<html><div style='background-color:'><DIV class=RTE>
<P>This is a very good idea, but it takes to much of coding & overcoding. Geting the div's exact size, setting the background, positioning exactly the transparent image again, streching it to fill the div and all over again untill the last image. It will at least take trice the weight than it would normally take. And the code would bebome very unreadable. But I like this solution for few images in content.</P>
<P>Yet, once again I come to the choice of displaying the page in a web 'dialog'. But web page dialogs, -I'm afraid are IE only. (not sure about this! - please if anyone knows more...)<BR>What is most important about web dialogs is the fact that you can not select the content, can't rightclick on it, the only things that interact are links and buttons (not leaving behind other system-ready objects like fields, dropers, etc).<BR>So, with the content expire setting in mind you can almost be sure that nobody will be able to sniff or copy your: scripts, text content, images or anything from that page.</P>
<P>So if anybody knows more on dialog support from other browsers, -please let us know!</P>
<P>Regards, Troy III</P></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #a0c6e5 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 11px; FONT-FAMILY: tahoma,sans-serif">
<HR color=#a0c6e5 SIZE=1>
<DIV></DIV>From: <I>Triche Osborne <wdlists@triche-osborne.com></I><BR>Reply-To: <I>"\[JavaScript List\]" <javascript@LaTech.edu></I><BR>To: <I>"[JavaScript List]" <javascript@LaTech.edu></I><BR>Subject: <I>Re: [Javascript] No right click on images</I><BR>Date: <I>Thu, 15 Sep 2005 07:19:28 -0500</I><BR>>Alan Easton wrote:<BR>>><BR>>>I realise you cannot prevent your images being taken, all <BR>>>developers know it, but it is basically a bit of "piece and mind" <BR>>>for the client. They feel something like this enough of a deterent <BR>>>to the normal web user.<BR>>><BR>><BR>>Hi Alan,<BR>> I know you've already said somewhere in this thready, though I <BR>>can't recall where that in this case you were dealing with an extant <BR>>site with lots of images. Given
that, I can see why you might want <BR>>something that doesn't take a lot of fuss to do, especially if all <BR>>you're protecting is graphics. So . . . the following is offered <BR>>only as an alternative for future reference:<BR>> I have two clients who are commercial photographers. Both realize <BR>>that you can't stop a determined thief, but both (understandably) <BR>>wish to discourage casual swiping. Since I get really annoyed at <BR>>disabled context menus--especially since you can turn off JS and <BR>>disable the script--I've resorted to a non-JS solution that's a bit <BR>>more complex but less intrusive.<BR>> For each image display, I create a DIV the same size as the image <BR>>with the photo as its background, then put a single-pixel <BR>>transparent image stretched to exactly the same size within it. If <BR>>the viewer right-clicks and
tries to view or save the image, they <BR>>get the transparent GIF, and since it exactly covers the background, <BR>>they can't reach the background image to save or print it.<BR>> As I said, this takes a bit more work, and I wouldn't bother unless <BR>>I was building the site from scratch and the pictures are the source <BR>>of income. I'm just throwing it out for an alternative. You never <BR>>know when it may come in handy.<BR>><BR>>Triche<BR>><BR>>_______________________________________________<BR>>Javascript mailing list<BR>>Javascript@LaTech.edu<BR>>https://lists.LaTech.edu/mailman/listinfo/javascript<BR></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></div><br clear=all><hr>Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! <a href="http://g.msn.com/8HMBEN/2731??PS=47575" target="_top">MSN Messenger</a> Download today it's FREE!</html>