[Javascript] looped var

Mckinney, Lori K lori.mckinney at intergraph.com
Thu Apr 20 09:39:10 CDT 2006


Have you tried this?

objA.onclick = new Function ("alert(" + intI + ")" ); 

-----Original Message-----
From: javascript-bounces at LaTech.edu
[mailto:javascript-bounces at LaTech.edu] On Behalf Of Cutter (JSRelated)
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 9:21 AM
To: [JavaScript List]
Subject: [Javascript] looped var

There is one problem in Javascript that I cannot seem to get a handle on
and it is killling me! I can't seem to get variables to pass by value as
I would hope. Take the following example:

for (var intI = 0 ; intI < 10 ; intI++){ var objA =
document.createElement( "div" );

// Set the click for the link.
objA.onclick = function(){ alert( intI ); };

// Set the link into the body div.
objDiv.appendChild( objA );
}

Now, in my head, each one of those links, when clicked should alert the
appropriate intI value (0, 1, 2, 3, etc.); however, each of them will
alert 10 which is the value that broke the FOR loop. It's like they all
point to one variable and then get updated for each loop of the FOR
iteration.

This came across another one of my lists (non-JS) that I thought might
be better asked here. Any help is appreciated.

Cutter

***********

I can't seem to find a good solution to this. One method that seems to
work, but is poop is something along the lines of:

// Define a function INSIDE this function.
function GetI( intX ){
return(
function(){ alert(intX); };
);
}

for (var intI = 0 ; intI < 10 ; intI++){ var objA =
document.createElement( "div" );

// Set the click for the link.
objA.onclick = GetI( intX );

// Set the link into the body div.
objDiv.appendChild( objA );
}

This method works as would be expected, though I seem to think that it
is doing the exact same thing. It must be something to do with the
scoping.
Since the intI value is getting passed to a local scope (int GetI()),
and then getting passed back, it must be unique (since the local scope
of the
GetI() method is created unique of each FOR iteration.

This solution seems truly ganky to me. There has to be a better way. And
this is just a simple example. I have many places where I want to be
doing this with object reference and dynamic event handling. This one
simple bumb is really holding me back!

Please help!!!
.......................
Ben Nadel
_______________________________________________
Javascript mailing list
Javascript at LaTech.edu
https://lists.LaTech.edu/mailman/listinfo/javascript



More information about the Javascript mailing list