[thesite] Ratings Bar .. CSS .. yet again ...

[.jeff]

david,

><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
> From: David McCreath
>
> Tonight on ABC: It's the .jeff and Dave show! Watch
> Dave try to catch up on three months of development
> while .jeff rolls his eyes and sets him straight!
><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><

where do we send the pilot?

><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
> Well, the table is coded like this:
>
> <td width="25%">
>
> <td width="25%">
>
> <td width="18%">
> <td width="7%">
> <td width="25%">
>
> So if it's uniformly 25%, there should only be four
> cells.
><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><

um what?  that's for a table that's showing a rating of 3.4 (68%).  the 18%
and 7% width cells are to show the 0.4 portion beyond 3.0.

><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
> HOWEVER! I think there should be five cells. Why?
>
> If the rating bar is going to show above the radio
> buttons (the way the red background one does
> currently), then the 0-1 section gives the whole thing
> a nice visual continuity [poking with blunt stick].
> Having five radio buttons and four sections would be
> confusing.
><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><

perhaps you need to catch up on the conversations that michele, joel, and i
had that led up to this:

http://test.evolt.org/article/rating_convo/17/16286/#comments

after you read the conversation and look at the various iterations i'm sure
it'll make more sense why it's ended up the way it has.

enjoy,

.jeff

http://evolt.org/
jeff at members.evolt.org
http://members.evolt.org/jeff/