go to: http://lists.evolt.org
Workers of the Web, evolt !
---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.417 / Virus Database: 233 - Release Date: 08/11/2002
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.417 / Virus Database: 233 - Release Date: 08/11/2002
From andrew at humanbehaviour.co.uk Mon Nov 18 14:17:01 2002
From: andrew at humanbehaviour.co.uk (Andrew Maynes)
Date: Mon Nov 18 14:17:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] Mailing Lists: Another Tack
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
this one was groovy,
http://www.triangle-solutions.com/
But I could get the thing to work locally :( with postcast server! We did try
though didn't we Tony ;)
Andrew
-----Original Message-----
From: thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org
[mailto:thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org]On Behalf Of Andrew Maynes
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 20:06
To: thelist at lists.evolt.org
Subject: RE: [thelist] Mailing Lists: Another Tack
Dan there are loads of newsletter scripts that you can sub unsub. I will dig
out a couple of links...
I an still looking for a free smpt server that sits on a win98 box if anyone has
found one :)
Andrew
-----Original Message-----
From: thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org
[mailto:thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org]On Behalf Of Dan Romanchik
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 19:52
To: thelist at lists.evolt.org
Subject: [thelist] Mailing Lists: Another Tack
I've been reading about mailing list scripts on this list for quite a while
now. I've even downloaded several packages, including PHPList, VList Lite,
and at least one other, whose name escapes me. While these are all good
packages, they all suffer one big disadvantage. That is, they don't receive
e-mails. This limits their usefulness in a couple of ways:
1. You can only use them for announcement-only mailing lists.
2. They don't track delivery and returns.
3. You can't use them for open mailing lists.
Instead, what I've been thinking of doing is building a front end to the
mailing list services run by Topica or SparkList. This would let me:
- build subscribe/unsubscribe pages that look like the client's website,
- write code that would let me manage paid subscription newsletters,
- use the service's tools for subscriber management and delivery tracking,
- use the services tools for ad management, and
- offer open mailing lists that subscriber can use to communicate
with one another as well as announcement type mailing lists.
It's not free to do things this way, but the price is pretty reasonable, I
think, for the extra functionality. On Topica, for example, if your volume
is under 10,000 e-mails per month, the cost is $225 for as many lists as you
care to set up (if you pay annually). If your volume is less than 25,000
e-mails per month, the cost is $405. If you're running a non-profit website
that may pinch a little, but if you're running a commercial website, that
cost is certainly not prohibitive.
I wouldn't be surprised if there wasn't already a package out there that
does this, but I haven't yet found one. Does anyone know of something like
this or have other ideas to offer?
Thanks for your attention!
Dan
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dan Romanchik - Web Developer
dan at danromanchik.com, 734-930-6564
--
* * Please support the community that supports you. * *
http://evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
For unsubscribe and other options, including the Tip Harvester
and archives of thelist go to: http://lists.evolt.org
Workers of the Web, evolt !
---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.417 / Virus Database: 233 - Release Date: 08/11/2002
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.417 / Virus Database: 233 - Release Date: 08/11/2002
--
* * Please support the community that supports you. * *
http://evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
For unsubscribe and other options, including the Tip Harvester
and archives of thelist go to: http://lists.evolt.org
Workers of the Web, evolt !
---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.417 / Virus Database: 233 - Release Date: 08/11/2002
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.417 / Virus Database: 233 - Release Date: 08/11/2002
From ken.kogler at curf.edu Mon Nov 18 14:17:09 2002
From: ken.kogler at curf.edu (Ken Kogler)
Date: Mon Nov 18 14:17:09 2002
Subject: [thelist] CSS: rendering problem
In-Reply-To: <001BD19C96E6E64E8750D72C2EA0ECEE1ADE58@ati-ex-01.ati.local>
Message-ID: <000801c28f3f$54ac6110$5a04810a@maegreatha>
> maybe it's my own fault, or maybe it's just ie.
Sounds like this one is IE.
