[thesite] Back to the Drawing board for UEUE?

Warden, Matt mwarden at mattwarden.com
Sun Nov 11 18:05:14 CST 2001


On Nov 12, Martin had something to say about RE: [thesite] Back to the...

>>>Or alternatively:
>>>Is what we have good enough for the time being (if not the ideal
>>>situation)?
>>
>>No, unless you feel that stunting other projects like f.e.o is acceptable.
>
>So do I understand you right - what we have now runs what we have
>in production now well enough, but won't run other things we
>have in the pipeline like feo?

I think (that is, if *I* understand your question right). But, the whole
problem UEUE is trying to solve deals with the subsites... basically
trying to fit multiple sites into software that originally was built for a
single site.

So, yeah, w.e.o's fine now. But, like I said, the purpose of UEUE is to
"hook in" other sites without creating duplicates of things like the
member table, etc.

Make sense? Did I even answer your question?  ;-)


Thanks,

--
mattwarden
mattwarden.com





More information about the thesite mailing list