[thesite] Additions to default CSS file

[aardvark]

sorry for the late response... i, er, had to go on friday...

> From: "Michele Foster" <michele at wordpro.on.ca>
> |
> | td.content { line-height : 130% ; }
[...] 
> However, the references are still being used in two spots within an
> article view (not sure about other pages, yet).
> 
> Can you tell me what to do with Jeff's suggested additions please,
> with respect to pagetitle2. The only place where a link is now, is for
> the Author's linked name.
> 
> <quote>
> 
> <td class="pageTitle2" valign="middle" colspan="2"><h1>User-Defined
> Window Targeting w/ JavaScript</h1><cite class="content">Author: <a
> href="/user/jeff/15/index.html" title="Author info!">.jeff</a></cite>
> 
> </quote>
> 
> So, my questions are .... and these are probably dumb .. but I don't
> wanna mess it all up.
> 
> Should the three link classes be created for "pageTitle2" ?  Should
> the <cite class="content"> above be deleted all together?  Or do we

class="content" should be gutted, IMO... it was for the content 
area of the page only, and meant to sit in a <td>, and neither of 
those applies, so i'd cut it from <cite>... after all, it only controls 
line-height, right?

> still want the <cite> tags there?  If we want the <cite> tags, will
> the link classes defined for pageTitle2 be used or should they instead
> be defined for use within the <cite> tag?   ACK  ;)

leave the <cite>... i don't think it's a 100% perfect usage of the 
tags, but someone else felt they were, and with the itnerpretation of 
the specs so open, it's not worth worrying about...

> And what about "active" state?  Not defined elsewhere, should it be?

maybe i'm on crack, but i see no reason to define a new a set of 
pseudo-classes... the generic a pseudo-classes cascade well 
enough...

just seems like spaghetti to me...