i do like the URL scheme, don't get me wrong.. i also think its really cool, i just (still) don't understand how it works a year later, thats all.. it seems the level of importance concerning a feature is a direct result of how much time those wanting said feature have to pitch and advocate it. not a slam or anything, just an obvservation from the cheap seats. .djc. isaac wrote: >>w.e.o is bloated enough IMO for a CMS. to clarify, a CMS that runs on >>oracle and uses a URL scheme that isn't easily implemented and only ~3 >>people understand. >> > > I remember the days when you were so proud of your sexy URLs... ;) > > >>there are more important things to implement within our CMS right now >>than a voting app. like all the things talked about last week but >>haven't yet been done. >> > > I disagree. I can think of few things less important than the voting > application right now.