WHOA .. slow down - content class ..... :( was Re: [thesite] test.evolt.org change fyi

[Michele Foster]

Jeff,

----- Original Message -----
From: ".jeff" <jeff at members.evolt.org>



|
| ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
| > Who was it that said the class for content was removed,
| > cos the line height was messing other things up?
| ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
|
| i simply commented it out on w.e.o in isaac.css because it was causing
some
| of the issues we're seeing now.
|
| ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
| > And who was it that told me to delete it within the
| > HTML?
| ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
|
| since working in the source code the past couple of days, i think we
should
| think alittle more about the ramifications of simply removing all
instances
| of that class.  it's used all over the place.


This doesn't make sense at all ... if the class is commented out in the
working CSS file (which it is), then its not being used in the HTML file, at
all.  The reference can exist, but its not working, nor should it be.  IOW,
wherever there are references to class="content" the text is not being
styled with that class, as it in essence does not exist.  So, the text is
being styled by a higher up class.

So, you can decide .. if you want to CREATE a new class for content,
elsewise we just delete the references which are irrelevant.  No sense in
referring to someting which isn't in existance.


Michele