[thelist] Re: ISO HTML

[Timothy J. Luoma]

On Mon, 24 May 2004 12:12:38 +0100, Joel Konkle-Parker <jjk3 at msstate.edu>  
wrote:

> If I decided that ISO-HTML wasn't worth pursuing, I'd probably switch to  
> XHTML 1.1 instead. Any thoughts?

If you want to be picky, XHTML 1.1 strongly suggests that it ought to be  
sent with MIME type application/xhtml+xml (or something like that) and not  
text/html.  However, that will keep anyone using a certain browser with  
large installed user base from viewing the site.

XHTML 1.0 Strict as text/html is (more) allowed, and you don't really gain  
anything from XHTML 1.1 IMO.

TjL