> when i load the page in question, the main body
which
> encapsulates a few other
's is rendered about 25% of
> the height it should be. If i switch to another window and
> cover up the page, it will be correctly drawn. as well as
> if i scroll down, i will see the bottom of the content box
> as if it had been drawn correctly.
This sounds like the same issue that AListApart ran into -- their
content block was getting chopped off in IE6 on the initial load.
Try adding this code to your : (wrap alert!)
-------------------------------------------
if (document.all && window.attachEvent) {
window.attachEvent("onload", fixWinIE); }
function fixWinIE() {
if (document.body.scrollHeight <
document.all.content.offsetHeight) {
document.all.content.style.display = 'block'; }
}
-------------------------------------------
This was suggested by Aaron Boodman of youngpup.net, and can be found on
Zeldman's site here:
So sayeth the Zeldman:
"Aaron Boodman wrote a tiny JavaScript function
that, in the presence of IE/Windows, iterates
an existing property of the content block, causing
the page to reflow and display correctly. We've
added Aaron's script to ALA's primary, global
JavaScript file, and the site now seems to work
correctly in Microsoft's flagship Windows browser.
We also reported Eddie and Aaron's findings to
Microsoft to help that company fix its browser
bug in a future upgrade. "
Let us know if that works for you!
HTH!
--ken
From persist1 at io.com Mon Nov 18 14:23:00 2002
From: persist1 at io.com (Ben Henick)
Date: Mon Nov 18 14:23:00 2002
Subject: Why 800x600 was RE: [thelist] What shall we do with the W3C DOM -
part 2
In-Reply-To: <000801c28f17$657aed90$1f01000a@tempschedulingsystem.com>
Message-ID:
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Kyle Murphy wrote:
> Try setting your resolution above 800x600.....do people still use
> 800x600...and, if so, why?
Bearing in mind that this was originally asked as a rhetorical question,
but has since been jumped upon by some very smart people...
Meanwhile, I'm waiting for someone to show up on one of these lists who's
a serious cheeleader for lower resolutions.
For myself... I'm one of the multiple window users that Carole describes.
My "main" window as a rule is resized (bookmarklet) to 848x960; I run
1280x1024x24 'cause I'm running old hardware on an integrated mobo (which
makes for one of the most stable systems I've ever used, which in turn is
why I put up with it).
...And I'm one of those people who will drop into 1280x1024 on a 17in/43cm
CRT without flinching (though I tend to sit much closer to the display in
that environment).
Why?
Because I've been using computers long enough to know what happens to
one's efficiency when they have more display area to work with. This is
no less true for programming than design or content tasks, IMO.
Browsing fullscreen or anything close to it, defeats the purpose for which
I once put myself into hock for my 19" display, and why a 23" display and
new video card are definitely on my wish list.
Meanwhile...
The decline of optical acuity experienced by folks as they get older,
cannot be understated. Ask any optician or opthalmologist; they'll
doubtless be able to launch into details that would surprise you.
In fact... could anyone's opthalmologist be encouraged to help develop an
article for the site? (I don't have one, else I'd see what I could do.)
--
Ben Henick
Web Author At-Large Associate Editor
http://www.io.com/persist1/ http://www.digital-web.com/
persist1 at io.com bmh at digital-web.com
--
"Are you pondering what I'm pondering, Pinky?"
"I think so, Brain, but... (snort) no, no, it's too stupid."
"We will disguise ourselves as a cow."
"Oh!" (giggles) "That was it exactly!"
From cparker at swatgear.com Mon Nov 18 14:31:01 2002
From: cparker at swatgear.com (Chris W. Parker)
Date: Mon Nov 18 14:31:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] CSS: rendering problem
Message-ID: <001BD19C96E6E64E8750D72C2EA0ECEE1ADE5A@ati-ex-01.ati.local>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ken Kogler [mailto:ken.kogler at curf.edu]
> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 12:16 PM
> To: thelist at lists.evolt.org
> Subject: RE: [thelist] CSS: rendering problem
>
>
> Try adding this code to your : (wrap alert!)
