[Finance] Re: [theforum] lists (was: We've got a serious problem here at evolt.org)

[Martin Paul Burns]

Dean wrote on 14/05/2004 15:08:06:

> On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 02:42:23PM +0100, Garrett Coakley wrote:
> > On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 02:10:28PM +0100, William Anderson wrote:
> >
> > > >We haven't had any response to a few emails that implied people with

> > > >admin rights, and matters have been complicated needlessly.
> > >
> > > my message re: dns wasn't answered by david u because he wasn't
subbed to
> > > sysadmin - just means we need to ensure everyone everywhere is
> on the right
> > > lists.
> >
> > Which should be much easier with the streamlined lists with any luck.
> >
> > When are they going to be actioned btw?
>
> As may have been noted in my other e-mail, it would probably be best
> to wait until we changed servers before doing this.  I've never had
> any luck getting an 'admin' list working on theraq because there was a
> user account called 'admin' on it.  It also means less migration when
> we get the new box, assuming that Finance agrees we can take it on and
> no one has any objections.

Assuming this is still true:
http://lists.evolt.org/sysadminarchive/2003-August/000765.html
(we should have more now, right?)
then we should jfdi imo

Anyone arguing?

Cheers
Martin