Having just edited my article after some feedback I found out that the article has to be re-approved. That of course makes sense, but then I learn that the article won't be available at all until it has been re-approved. Woah! Certainly it seems like a better approach would be to leave the original article alone until the edit has been approved. Once the edit is approved it could replace the original. I suddenly get the sense that the Evolt CMS doesn't have version control. IMHO, it should. Matt Liotta President & CEO Montara Software, Inc. http://www.montarasoftware.com/ V: 415-577-8070 F: 415-341-8906 P: 4155778070 at messaging.sprintpcs.com > -----Original Message----- > From: theforum-admin at lists.evolt.org [mailto:theforum- > admin at lists.evolt.org] On Behalf Of aardvark > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 10:28 PM > To: theforum at lists.evolt.org > Subject: RE: [Theforum] content approval > > > From: "Matt Liotta" <mliotta at r337.com> > > > > Just to be honest... I swear I am not trying to be mean, but most of > > the content that appears on Evolt would never make with commercial run > > publications. Quite a number of Evolt "articles" are really nothing > > more than tips and editorials. I don't think that is bad, but I would > > think it would be better to classify them as such. > > don't worry, i don't think you're mean... i think it's valuable > feedback that we don't get nearly enough of... > > -- > Read the evolt.org case study > Usability: The Site Speaks for Itself > http://amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1904151035/evoltorg02-20 > ISBN: 1904151035 > > > --- > evolt.org wiki: http://freezope2.nipltd.net/acorn/evolt/ > - > How can you help? > http://freezope2.nipltd.net/acorn/evolt/FactFindingMission