[Theforum] Re: (no subject)
.jeff
jeff at members.evolt.org
Wed Feb 6 01:13:04 CST 2002
rudy,
><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
> From: rudy
>
> i don't have anything to add to the discussion, either,
> because i haven't been following it closely, because it
> has been **too argumentative**
><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
oh, come on buddy. that's no fair. it really hasn't been that
argumentative. i think we've done a fairly good job of keeping things
impersonal and working out the details themselves.
><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
> i'm sorry, but i cannot spare the time to read those
> long threads, [...]
><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
fair enough.
><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
> especially the ones where it's "you said, i said, you
> said, i said, why aren't you listening..."
><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
i honestly don't recall anything quite like that.
><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
> i think it would be wise to define "evolt's voting body"
> before we go any further
><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
sure, but that's actually separate from the polling/voting app as it will
handle pre-defined and specially created groups with ease.
><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
> i can tell you right now (i'm not making a rule, i'm
> just predicting) that nobody on the site is gonna start
> developing a voting app if it doesn't cover polls for
> joe public as well
><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
you bet your boots.
.jeff
http://evolt.org/
jeff at members.evolt.org
http://members.evolt.org/jeff/
More information about the theforum
mailing list