[thesite] Rating Articles .. Whatcha think ?

[spinhead]

Maybe I'm thin-skinned, but I really prefer to keep the lower end of the
scale even less emotionally charged than "Don't Bother." I like humor in the
positive ones, and simple/direct (Needs Work/No Thanks) on the lower end.

spinhead


----- Original Message -----
From: "Russell J. Jungwirth" <jungwirr at chumpsquad.com>
To: <thesite at lists.evolt.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:08 PM
Subject: Re: [thesite] Rating Articles .. Whatcha think ?


> I like the more constructive aspect to their rating system.  It seems to
> be more in line with the interactive nature of an on-line community.
>
> I'd change the top and bottom ratings - 'Killer' and 'Lame' are just a
> little too cliche.
>
> A Must Read (5) Worth Looking At (4) Not Bad (3) Needs Work (2) Don't
> Bother (1)
>
> russ
>
> > Killer! (5) Good stuff (4) So-so; not bad (3) Needs work (2) Lame! (1)
> >
> >      1 (bad)    2 (poor)     3 (okay)      4 (good)     5(great!!)
>
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Michele Foster wrote:
>
> > Hey folks..
> >
> > Was browsing a site that someone posted to thelist .... Comes from IBM
> >
http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/usability/library/us-tricks/?article=u
> > ser
> >
> > Here's how they list their ratings.
> >
> > What do you think of this article?
> > Killer! (5) Good stuff (4) So-so; not bad (3) Needs work (2) Lame! (1)
> >
> > I like it .. more "fun/interesting/enticing" than ours ...
> >
> >      1 (bad)    2 (poor)     3 (okay)      4 (good)     5(great!!)
> >
> > Comments ?
> >
> > Michele
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > For unsubscribe, archive, and options, go to:
> > http://lists.evolt.org/mailman/listinfo/thesite
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> For unsubscribe, archive, and options, go to:
> http://lists.evolt.org/mailman/listinfo/thesite
>