[theforum] Rebuild progress and this week's actions

[Martin Burns]

On Thu, December 2, 2004 12:04 pm, William Anderson said:
> aardvark wrote:
>> Morgan Kelsey wrote:
>>
>>> there's also no record of what's discussed, except for those
>>> participating.
>
> given that #evolt is a melting pot where almost anything goes, it doesn't
> seem appropriate to treat it as a "formal" place of discussion - theforum
> does that right now.  If we decide to go the route of increasing formality
> for our chat channel(s), we can publicly log stuff then, but I personally
> don't think publicly logging #evolt right now is appropriate.

While I personally don't have a problem with logging it one way or not,
let's not get sidetracked...

So: who's got an opinion on the front page design elfur posted? Other than
of course, something will need to replace the evolters stuff (so, what?)

Cheers
Martin

-- 
"Names, once they are in common use   | Spammers: Send me email to
 quickly become mere sounds, their    | -> yumyum at easyweb.co.uk <- to train
 etymology being buried, like so many | my filter. Currently killing over
 of the earth's marvels, beneath the  | 99.8% of all known spams stone dead.
 dust of habit." - Salman Rushdie     |
http://nuclearelephant.com/projects/dspam

Wooden toys for toddlers:
http://www.purpur.co.uk/shop/index.php?main_page=index&cPath=95
Cute Baby Socks:
http://www.purpur.co.uk/shop/index.php?main_page=index&cPath=85_96