>
> -------------------------------------------
> if (document.all && window.attachEvent) {
> window.attachEvent("onload", fixWinIE); }
>
> function fixWinIE() {
> if (document.body.scrollHeight <
> document.all.content.offsetHeight) {
> document.all.content.style.display = 'block'; }
> }
> -------------------------------------------
gives me an error: "'document.all.content.offsetHeight' is null or not
an object"
this is what i've got in the .
---------------------------
---------------------------
i should note that this happens each time i press refresh, not just the
initial load. highlighting overflowed text will cause the page behind
the highlighted area to be drawn correctly.
chris.
From rob.smith at THERMON.com Mon Nov 18 14:53:01 2002
From: rob.smith at THERMON.com (Rob Smith)
Date: Mon Nov 18 14:53:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] Double login to a Secure Intranet Problem [Resolved
]
Message-ID: <0CEC8258A6E4D611BE5400306E1CC9271E446D@smtmb.tmc.local>
Hi list,
Once again, I have found a solution to my own problem. I'm posting the
answer solely because there doesn't exist any documentation regarding this
issue anywhere! (not even in M$) I was mislead into thinking that all our
users had to login twice. That's not the case. Only one person made the
accusation of all, when he alone had to do it, not everyone.
Anywho , the only reason why you'd get the login screen again, is if any
information (account, password, domain) was not right. Well this just
happened to be the case. This user had cached the incorrect password and
clicked "Save my password" checkbox. Thus, causing him to have to login
twice each time.
In a test to prove my theory, I had him retype his password before going to
the second login screen and he went straight into the extranet. wow ...
amazing isn't it. Yet another entry into the "Hall of Shame - IT Division"
Rob.Smith
-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Smith [mailto:rob.smith at THERMON.com]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 11:46 AM
To: Thelist (E-mail)
Subject: [thelist] Double login to a Secure Intranet Problem
Hi List,
About a half a year ago our company released a secure extranet to all our
employees world wide, which would provide a dynamic information vehicle to
special groups. The only encryption used is Windows NT/Challenge Response.
The site is running on a Win NT box, IIS 4.0. The clients are supposed to be
using IE 5.1 or greater and nothing else.
When our users "logon" to the extranet, they're prompted to enter their NT
account info: username, password, and domain. If the users click, remember
my password, and click ok (to log on), they are prompted with a second
password box, and have to reenter their NT account info. How can I avoid the
second login?
Additional info: The powers that be absolutely refuse to configure each
users browser security settings. They absolutely refuse to pay the presumed
5-digit payment to authenticate to Verisign or whomever controls the
verified authentication stuff to make us an official "Trusted Site." In
addition to the "Trusted site" issue, we're getting the expected security
warnings upon opening docs such as *.doc, *.xls, etc. This is starting to
get on their nerves.
Thanks guys/gals/(other?),
Rob.Smith
--
* * Please support the community that supports you. * *
http://evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
For unsubscribe and other options, including the Tip Harvester
and archives of thelist go to: http://lists.evolt.org
Workers of the Web, evolt !
From jpaul at jpauldesign.com Mon Nov 18 15:09:01 2002
From: jpaul at jpauldesign.com (J Paul Armstrong)
Date: Mon Nov 18 15:09:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] My Query string not getting results in pages
Message-ID:
Page Numbering in MySQL results pages (used for a small book catalog search)
:
I have a query string that selects based on the search the user does; which
works. When I've implemented the page/limit results, when you click on any
of the page numbers, the query string stops working. Here is the query ...
{
$query="select * from book_catalog where last like '%".$searchterm."%' or
first like '%".$searchterm."%' or title like '%".$searchterm."%' or genre
like '%".$searchterm."%' order by last";
}
else
{
$query="select * from book_catalog where ".$searchtype." like
'%".$searchterm."%' order by last";
}
$result = mysql_query($query);
$num_results = mysql_num_rows($result);
All the results come up fine, based on the code provided, the first time you
search and get results. But when you click on any of the page numbers, the
query seems not to work anymore - where the keyword field is blank, it
doesn't seem to understand that anymore (where it does the first time you
search). I get errors. Here's the link to try it out ...
http://www.mercantilelibrary.com/catalog/searchtest.php
Thanks for the help in advance.
