[thesite] UEUE v.0.2 Update

[Daniel J. Cody]

.jeff wrote:


>><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
>>we will trust the people running the subsite, 'we' wont
>>always have control over it though.
>><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
>>
> 
> no?  why not?
> 
> i think there are many reasons why we should make sure that never happens.


care to share them, or to just keep continually arguing ?


>><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
>>and it might not always be practical for a new subsite
>>to have direct access to the DB. example: its hosted
>>somewhere other than the network the oracle box happens
>>to be sitting on.
>><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
>>
> 
> xml data transfer.  disconnected subsites aren't a problem.


um. this is pretty much what we're doing with ueue. 'data transfer' from 
a DB connected machine to one that isn't. i'm confused as to if you're 
agreeing or not.

.djc.