> Yes, the latter are formally DHTML, but you don't want to be talking > about DHTML in this millennium. The term carries too much derogatory > baggage, in my opinion. ^ Thank you, that makes all the flak I got for my from DHTML to DOM Scripting article worth while. http://icant.co.uk/articles/from-dhtml-to-dom/ -- Chris Heilmann Blog: http://www.wait-till-i.com Writing: http://icant.co.uk/ Binaries: http://www.onlinetools.org/