[theforum] RFC: w.e.o and l.e.o Server Integration

[Garrett Coakley]

On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 06:44:39AM +0100, Martin Burns wrote:
> 
> >1) Move l.e.o, d.e.o, and b.e.o to a Windows platform to be place with
> >   w.e.o which is currently running on Windows with CF/IIS/SQL Server.
> >
> >2) Move w.e.o to a Linux platform which is what l.e.o, d.e.o, and
> >   b.e.o currently run on.
> >
> >3) Defer the decision and just move l.e.o, d.e.o, and b.e.o with the
> >   intention of re-visiting the issue either through another migration
> >   or by going to a distributed computing model.
> 
> +1 to 3, not so much as a 'deferring the decision' as "I'd rather get 
> the new box up and running rsn, even if we've decided what the end 
> result will be"


[/me finishes wading through more theforum mails than I've seen in a 
*long* time]


#3 for me too. 

Not only for the fact that the raq is starting to have the occassional
creak with mail volumes so I would feel happier with leo and beo being
sorted asap, but also as jeff has said, that allows us to take a look at
new tech that wasn't mature enough when weo's current implementation was 
built.

G.


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Work : http://www.gencon.co.uk & http://spiked.co.uk
   Play : http://polytechnic.co.uk
  Learn : http://evolt.org