<DIV>Hi,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Please visit </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><A href="http://www.geocities.com/clipower">http://www.geocities.com/clipower</A></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>To see, How powerfully javascript can be used at client side?</DIV>
<DIV>You can also download, easy to use free web controls.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Thanks</DIV>
<DIV>Cli,<BR><BR><B><I>Peter Brunone <peter@brunone.com></I></B> wrote:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">Carl,<BR><BR>If they did that, they'd have to require the .NET framework on every<BR>computer. Now, I'm sure that's a goal of theirs (especially with Longhorn<BR>et al on the horizon), but it doesn't make any sense -- to me, anyway --<BR>that they would drop JScript (their own version of Javascript) when it's so<BR>integrally involved in so many areas. Besides, it's a scripting language,<BR>whereas VB.NET is a compiled language. It's like saying they'd drop Notepad<BR>in favor of Office... the two just don't compare.<BR>Basically, I wouldn't bother worrying about the future of Javascript<BR>anytime soon.<BR><BR>Cheers,<BR><BR>Peter<BR><BR>|-----Original Message-----<BR>|From: javascript-bounces@LaTech.edu<BR>|<BR>|I keep hearing a rumor that Microsoft IE is planning to drop JavaScript in<BR>|favor of VisualBasic.net. Anyone come across any "definitive"<BR>|information on<BR>|this?<BR>|<BR>|Carl<BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>Javascript mailing list<BR>Javascript@LaTech.edu<BR>https://lists.LaTech.edu/mailman/listinfo/javascript</BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BR>cli,<br>Visit me at http://www.geocities.com/clipower<p><hr SIZE=1>
Do you Yahoo!?<br>
Free <a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/tag/*http://calendar.yahoo.com">online calendar</a> with sync to Outlook(TM).