[Theforum] Re: (no subject)

[.jeff]

rudy,

><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
> From: rudy
>
> i don't have anything to add to the discussion, either,
> because i haven't been following it closely, because it
> has been **too argumentative**
><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><

oh, come on buddy.  that's no fair.  it really hasn't been that
argumentative.  i think we've done a fairly good job of keeping things
impersonal and working out the details themselves.

><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
> i'm sorry, but i cannot spare the time to read those
> long threads, [...]
><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><

fair enough.

><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
> especially the ones where it's "you said, i said, you
> said, i said, why aren't you listening..."
><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><

i honestly don't recall anything quite like that.

><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
> i think it would be wise to define "evolt's voting body"
> before we go any further
><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><

sure, but that's actually separate from the polling/voting app as it will
handle pre-defined and specially created groups with ease.

><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
> i can tell you right now (i'm not making a rule, i'm
> just predicting) that nobody on the site is gonna start
> developing a voting app if it doesn't cover polls for
> joe public as well
><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><

you bet your boots.

.jeff

http://evolt.org/
jeff at members.evolt.org
http://members.evolt.org/jeff/