++ jpaul design | simplify
[ www.jpauldesign.com ]
++ 513.531.4849
204.209.0219
++ 3763 mt vernon ave
cincinnati, oh
45209
From taranis at spittingllamas.com Mon Nov 18 15:20:01 2002
From: taranis at spittingllamas.com (Alex Ezell)
Date: Mon Nov 18 15:20:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] My Query string not getting results in pages
References:
Message-ID:
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 16:08:30 -0500, J Paul Armstrong
wrote:
> Page Numbering in MySQL results pages (used for a small book catalog
> search)
> :
> I have a query string that selects based on the search the user does;
> which
> works. When I've implemented the page/limit results, when you click on
> any
> of the page numbers, the query string stops working.
Do you mean the limiting of results per page or the paging of the result
set?
The page numbers at the bottom of the results don't seem to be links for
me.
Anyway, I noticed that the links for #results for page carry the query in
the URL. However, the search term is not included. That's the first thing I
would check out.
It's a little hard without seeing the PHP, but that's what I would try.
--
Alex Ezell
http://www.spittingllamas.com
"Formal Restrictions, contrary to what you might think, free you up by allowing
you to concentrate on purer ideas."
- Winter Sorbeck in Chip Kidd's The Cheese Monkeys
From jbauer at chimesnet.com Mon Nov 18 15:26:01 2002
From: jbauer at chimesnet.com (Jason Bauer)
Date: Mon Nov 18 15:26:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] My Query string not getting results in pages
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
> ----Original Message-----
> From: thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org
> [mailto:thelist-admin at lists.evolt.org]On Behalf Of J Paul Armstrong
> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 4:09 PM
> To: thelist at lists.evolt.org
> Subject: [thelist] My Query string not getting results in pages
>
> All the results come up fine, based on the code provided, the first time
you
> search and get results. But when you click on any of the page numbers, the
> query seems not to work anymore - where the keyword field is blank, it
> doesn't seem to understand that anymore (where it does the first time you
> search). I get errors. Here's the link to try it out ...
> http://www.mercantilelibrary.com/catalog/searchtest.php
The problem is that the link to the "Next Page" isn't sending the same data
as the original search form.
Your original search form is sending a $searchtype and a $searchterm. But,
if you'll look at the link after you click on the Next Page, it isn't
sending either of those values, only a query.
Based on the snippet of code you gave, your else clause is overwriting the
query sent from the page. So, instead of simply an else in that statement,
do an:
elseif($searchterm)
{
$query = "blahblah";
}
This will only overwrite the $query if a search term is specified from your
original search form. This should let the query sent by the "Next" link go
through unhindered.
Hope this helps!
---
Jason Bauer
jbauer at chimesnet.com
Programmer/Analyst
Chimes, Inc.
From slewis at macrovista.net Mon Nov 18 15:39:01 2002
From: slewis at macrovista.net (Steve Lewis)
Date: Mon Nov 18 15:39:01 2002
Subject: [thelist] My Query string not getting results in pages
References:
Message-ID: <3DD95F95.1030504@macrovista.net>
J Paul Armstrong wrote:
> I have a query string that selects based on the search the user does; which
> works. When I've implemented the page/limit results, when you click on any
> of the page numbers, the query string stops working. Here is the query ...
Consider changing the way your paging works. I used 'barn' as my search
string for all fields. When I click on '10' results per page it uses the
url of (watch wrap, and I converted %20s to spaces):
http://www.mercantilelibrary.com/catalog/resulttest.php?query=select *
from book_catalog where last like '%barn%' or first like '%barn%' or
title like '%barn%' or genre like '%barn%' order by last&pageno=0&limit=10
It seems to me to be a very bad idea to pass a query in the url. For
example: if you execute a query that was passed in the url, there is
nothing to keep me from changing this url to (watch wrap, and I
converted %20s to spaces)
http://www.mercantilelibrary.com/catalog/resulttest.php?query=drop
book_catalog ...and you probably don't want me doing that.
My recommendation would be to change the selection method for results
per page to be a