On Mon, 24 May 2004 18:38:08 +0100, David Dorward <evolt at david.us-lot.org> wrote: > On Mon, 2004-05-24 at 12:12, Joel Konkle-Parker wrote: > >> If I decided that ISO-HTML wasn't worth pursuing, I'd probably switch >> to XHTML 1.1 instead. Any thoughts? > > Given that XHTML "SHOULD NOT"[1] be served as text/html, Just to clarify what I think you were saying http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-media-types/#summary says that XHTML 1.1 "SHOULD NOT" be served as text/html XHTML 1.0 "MAY" be served at text/html. TjL