[Marketing] Re: [Content] Definitive statement why a link is not anarticle

[javier velasco]

Madhu Menon wrote:
>
> At 11:18 PM 30-07-02, Joel Canfield wrote:
> >Let's get a marketing folk to create the definitive evolt.org stance on 'why
> >a link isn't an article' and just refer/copy-paste/whatever
> >
> >I'm dirt at *most* kinds of rejection letter. My only hope is the
> >bear-in-the-back-room technique.
>
> This doesn't need to be so hard.
>
> OK, here goes:
>
> Hello [person],
>
> Thanks for submitting your article to evolt.org. We're sorry that we can't
> accept links to other articles on our site. If you'd like to copy your
> original article and submit it in its entirety, we'd be happy to consider it.
>
> Please let us know if you have any questions.
>
> Regards,
>
> [me/you/whoever]

IMO it should be *us*, as in evolt.org


> Don't you think that will suffice?

yes it will, thanks Mad