On 3/9/03 10:42 pm, "Thompson, Daniel" <Daniel.Thompson at fishnetsecurity.com> wrote: > My confusion lies over this document, which I read recently and makes a > *lot* of sense, as far as I can tell. > > Makes me think the whole xhtml thing is flat-out wrong. > > Should I go back to html 4.strict? Is that what Dan should be teaching? > > http://www.hixie.ch/advocacy/xhtml I read this article yesterday: http://diveintomark.org/archives/2003/08/29/semantics Which delves into xhtml towards the end. Im still unclear, Should I be using HTML 4 or XHTML? What are the gains to be had? Ben