[thechat] <grumble />

[erik mattheis]

Indeed, there is nothing to argue about here: this second largest
chuck - $144B - is specifically appropriated to fund existing state
programs which would otherwise be eliminated or scaled back due to
deficits state governments are experiencing.

Thus, the fascinating flap of news stories about whether all the
Republican governors who spoke out against the bill are going to take
the dirty, immoral money or not.

On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Matt Warden <mwarden at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:57 AM, erik mattheis <gozz at gozz.com> wrote:
>> The second biggest goes to state governments to fund existing
>> programs.
>
> And what do you think that money goes to?
>
> I don't really feel like getting into an argument. I will just say
> that I work at one of these big faceless consulting companies in the
> public sector industry; specifically, state governments. I'm not
> complaining. Personally, this is great. Maybe I'll go to Hawaii on
> your tax dollar. I just think it's wrong.

-- 
Erik Mattheis

Postulate: One cat has eight tails.
Proof: No cat has seven tails. One cat has one more tail than no cat.
Therefore, one cat has eight tails.

http://fearofclowns.com/