<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
Martin wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>On Friday, December 28, 2001, at 11:19 pm,
Ron Dorman wrote:
<p>> i want to know what you were thinking,
<p>Ron
<p>Everything I'm going to say on the matter is a repeat of
<br>> > are you saying you launched the bot for the purpose of collecting
<br>> > peoples
<br>> > conversations, without their knowledge, so you could report and
stop
<br>> > what
<br>> > you think are problems with evolt?
<br>>
<br>> As this one is mutually exclusive with the last one (ie they
<br>> can't both be true), the answer is obviously "Not
<br>> only have I never said that, I have explicitly said that
<br>> that is not the case on several occasions, at least three
<br>> of which have been this evening"</blockquote>
i don't see where anything was mutually exclusive and find the response
unclear and want to be sure I understand.
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>This was my intent and actions. This remains my intent
<br>and actions. This will continue to be my intent and actions.</blockquote>
so:
<br><b> "you launched the bot for the purpose of collecting
peoples</b>
<br><b> conversations, without their knowledge, so you
could report</b>
<br><b> and stop what you think are problems with evolt?"</b>
<br>is a valid statement? that was, and is, your intent and
actions?
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>I don't believe we have any more to discuss.</blockquote>
you may very well be right.
<p>Ron D.</html>