[Javascript] Good vs. Eval (was Form validation)
Jeff Greenberg
jeff at websciences.org
Tue Jan 20 13:05:52 CST 2004
You refer to the function object without the parentheses:
function myFunction()
{
//do something here
}
functionList=new Array();
functionList["myFunction"]=myFunction;
Then to execute the function, you use the parentheses:
functionList["myFunction"]();
Peter Brunone wrote:
> But how do you get the array to point to the *execution* of the function rather than the return value of the function? That is, if I want to set functionList["myFunction"] equal to myFunction(), how do I get it in there so that I can use it?
>
> IMO, this is a great discussion; keep it coming!
>
>Original Message:
>
>
>>From: Jeff Greenberg <jeff at websciences.org>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>One of the easiest ways to call a function based on a string is to index
>>into an array or an object like so:
>>
>>functionList["myFunction"]();
>>
>>eval is not inherently bad or inefficient, it is just often used
>>improperly or in cases where more thought should go into the design and
>>architecture of the code. It is, in fact, indispensible if you are
>>trying to extend the core javascript language or work with dynamically
>>generated/modified code. It should not be used in "every day" code, and
>>if you find yourself using it in a small bit of code, it is likely you
>>are misusing it. Nothing is set in stone of course, and this is just a
>>general guideline.
>>
>>Peter Brunone wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> No problem; just start a new thread!
>>>
>>> What if you want to run a function based on a string?
>>>
>>>-Peter B.
>>>
>>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Javascript mailing list
>Javascript at LaTech.edu
>https://lists.LaTech.edu/mailman/listinfo/javascript
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.evolt.org/pipermail/javascript/attachments/20040120/6dc738cc/attachment.htm>
More information about the Javascript
mailing list