seriously. not a month after "i don't want to upset anybody by reporting back that i fixed some code i thought was causing performance issues, could be written smoother, was just straight up sloppy, or whatever. however, my urge to make the site perform to its maximum outweighs this. it's not like i'm trying to hide anything. if anybody asks, i'm more than happy to talk about changes. i'm just not going to make it a point to go into detail about every little nuance that was altered." you get bitchy cus i changed something as simple as the number of the categoryid? helllooooo... pot? kettle? and what do you mean 'right next to eachother'? they're arranged in alphabetical order anyways. we've never used a PK from one table to the next since the sequence went in place. and your 2 reasons i guess i may not know of because you never said what they were. .djc. .jeff wrote: > i'm really pissed off about the change you made. it doesn't f*cking matter > if there are other tables that use the number 2 for their pk. furthermore, > it's stupid that we're even using the same sequence number for all tables. > i made requests in the past to try to keep the categoryid as low as > possible -- requests that went unanswered. so now, i add it myself this > time in the hopes that it'd finally be done right and then you go and change > it. what's the point of even bothering? > > fwiw, i made it 2 for several reasons, reasons you may or may not be aware > of. besides, don't you think it was nice to have the categoryid for news > and community news right next to each other?