.jeff wrote: > um, no, should i? how drunk did i get again? hah! you were sticking your ass out my window! er. > yes, there's not much in place to support the ideal solution(s) that have > been discussed. it needs to be built from scratch. ok, thats basically what i wanted to hear. > currently using the architecture, now's the time to make that decision. true dat. > i think an evaluation of what exactly the specific functions this > application should perform is necessary in order to build this project to a > satisfactory state of completion. this evaluation should cover desired > functionality, browser support for the creation/editing process, what > exactly is editable, and what exactly is tied together for consistency sake. > there's alot of decisions that need to be made and functional specifications > that need to be decided on before we can continue. > > so, let's talk specifications and get all the details of it ironed out > before we hit the development hard. oy. wheres martin when you need him? ;) buy ya, i'll start thinking of some shit here. thanks .djc.