[theforum] movement for redesign

[William Anderson]

Morgan Kelsey wrote:
> > > Hmm, dunno if I agree with that specific sentiment ... why can't
> > > thechat be
> > > the free baggie for evolters?
> > 
> > I don't think we're disagreeing - you get to join thechat for free
> > (calling it thechat at evolters.org would be good), but if you want to do
> > the rest of evolters.org stuff, you pay.
> > 
> > Trial membership would be useful too, if it isn't a pain to administer
> > 
> 
> i'm a little confused, are we suggesting thelist becomes a pay-to-play
> operation?

The current notion is:

*.evolt.org, including lists, including thelist: 
    free to view, free to contribute

*.evolters.org, including lists, *excluding* thechat [1]: 
    free to view, pay [2] to contribute

[1] migrated from evolt.org to again demarcate content and purpose.

[2] with proceeds of course should 100% benefit {evolt|evolters}.org

-- 
_ __/|   ___  ___ __ _________ "When Microsoft Office is your only hammer,
\`O_o'  / _ \/ -_) // / __/ _ \ pretty much everything begins to look like
=(_ _)=/_//_/\__/\_,_/_/  \___/ a nail. Or a thumb." -- Rob Pegoraro
   U - Ack! Phttpt! Thhbbt!     neuro at well dot com  http://neuro.me.uk/