[theforum] URL Schemas & missing data

[Martin Burns]

On Thu, December 2, 2004 4:22 pm, Morgan Kelsey said:
> Martin,
>
>> OK, so that's "good enough" for us. So what's that as an objective
>> standard? How will we know when we've got that?
>>
>
> C'mon, you're being silly now. We're talking about markup.
> Separating content from design, right?

No, not being silly at all. You say you want fantastic quality markup.
Fair enough. Now what do you mean? You've complained about nested divs...
now specify what you think would be of evolt-quality.

Starter for 10:
Validates against chosen HTML/CSS standards. Now which ones..?
And what else.

Cheers
Martin

-- 
"Names, once they are in common use   | Spammers: Send me email to
 quickly become mere sounds, their    | -> yumyum at easyweb.co.uk <- to train
 etymology being buried, like so many | my filter. Currently killing over
 of the earth's marvels, beneath the  | 99.8% of all known spams stone dead.
 dust of habit." - Salman Rushdie     |
http://nuclearelephant.com/projects/dspam

Wooden toys for toddlers:
http://www.purpur.co.uk/shop/index.php?main_page=index&cPath=95
Cute Baby Socks:
http://www.purpur.co.uk/shop/index.php?main_page=index&cPath=85_96