On 23 Oct 2005 at 13:33, VOLKAN ZEL K wrote: > again a correction: > > you do have a circular reference (an importance difference :) ) [...] > "this" refers to variance "x" (hence a circular reference). > > I got confused about the usage of the keyword "this". Sorry for the > misleading post. it's all good... i appreciate the eyes... [...] > However, I still suggest to benchmark your code and see if there is a > memory leak (may be with latest patches of IE the issue has been > solved for good, I don't know) the site referenced in my original post (chop the JS path) has a problem in IE in that it seems to take 2 or more seconds longer for the page to render as a result of the script -- whether it's attachEvent or the code within... can you tell me how snappy the page renders for you in IE vs. FF? is attachEvent inherently a resource hog?