[thesite] Rating Articles .. Whatcha think ?
Russell J. Jungwirth
jungwirr at chumpsquad.com
Thu Nov 15 11:27:11 CST 2001
I like the more constructive aspect to their rating system. It seems to
be more in line with the interactive nature of an on-line community.
I'd change the top and bottom ratings - 'Killer' and 'Lame' are just a
little too cliche.
A Must Read (5) Worth Looking At (4) Not Bad (3) Needs Work (2) Don't
Bother (1)
russ
> Killer! (5) Good stuff (4) So-so; not bad (3) Needs work (2) Lame! (1)
>
> 1 (bad) 2 (poor) 3 (okay) 4 (good) 5(great!!)
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Michele Foster wrote:
> Hey folks..
>
> Was browsing a site that someone posted to thelist .... Comes from IBM
> http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/usability/library/us-tricks/?article=u
> ser
>
> Here's how they list their ratings.
>
> What do you think of this article?
> Killer! (5) Good stuff (4) So-so; not bad (3) Needs work (2) Lame! (1)
>
> I like it .. more "fun/interesting/enticing" than ours ...
>
> 1 (bad) 2 (poor) 3 (okay) 4 (good) 5(great!!)
>
> Comments ?
>
> Michele
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> For unsubscribe, archive, and options, go to:
> http://lists.evolt.org/mailman/listinfo/thesite
>
More information about the thesite
mailing list